Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, et al. The Swedish two-county trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:625–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70191-3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer. 2001;91:1724–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9%3c1724::aid-cncr1190%3e3.0.co;2-v.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260:658–63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110469.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fanto C, Ostillio L, et al. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1105–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:583–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, Durand MA, Plecha DM, Greenberg JS, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014;311:2499–507. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.6095.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marinovich ML, Hunter KE, Macaskill P, Houssami N. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis or mammography: a meta-analysis of cancer detection and recall. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:942–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy121.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin SU, Chang JM, Bae MS, Lee SH, Cho N, Seo M, et al. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3399-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ohashi R, Nagao M, Nakamura I, Okamoto T, Sakai S. Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast Cancer. 2018;25:590–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0859-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Niu S, Wang X, Zhao N, Liu G, Kan Y, Dong Y, et al. Radiomic evaluations of the diagnostic performance of DM, DBT, DCE MRI, DWI, and their combination for the diagnosisof breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:725922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.725922.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lei J, Yang P, Zhang L, Wang Y, Yang K. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:595–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alabousi M, Zha N, Salameh JP, Samoilov L, Sharifabadi AD, Pozdnyakov A, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2058–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06549-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ko MJ, Park DA, Kim SH, Ko ES, Shin KH, Lim W, et al. Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:1240–52. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tagliafico A, Houssami N. Digital breast tomosynthesis might not be the optimal modality for detecting microcalcification. Radiology. 2015;275:618–9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142752.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Abrams G, Ganott MA, Hakim C, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:320–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.10.4656.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:982–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20:2865–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.942.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

You C, Zhang Y, Gu Y, Xiao Q, Liu G, Shen X, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast Cancer. 2020;27:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-00992-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yi A, Chang JM, Shin SU, Chu AJ, Cho N, Noh DY, et al. Detection of noncalcified breast cancer in patients with extremely dense breasts using digital breast tomosynthesis compared with full-field digital mammography. Br J Radiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180101.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Waldherr C, Cerny P, Altermatt HJ, Berclaz G, Ciriolo M, Buser K, et al. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:226–31. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8202.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thomassin-Naggara I, Perrot N, Dechoux S, Ribeiro C, Chopier J, de Bazelaire C. Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thibault F, Dromain C, Breucq C, Balleyguier CS, Malhaire C, Steyaert L, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2441–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tang W, Hu FX, Zhu H, Wang QF, Gu YJ, Peng WJ. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: a comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;66:105–16. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-16242.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seo M, Chang JM, Kim SA, Kim WH, Lim JH, Lee SH, et al. Addition of digital breast tomosynthesis to full-field digital mammography in the diagnostic setting: additional value and cancer detectability. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19:438–46. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.438.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Gubern-Merida A, Imhof-Tas M, Lardenoije S, Wanders AJT, Andersson I, et al. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more? Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1938–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5167-3.

Artic