Götze H, et al. Depression and anxiety in long-term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(1):211–20.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mehnert-Theuerkauf A et al. Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress, and perceived need for psychosocial support in cancer patients and their relatives stratified by biopsychosocial factors: rationale, study design, and methods of a prospective multi-center observational cohort study (LUPE study). Front Psychol 2023;14:1–14.

Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, et al. Fatigue, emotional distress, and illness uncertainty in patients with metastatic cancer: results from the prospective NEOETIC_SEOM study. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(12):9722–32.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thompson T, et al. The dyadic cancer outcomes framework: a general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers. Soc Sci Med. 2021;287:114357.

Kent EE, et al. The characteristics of Informal cancer caregivers In the united States. In Seminars In oncology nursing. Elsevier. 2019.

Stovall E, Greenfield S, Hewitt M. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies. 2005.

Karimi Moghaddam Z, et al. Caregiving burden, depression, and anxiety among family caregivers of patients with cancer: an investigation of patient and caregiver factors. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059605.

Bedaso A, Dejenu G, Duko B. Depression among caregivers of cancer patients: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncol. 2022;31(11):1809–20.

Google Scholar 

Wikman A, et al. Balancing intimacy, family life and cancer - a qualitative study on the impact of parental cancer on the couple relationship in couples with dependent children. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2025;75: 102814.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang X, et al. Dyadic interventions for cancer patient-caregiver dyads: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2025;161: 104948.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xiao Y, et al. The effectiveness of dyadic interventions for health outcomes of prostate cancer patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 2025;24(1): 119.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun Q, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of couple‐based dyadic intervention on the psychological distress of cancer patients and their partners. J Clin Nurs. 2025.

Li L, et al. Effectiveness of dyadic interventions on quality of life for cancer patients and family caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17700.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Montero A, et al. LGBT adults’ experiences with discrimination and health care disparities: findings from the KFF survey of racism, discrimination, and health. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2024.

Power R et al. Surviving discrimination by pulling together: LGBTQI Cancer patient and carer experiences of minority stress and social support. Front Oncol 2022;12:1–20.

Seay J, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of a LGBT cultural competency training for oncologists: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):314.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Quinn GP et al. Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(5):384–400.

Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674–97.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brooks VR. Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington, Massachuetts: Lexington Books; 1981.

Google Scholar 

Hatzenbuehler M. How does sexual minority stigma get under the skin?? A psychological mediation framework. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:707–30.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stamm LE, et al. Disparities in the cancer continuum experienced by transgender and gender-diverse patients: a rapid review. Cancer. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35788

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kamen CS, et al. Community-driven identification and adaptation of a cancer caregiving intervention for LGBTQIA populations. Front Oncol. 2022;12: 873491.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kamen C, et al. A dyadic exercise intervention to reduce psychological distress among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual Cancer survivors. LGBT Health. 2016;3(1):57–64.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nyitray AG, et al. The accuracy of anal self- and companion exams among sexual minority men and transgender women: a prospective analysis. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;31:100704.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eliason MJ, Dibble S, Dejoseph J. Nursing’s silence on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender issues: the need for emancipatory efforts. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2010;33(3):206–18.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Network NLC. Best Practices in creating and delivering LGBTQ Cultural competency trainings for health and social service agencies.

Branstrom R, Van Der Star A. All inclusive public health–what about LGBT populations? Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):353–4.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basten M, et al. Psychosocial factors, health behaviors and risk of cancer incidence: testing interaction and effect modification in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2024;154(10):1745–59.

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Milbury K, et al. Dyadic yoga for head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation and their family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2024;67(6):490–500.

Google Scholar 

Leng QL, et al. Preliminary effects of a yoga intervention for lung cancer dyads: benefits for care partners. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(7):447.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Z, et al. A couple-based dyadic coping intervention for colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;70: 102565.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, et al. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a systematic transaction model-guided dyadic coping nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer and their spousal caregivers: A pilot study. Asia-Pacific J Oncol Nurs. 2025;12:100621.

Google Scholar 

Zhou J, et al. Mutual communication intervention for colorectal cancer patient–spousal caregiver dyads: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Health Psychol. 2024;29(4):855–76.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiesenfeld S, Lambert S, Laizner AM. A stepped-care approach to self-management: a qualitative study among individuals with cancer and their caregivers using the Coping-Together program. Support Care Cancer. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09175-5

Stephenson R, et al. Stronger together: results from a randomized controlled efficacy trial of a dyadic intervention to improve engagement in HIV care among serodiscordant male couples in three US cities. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(8):2369–81.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mitchell JW, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of an electronic health HIV prevention toolkit intervention with concordant HIV-negative, same-sex male couples on sexual agreement outcomes: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(2):e16807.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Starks TJ, et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing with sexual minority male couples to reduce drug use and sexual risk: the couples health project. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(2):310–27.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Starks TJ, et al. A full-factorial randomized controlled trial of adjunct couples HIV testing and counseling components addressing drug use and communication skills among sexual minority male couples. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):2158.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tabrisky AP, et al. Couples-focused intervention to improve engagement in HIV care: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e037468.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mitchell JW, et al. Assessing a couples-based, digital HIV serostatus-neutral intervention (Para ti, Para mi, Para Nosotros) for adult cisgender sexual minority male couples in Lima, Peru: protocol for a 6-month pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024;13: e63106.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sullivan S, Sullivan P, Stephenson R. Acceptability and feasibility of a telehealth intervention for sexually transmitted infection testing among male couples: protocol for a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(10):e14481.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fredriksen-Goldsen K, et al. Design and development of the first randomized controlled trial of an intervention (IDEA) for sexual and gender minority older adults living with dementia and care partners. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023;128: 107143.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li J, et al. Development of a dyadic mindfulness self-compassion intervention for patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers: A multi-method study. Asia-Pacific J Oncol Nurs. 2025;12:100622.

Google Scholar 

Schuler MS, Prince DM, Collins RL. Disparities in social and economic determinants of health by sexual identity, gender, and age: results from the 2015–2018 National survey on drug use and health. LGBT Health. 2021;8(5):330–9.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Health NIo. Sexual and gender minority populations in NIH-Supported research. NIH Office of the Director, Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (SGMRO); 2019.

McCuistian C, et al. Sexual health interventions for racial/ethnic minorities using community-based participatory research: a systematic review. Health Educ Behav. 2023;50(1):107–20.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Drysdale K, et al. Targeting cancer prevention and screening interventions to LGBTQ communities: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(5):1233–48.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hudson KD, Romanelli M. We are powerful people: health-promoting strengths of LGBTQ communities of color. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(8):1156–70.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gamarel KE, et al. Minority stress, smoking patterns, and cessation attempts: findings from a Community-Sample of transgender women in the San Francisco Bay area. Nicotine & Tobacco Res. 2016;18(3):306–13.

Google Scholar 

Bruce Baskerville N et al. A qualitative study of tobacco interventions for LGBTQ + youth and young adults: overarching themes and key learnings. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–14.

Gray TD, Dovala TK, Cordova JV. Affirmative adaptations of the relationship checkup to meet the needs of LGBTQ couples. J Couple Relatsh Therapy. 2023;22(4):299–323.

Google Scholar 

Margolies L. Families of Choice; Sources of Support for LGBT cancer survivors, in LGBTQ HealthLink. 2013.

Kamen C, et al. Disparities in psychological distress impacting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncol. 2015;24(11):1384–91.

Google Scholar 

Joslin-Roher E, Wheeler DP. Partners in transition: the transition experience of lesbian, bisexual, and queer identified partners of transgender men. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2009;21(1):30–48.

Google Scholar 

Elk R. The intersection of racism, discrimination, bias, and homophobia toward African American sexual minority patients with cancer withi