Subasinghe R, Soto D, Jia J (2009) Global aquaculture and its role in sustainable development. Rev Aquac 1:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2008.01002.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Hancz C (2022) Application of probiotics for environmentally friendly and sustainable aquaculture: a review. Sustainability 14:15479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215479

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bashir I, Lone FA, Bhat RA et al (2020) Concerns and threats of contamination on aquatic ecosystems. Bioremediation and biotechnology. Springer, Cham, pp 1–26

Google Scholar 

Banerjee G, Ray AK (2017) The advancement of probiotics research and its application in fish farming industries. Res Vet Sci 115:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.01.016

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandiyan P, Balaraman D, Thirunavukkarasu R et al (2013) Probiotics in aquaculture. Drug Invent Today 5:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dit.2013.03.003

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Desriac F, Defer D, Bourgougnon N et al (2010) Bacteriocin as weapons in the marine animal-associated bacteria warfare: inventory and potential applications as an aquaculture probiotic. Mar Drugs 8:1153–1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8041153

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pierson LS, Pierson EA (2010) Metabolism and function of phenazines in bacteria: Impacts on the behavior of bacteria in the environment and biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1659–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2509-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mavrodi DV, Bonsall RF, Delaney SM et al (2001) Functional analysis of genes for biosynthesis of pyocyanin and phenazine-1-carboxamide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 183:6454–6465. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.21.6454-6465.2001

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pai SS, Anas A, Jayaprakash NS et al (2010) Penaeus monodon larvae can be protected from Vibrio harveyi infection by pre-emptive treatment of a rearing system with antagonistic or non-antagonistic bacterial probiotics. Aquac Res 41:847–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02362.x

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Britigan BE, Rasmussen GT, Cox CD (1997) Augmentation of oxidant injury to human pulmonary epithelial cells by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Siderophore Pyochelin. Infect Immun 65:1071–1076

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hassan HM, Fridovich I (1980) Mechanism of the antibiotic action pyocyanine. J Bacteriol 141(1):156–163

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hassett DJ, Charniga L, Bean K et al (1991) Response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to pyocyanin: mechanisms of resistance, antioxidant defenses, and demonstration of a manganese-cofactored superoxide dismutase. Infect Immun 60:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.60.2.328-336.1992

Article  Google Scholar 

Jabłońska J, Augustyniak A, Dubrowska K, Rakoczy R (2023) The two faces of pyocyanin—why and how to steer its production? World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39:103

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

DeBritto S, Gajbar TD, Satapute P et al (2020) Isolation and characterization of nutrient dependent pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its dye and agrochemical properties. Sci Rep 10:1542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58335-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sengupta S, Bhowal J (2021) Study on the antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of pyocyanin extracted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Springer, Singapore, pp 133–141

Google Scholar 

Shouman H, Said HS, Kenawy HI, Hassan R (2023) Molecular and biological characterization of pyocyanin from clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb Cell Fact 22:166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02169-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zani ACB, de Almeida ÉJR, Furlan JPR et al (2023) Electrobiochemical skills of Pseudomonas aeruginosa species that produce pyocyanin or pyoverdine for glycerol oxidation in a microbial fuel cell. Chemosphere 335:139073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139073

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marey MA, Abozahra R, El-Nikhely NA et al (2024) Transforming microbial pigment into therapeutic revelation: extraction and characterization of pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its therapeutic potential as an antibacterial and anticancer agent. Microb Cell Fact 23:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02438-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koyun MT, Sirin S, Erdem SA, Aslim B (2022) Pyocyanin isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: characterization, biological activity and its role in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Brazil Arch Biol Technol. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2022210651

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdelaziz AA, Kamer AMA, Al-Monofy KB, Al-Madboly LA (2023) Pseudomonas aeruginosa’s greenish-blue pigment pyocyanin: its production and biological activities. Microb Cell Fact 22:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02122-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Priyaja P (2012) Pyocyanin (5-Methyl–1-hydroxyphenazine) produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as antagonist to Vibrios in aquaculture: Over expression, downstream process and toxicity

Priyaja P, Jayesh P, Philip R, Bright Singh IS (2016) Pyocyanin induced in vitro oxidative damage and its toxicity level in human, fish and insect cell lines for its selective biological applications. Cytotechnology 68:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-014-9765-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balakrishnan S, Ameer A, Pazhur Mohandas S et al (2022) Pyocyanin as a safe aquaculture drug for the control of vibriosis in shrimp recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). Aquac Int 30:2129–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-00890-y

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Priyaja P, Jayesh P, Haseeb M et al (2017) Evaluation of pyocyanin toxicity in various life stages of Penaeus monodon and in nitrifying bacterial consortia for their safe application in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) to abrogate pathogenic vibrios. Aquac Int 25:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0075-0

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chythanya R, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I (2002) Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2 strain. Aquaculture 208:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00714-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Bedoya JC, Dealis ML, Silva CS et al (2019) Enhanced production of target bioactive metabolites produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa LV strain. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.12.024

Article  Google Scholar 

Preetha R, Jayaprakash NS, Philip R, Bright Singh IS (2006) Optimization of carbon and nitrogen sources and growth factors for the production of an aquaculture probiotic (Pseudomonas MCCB 103) using response surface methodology. J Appl Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03149.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Li C, Wally H, Miller SJ, Lu C-D (2009) The multifaceted proteins MvaT and MvaU, members of the H-NS family, control arginine metabolism, pyocyanin synthesis, and prophage activation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 191:6211–6218. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00888-09

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xu H, Lin W, Xia H et al (2005) Influence of ptsP gene on pyocyanin production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.027

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gahlout M, Chauhan PB, Prajapati H et al (2021) Characterization, application and statistical optimization approach for enhanced production of pyocyanin pigment by Pseudomonas aeruginosa DN9. Syst Microbiol Biomanuf 1:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-021-00033-z

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

da Silva AJ, de Souza Cunha J, Hreha T et al (2021) Metabolic engineering of E. coli for pyocyanin production. Metab Eng 64:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2021.01.002

Article  CAS