Abidi W, ´anchez LT-S, Siroy A, Krasteva PV (2022) Weaving of bacterial cellulose by the bcs secretion. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:fuab051. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuab051
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ali-Shtayeh, Ghdeib SIA, Key (1999) Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses 42:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00499.x
Assirey EAR (2015) Nutritional composition of fruit of 10 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia. J Taibah Univ Sci 9:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.07.002
Aswini K, Gopal NO, Uthandi S (2020) Optimized culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter senegalensis MA1. BMC Biotechnol 20:1–16
Azeredo HMC, Barud H, Farinas CS (2019) Bacterial cellulose as a raw material for Food and Food Packaging Applications. Front Sustain Food Syst 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007
Aziz WSWA, Adnan A (2022) Employed bacterial species and bacterial cellulose (BC) applications: the state of play. Squalen Bull Mar Fish Postharvest Biotechnol 17:155–167. https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.672
Bagewadi ZK, Bhavikatti JS, Muddapur UM et al (2020) Statistical optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by isolated thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis strain ZBT2. Carbohydr Res 491:107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2020.107979
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barja F (2021) Bacterial nanocellulose production and biomedical applications. J Biomed Res 35:310–317. https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.35.20210036
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bhatti JM, Raza SA, Alam AF et al (2023) Antibiotic choices among healthcare professionals for enterococcal bacteremia with patterns of resistance and risk factors of mortality, in settings of poor antibiotic stewardship program — a five-year retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 23:514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08498-0
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boccella M, Santella B, Pagliano P et al (2021) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus species: a retrospective cohort study in Italy. Antibiotics 10:1552
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bryan NC, Lebreton F, Gilmore M et al (2021) Genomic and functional characterization of Enterococcus faecalis isolates recovered from the International Space Station and their potential for pathogenicity. Front Microbiol 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.515319
Chandrasekaran PT, Bari NK, Sinha S (2017) Enhanced bacterial cellulose production from Gluconobacter xylinus using super optimal broth. Cellulose 24:4367–4381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1419-2
Choi SM, Shin EJ (2020) The nanofication and functionalization of bacterial cellulose and its applications. Nanomaterials 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030406
Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using Corn Steep Liquor as Nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027
Dechojarassri D, Okada T, Tamura H, Furuike T (2023) Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Hyaluronic Acid/Chitosan/Bacterial cellulose-based membrane. Mater (Basel) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145189
Dhar P, Etula J, Bankar SB (2019) In situ Bioprocessing of Bacterial Cellulose with Graphene: Percolation Network Formation, Kinetic Analysis with Physicochemical and Structural properties Assessment. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2:4052–4066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00581
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Diego O, Serra HR (2019) Cellulose in bacterial Biofilm Botryosphaeran – A Fungal Glucan Kind. Structure and Biological Functions
Digel I, Akimbekov N, Rogachev E, Pogorelova N (2023) Bacterial cellulose produced by Medusomyces gisevii on glucose and sucrose: biosynthesis and structural properties. Cellulose 30:11439–11453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05592-z
Dressing W (2015) Development of Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose Composite films Containing nanodiamonds as a potential flexible platform for Wound Dressing. Mater (Basel) 8:6401–6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095309
El-Naggar NEA, Mohammed ABA, El-Malkey SE (2023) Bacterial nanocellulose production using cantaloupe juice, statistical optimization and characterization. Sci Rep 13:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26642-9
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol (N Y) 39:783–791
Gajan EB, Shirmohammadi A, Aghazadeh M et al (2013) Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from hospitalized patients. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 7:7–9. https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.018
Gao G, Liao Z, Cao Y et al (2021) Highly efficient production of bacterial cellulose from corn stover total hydrolysate by Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Bioresour Technol 341:125781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125781
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghasemi M, Turnbull T, Sebastian S, Kempson I (2021) The mtt assay: utility, limitations, pitfalls, and interpretation in bulk and single-cell analysis. Int J Mol Sci 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312827
Ghazzawy HS, Gouda MM, Awad NS et al (2022) Potential bioactivity of Phoenix dactylifera fruits, leaves, and seeds against prostate and pancreatic cancer cells. Front Nutr 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.998929
Gorgieva S, Jančič U, Cepec E, Trček J (2023) Production efficiency and properties of bacterial cellulose membranes in a novel grape pomace hydrolysate by Komagataeibacter Melomenusus AV436T and komagataeibacter xylinus LMG 1518. Int J Biol Macromol 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125368
Gromovykh TI, Demchenko AG, Feldman NB (2019) Development of bacterial cellulose biomaterial: preparation and establishment of cytotoxicity for eukaryotic cells. Int J Nanotechnol 16:87–99
Gromovykh TI, Pigaleva MA, Gallyamov MO et al (2020) Structural organization of bacterial cellulose: the origin of anisotropy and layered structures. Carbohydr Polym 237:116140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harwood VJ, Delahoya NC, Ulrich RM et al (2004) Molecular confirmation of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium from clinical, faecal and environmental sources. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01518.x
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hasanin MS, Abdelraof M, Hashem AH, El Saied H (2023) Sustainable bacterial cellulose production by Achromobacter using mango peel waste. Microb Cell Fact 22:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
Hassan Z, Mustafa S, Rahim RA, Isa NM (2016) Identification, characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of commensal bacteria isolated from human breast milk in Malaysia. Pertanika J Sci Technol 24:351–370
Hess JF, Kohl TA, Kotrová M et al (2020) Library preparation for next generation sequencing: a review of automation strategies. Biotechnol Adv 41:107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Homthong M, Kubera A, Srihuttagum M, Hongtrakul V (2016) Isolation and characterization of chitinase from soil fungi, Paecilomyces Sp. Agric Nat Resour 50:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2015.09.005
Hospodarova V, Singovszka E, Stevulova N (2018) Characterization of cellulosic fibers by FTIR Spectroscopy for their further implementation to building materials. Am J Anal Chem 9:303–310. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2018.96023
Hudzicki J (2009) Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Am Soc Microbiol 15(1):1–23
Id AB, Id BT, Raj M et al (2023) Assessment of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection methods in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates. PLoS ONE 18:e0294646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
Ivanchenko MV, Indzhykulian AA, Corey DP (2021) Electron Microscopy Techniques for investigating structure and composition of hair-cell Stereociliary bundles. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:744248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.744248
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Iwase T, Tajima A, Sugimoto S et al (2013) A simple assay for measuring catalase activity: a visual approach. Sci Rep 3:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03081
Comments (0)