Darsaut TE, Findlay JM, Bojanowski MW et al (2023) A pragmatic randomized trial comparing Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 44:634–640

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT et al (2008) Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the cerebral aneurysm rerupture after treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 39:120–125

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Darsaut TE, Lecaros N, Comby P-O et al (2024) A randomized trial comparing endovascular and surgical management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms excluded from previous trials. J Neurosurg; In press

Comby PO, Finitsis S, Iancu D et al. (2024) Reliability and applicability of angiographic outcome scales in WEB device-treated aneurysms: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 67(1):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03526-5

McDougall CG, Johnston SC, Gholkar A et al (2014) Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:935–942

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A et al (2011) Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1655–1662

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fahed R, Darsaut TE, Raymond J (2018) The introduction of innovations in Neurovascular Care: patient selection and Randomized Allocation. World Neurosurg 118:e99–e104

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raymond J, Januel AC, Iancu D et al (2020) The RISE trial: a Randomized Trial on Intra-saccular Endobridge devices. Interven Neuroradiol 26:61–67

Article  Google Scholar 

Lubicz B, Klisch J, Gauvrit JY et al (2014) WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:432–438

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Raymond J, Darsaut TE (2022) Reporting the outcomes of medical or surgical treatments: the Tower of Babel. NeuroChirurgie 68:483–484

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raymond J, Benomar A, Darsaut TE (2022) Understanding the reliability of trial outcome measures: the example of angiographic results of surgical or endovascular treatments of aneurysms. NeuroChirurgie 68:485–487

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Darsaut TE, Chapot R, Raymond J (2020) Changing the rules of the game: the Problem of Surrogate Angiographic outcomes in the evaluation of aneurysm treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:2174–2175

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A et al (2003) Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34:1398–1403

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S et al (2011) Guidelines for reporting reliability and Agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 64:96–106

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Donner A, Rotondi MA (2010) Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters. Int J Biostat;6:Article 31

Benomar A, Zarour E, Letourneau-Guillon L et al (2023) Measuring Interrater Reliab Radiol 309:e230492

Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR (1990) High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43:551–558

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43:543–549

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J (2001) Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 32:1998–2004

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jamali S, Fahed R, Gentric JC et al (2016) Inter- and intrarater agreement on the outcome of Endovascular Treatment of aneurysms using MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:879–884

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tollard É, Darsaut TE, Bing F et al (2012) Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:626–631

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Timsit C, Soize S, Benaissa A et al (2016) Contrast-enhanced and Time-of-flight MRA at 3T compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:1684–1689

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Benomar A, Farzin B, Volders D et al (2021) Angiographic results of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and inter-observer reliability study. Neuroradiology 63:1511–1519

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar