GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators, Anderson JA, Ansar A, Antonazzo IC, Arabloo J, Ärnlöv J, et al. Global, regional, and National burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–17.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balaban B, Tok F. Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. PM&R. 2014;6(7):635–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Accident vasculaire cérébral: méthodes de rééducation de La Fonction motrice Chez l’adulte - Argumentaire scientifique. Has. 2012.

Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87987.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wissel J, Ri S. Assessment, goal setting, and botulinum neurotoxin a therapy in the management of post-stroke spastic movement disorder: updated perspectives on best practice. Expert Rev Neurother. 2022;22(1):27–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, Mountain A, Cameron JI, de Jong A et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update. 2019. International Journal of Stroke. 2020;15(7):763–88.

Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–702.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2020;2020(10).

Sczesny-Kaiser M, Trost R, Aach M, Schildhauer TA, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M. A randomized and controlled crossover study investigating the improvement of walking and posture functions in chronic stroke patients using HAL Exoskeleton - The HALESTRO study (HAL-Exoskeleton stroke study). Front Neurosci. 2019;13:259.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: A scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1).

Bergmann J, Krewer C, Jahn K, Müller F. Robot-assisted gait training to reduce pusher behavior: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2018;91(14):e1319–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(1):5–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, Schneeberg A, Teasell R, Yao J, et al. Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):149.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, Neeb M, Shochina M, Katz-Leurer M, et al. The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2009;1(6):516–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watanabe H, Tanaka N, Inuta T, Saitou H, Yanagi H. Locomotion improvement using a hybrid assistive limb in recovery phase stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2006–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watanabe H, Goto R, Tanaka N, Matsumura A, Yanagi H. Effects of gait training using the hybrid assistive Limb® in recovery-phase stroke patients: A 2-month follow-up, randomized, controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):363–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Molteni F, Guanziroli E, Goffredo M, Calabrò RS, Pournajaf S, Gaffuri M et al. Gait Recovery with an Overground Powered Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Subacute Stroke Subjects. 2021; Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci

Calafiore D, Negrini F, Tottoli N, Ferraro F, Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, de Sire A. Efficacy of robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(1):1–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Loro A, Borg MB, Battaglia M, Amico AP, Antenucci R, Benanti P, et al. Balance rehabilitation through Robot-Assisted gait training in Post-Stroke patients: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci. 2023;13(1):92.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kerdraon J, Previnaire JG, Tucker M, Coignard P, Allegre W, Knappen E et al. Evaluation of safety and performance of the self balancing walking system Atalante in patients with complete motor spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021;7(1).

Brun V, Mousbeh Z, Jouet-Pastre B, Benaim C, Kunnert JE, Dhoms G, et al. Évaluation clinique de La Marche de L’hémiplégique vasculaire: proposition D’une modification de La functional ambulation classification. Ann De Réadaptation Et De Médecine Phys. 2000;43(1):14–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen CL, Chen CY, Chen HC, Wu CY, Lin KC, Hsieh YW, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of modified Ashworth scale in patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(6):754–60.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive State.of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Journal officiel de l’Union européenne. RÈGLEMENT (UE) 2017/745. Journal officiel de l’Union européenne [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745

ISO 14155:2020. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects-Good clinical practice [Internet]. 2020. Available from: www.iso.org.

Gagnon DH, Vermette M, Duclos C, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Ahmed S, Kairy D. Satisfaction and perceptions of long-term manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury upon completion of a locomotor training program with an overground robotic exoskeleton. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;14(2):138–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Gage K, Gurucharri K, Robertson R, Stephen K. Establishing the reliability and validity of measurements of walking time using the Emory functional ambulation profile. Phys Ther. 1999;79(12):1122–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(11):1018–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67(6):361–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Altman D, Machin D, Bryant T, Gardner Mdcx. 2008th ed. 2008. (2nd Edition).

Lee EW, Dubin N. Estimation and sample size considerations for clustered binary responses. Stat Med. 1994;13(12):1241–52.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laparidou D, Curtis F, Akanuwe J, Goher K, Niroshan Siriwardena A, Kucukyilmaz A. Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):181.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Massardi S, Pinto-Fernandez D, Babič J, Dežman M, Trošt A, Grosu V, et al. Relevance of hazards in exoskeleton applications: a survey-based enquiry. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):68.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

He Y, Eguren D, Luu TP, Contreras-Vidal JL. Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review. MDER. 2017;10:89–107.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rahamatali M, De Bont N, Valet M, Halkin V, Hanson P, Deltombe T, et al. Post-stroke fatigue: how it relates to motor fatigability and other modifiable factors in people with chronic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg. 2021;121(1):181–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar