Huang W, Chen ACH, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB, Lee YL. Non-coding RNAs as biomarkers for embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24: 5751.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Olszak-Wąsik K, Bednarska-Czerwińska A, Olejek A, Tukiendorf A. From, “every day” hormonal to oxidative stress biomarkers in blood and follicular fluid, to embryo quality and pregnancy success? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:1092415.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rezaeiye RD, Mehrara A, Pour AMA, Fallahi J, Forouhari S. Impact of various parameters as predictors of the success rate of in vitro fertilization. Int J Fertil Steri. 2022;16:76.
Javadzadeh M, Moghadam FR, Erfanifar E, Abadi SHA, Sheikh S, Khazaei R, et al. Evaluation of female infertility and viral diseases: a systematic review of coronaviruses. Sex Disabil. 2024;42:567–89.
Kicińska AM, Maksym RB, Zabielska-Kaczorowska MA, Stachowska A, Babińska A. Immunological and metabolic causes of infertility in polycystic ovary syndrome. Biomedicines. 2023;11: 1567.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang X, Yang L. Current understanding of the genomic abnormities in premature ovarian failure: chance for early diagnosis and management. Front Med Lausanne. 2023;10:1194865.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abebe MS, Afework M, Abaynew Y. Primary and secondary infertility in Africa: systematic review with meta-analysis. Fertil Res Pract. 2020;6:1–11.
Casteleiro Alves MM, Oliani L, Almeida M, Cardoso HJ, Oliani AH, Breitenfeld L, et al. Cell-free DNA as a new biomarker of IVF success, independent of any infertility factor, including endometriosis. Diagnostics. 2023;13: 208.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gnoth C, Maxrath B, Skonieczny T, Friol K, Godehardt E, Tigges J. Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2239–46.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fordham DE, Rosentraub D, Polsky AL, Aviram T, Wolf Y, Perl O, et al. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity? Hum Reprod. 2022;37:2275–90.
Storr A, Venetis CA, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:307–14.
Aparicio-Ruiz B, Basile N, Albalá SP, Bronet F, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1379-85.e10.
Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub4.
Benchaib M, Labrune E, Giscard d’Estaing S, Salle B, Lornage J. Shallow artificial networks with morphokinetic time-lapse parameters coupled to ART data allow to predict live birth. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21:e12486.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Conaghan J, Chen AA, Willman SP, Ivani K, Chenette PE, Boostanfar R, et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(412–9):e5.
Majumdar G, Majumdar A, Verma IC, Upadhyaya KC. Relationship between morphology, euploidy and implantation potential of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10:49–57.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Tsioulou P, Grigoriadis S, Rapani A, et al. PGT-A: who and when? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:1939–57.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Murphy LA, Seidler EA, Vaughan DA, Resetkova N, Penzias AS, Toth TL, et al. To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Hum Reprod. 2019;34:268–75.
Nishihara T, Matsumoto K, Hosoi Y, Morimoto Y. Evaluation of antioxidant status and oxidative stress markers in follicular fluid for human in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17:481–6.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wei Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Li J, Ruan X, Wan Q, et al. Nontargeted metabolomics analysis of follicular fluid in patients with endometriosis provides a new direction for the study of oocyte quality. MedComm. 2023;4:e302.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Przewocki J, Kossiński D, Łukaszuk A, Jakiel G, Wocławek-Potocka I, Ołdziej S, et al. Follicular fluid proteomic analysis to identify predictive markers of normal embryonic development. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25: 8431.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Y, Yang J, Zhang L. The impact of follicular fluid oxidative stress levels on the outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy. Antioxidants. 2023;12: 2117.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Das A, Roychoudhury S. Reactive oxygen species in the reproductive system: sources and physiological roles. In: Roychoudhury S, Agarwal A, editors. Oxidative stress and toxicity in reproductive biology and medicine. 1st ed. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1358. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89340-8_2.
Liang J, Gao Y, Feng Z, Zhang B, Na Z, Li D. Reactive oxygen species and ovarian diseases: antioxidant strategies. Redox Biol. 2023;62:102659.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Saleh I, Coskun S, Al-Rouqi R, Al-Rajudi T, Eltabache C, Abduljabbar M, et al. Oxidative stress and DNA damage status in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Reprod Fertil. 2021;2:117–39.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Orfali R, Alwatban AZ, Orfali RS, Lau L, Chea N, Alotaibi AM, et al. Oxidative stress and ion channels in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Physiol. 2024;15: 1320086.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cinato M, Andersson L, Miljanovic A, Laudette M, Kunduzova O, Borén J, et al. Role of perilipins in oxidative stress—implications for cardiovascular disease. Antioxidants. 2024;13: 209.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Faro DC, Di Pino FL, Monte IP. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of vascular damage: unraveling novel cardiovascular risk factors in Fabry disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25: 8273.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Danciu AM, Ghitea TC, Bungau AF, Vesa CM. The relationship between oxidative stress, selenium, and cumulative risk in metabolic syndrome. In Vivo. 2023;37:2877–87.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu Y, Yu Z, Zhao S, Cheng L, Man Y, Gao X, et al. Oxidative stress markers in the follicular fluid of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome correlate with a decrease in embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:471–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Agarwal A, Aponte-Mellado A, Premkumar BJ, Shaman A, Gupta S. The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:1–31.
Afrough M, Nikbakht R, Hashemitabar M, Ghalambaz E, Amirzadeh S, Zardkaf A, et al. Association of follicular fluid antioxidants activity with aging and in vitro fertilization outcome: a cross-sectional study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2024;18:115.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. In: Methods in enzymology. Vol. 105. Academic Press; 1984. p. 121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3.
Debbarh H, Louanjli N, Aboulmaouahib S, Jamil M, Ahbbas L, Kaarouch I, et al. Antioxidant activities and lipid peroxidation status in human follicular fluid: age-dependent change. Zygote. 2021;29:490–4.
Comments (0)