World Health Organization (WHO). Medical devices: managing the mismatch. Geneva: WHO; 2010. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564045. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). Software as a medical device (SaMD): clinical evaluation. 2017. https://www.imdrf.org/documents/software-medical-device-samd-clinical-evaluation. Accessed 14 Jun 2025.

Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. (Epub 2019 Jan 7).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). Post-market surveillance: IMDRF perspective. https://www.imdrf.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/6.%20Safety%20notices%20and%20Vigilance%20-%20Regulator%27s%20perspective%20M.%20Torres%20%28US%29.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Premarket Notification [510(k)]. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-preparing-correct-submission/premarket-notification-510k. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF). Definition of the term ‘medical device.’ GHTF/SG1/N071:2012. https://www.imdrf.org/sites/default/files/docs/ghtf/archived/sg1/technical-docs/ghtf-sg1-pd-n7r04-definition-of-term-medical-device-110315.doc. Accessed 14 Jun 2025.

Global Harmonization Task Force. Principles of medical devices classification. Geneva: GHTF; 2011. https://www.imdrf.org/sites/default/files/docs/ghtf/final/sg1/technical-docs/ghtf-sg1-n77-2012-principles-medical-devices-classification-121102.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 13485:2016—Medical devices quality management systems: requirements for regulatory purposes. Geneva: ISO; 2016. https://www.iso.org/standard/59752.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

Yoon C, Nam KC, Lee YK, Kang Y, Choi SJ, Shin HM, Jang H, Kim JK, Kwon BS, Ishikawa H, Woo E. Differences in perspectives of medical device adverse events: observational results in training program using virtual cases. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(39): e255. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e255.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Investigational device exemption (IDE). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/how-study-and-market-your-device/investigational-device-exemption-ide. Accessed 14 Jun 2025.

European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices (EU MDR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745. Accessed 14 Jun 2025.

Heneghan C, Thompson M, Billingsley M, Cohen D. Medical-device recalls in the UK and the device-regulation process: retrospective review of safety notices and alerts. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1): e000155. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000155.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Classify your medical device. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/overview-device-regulation/classify-your-medical-device. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

Aranda J, Dobrzynska A, Rosario-Lozano MP, Rejón-Parrilla JC, Epstein D, Blasco-Amaro JA. Regulatory perspectives on post-market evidence generation schemes for high-risk medical devices: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2431234.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol Collaboration, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aaron RE, Tian T, Yeung AM, Huang J, Arreaza-Rubín GA, Ginsberg BH, Kompala T, Lee WA, Kerr D, Colmegna P, Mendez CE, Muchmore DB, Wallia A, Klonoff DC. NIH fifth artificial pancreas workshop 2023: meeting report: the fifth artificial pancreas workshop: enabling fully automation, access, and adoption. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024;18(1):215–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231201829.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14155:2020. clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects—good clinical practice. https://www.iso.org/standard/71690.html. Accessed 12 Jun 2025.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Medical device reporting for manufacturers. 21 CFR Part 803. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-803. Accessed 12 Jun 2025.

European Commission. Guidelines on a medical devices vigilance system. MEDDEV 2.12-1 Rev. 8. 2013. https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-10/md_meddev-guidelines_2_12_1_rev8_en_0.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2025.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14971:2019. Medical devices—Application of risk management to medical devices. https://www.iso.org/standard/72704.html. Accessed 12 Jun 2025.

Kramer DB, Xu S, Kesselheim AS. How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European Union? A systematic review. PLoS Med. 2012;9(7): e1001276.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fleurence RL, Shuren J. Advances in the use of real-world evidence for medical devices: an update from the National Evaluation System for Health Technology. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(1):30–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1380.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices. OJEU. 2017. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

Klar E. Medical device regulation as current challenge for the legally safe introduction of new technologies. Chirurg. 2018;89(10):755–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-018-0705-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Camus D, Thiveaud D, Josseran A, participants of GIENS XXXIV round table “Health Technologies.” New European medical device regulation: how the French ecosystem should seize the opportunity of the EUDAMED and the UDI system, while overcoming the constraints thereof. Therapie. 2019;74(1):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2018.12.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maruyama H, Kondo T. Development and evaluation of new drugs and medical devices in Japan-Standpoint of regulatory agency. Brain Nerve. 2010;62(3):263–8 (Japanese).

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Handa N, Ishii K, Matsui Y, Ando Y. Reporting of cardiovascular medical device adverse events to pharmaceuticals and medical devices agency, Japan. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(9):1211–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.011.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Badnjević A, Pokvić LG, Deumić A, Bećirović LS. Post-market surveillance of medical devices: a review. Technol Health Care. 2022;30(6):1315–29. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-220284.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Health Canada. Medical device problem reporting for health care providers. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2023. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/adverse-reaction-reporting/medical-device/health-care-providers.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2025.

SwissMedic. Regulation of medical devices. https://www.swissmedic.ch/swissmedic/en/home/medical-devices/regulation-of-medical-devices.html. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

SwissMedic. Swissdamed—Swiss database on medical devices. https://www.swissmedic.ch/swissmedic/en/home/medical-devices/medizinprodukte-datenbank.html. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

McGee RG, Webster AC, Rogerson TE, Craig JC. Medical device regulation in Australia: safe and effective? Med J Aust. 2012;196(4):256–60. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja11.11261.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Learn about the Australian Unique Device Identification (UDI) system. https://www.tga.gov.au/how-we-regulate/manufacturing/manufacture-medical-device/unique-device-identification-udi-hub/about-udi-australia. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA). Medical device interim regulations: reporting requirements for adverse events and field safety corrective actions. https://ade.sfda.gov.sa/Home/NcmdrReport. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA). Requirements for safe use of medical devices inside healthcare facilities. https://www.sfda.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2023-07/MDS-REQ3e.pdf. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). Harmonization of medical device reporting and data exchange: enhancing global device safety. Published 2022. https://www.imdrf.org/documents/data-exchange-guidelines-common-data-elements-medical-device-identification. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

McDermott O, Kearney B. The value of using real-world evidence as a source of clinical evidence in the European medical device regulations: a mixed methods study. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024;21(1–2):149–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2291454.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles. Accessed 14 Jun 2025.

Vazirani AA, O’Donoghue O, Brindley D, Meinert E. Blockchain vehicles for efficient medical record management. NPJ Digit Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0211-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). Data exchange guidelines - Common data elements for medical device identification. https://www.imdrf.org/documents/common-data-set-adverse-event-data-exchange-between-imdrf-regulators. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). Guidelines for adverse event reporting. https://www.imdrf.org. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF). Quality management systems and risk management in medical devices. https://www.imdrf.org/ghtf/archived-documents/quality-systems-documents. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unique device identification system. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

World Health Organization (WHO). Patient involvement in medical device safety reporting: a global perspective. Geneva: WHO; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512350. Accessed 06 Feb 2025.

Craig A, O’Meley P, Carter P, et al. The need for greater reporting of medical device incidents. EMJ Innov. 2019;3(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjinnov/10312553.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pane J, Verhamme KMC, Villegas D, Gamez L, Rebollo I, Sturkenboom MCJM. Challenges associated with the safety signal detection process for medical devices. Med Devices (Auckl). 2021;14:43–57. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S278868.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gagliardi AR, Ducey A, Lehoux P, Turgeon T, Ross S, Trbovich P, Easty A, Bell C, Urbach D. Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(3):190–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006481. (Epub 2017 Aug 2).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benjamens S, Dhunnoo P, Meskó B. The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3(1): 118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0.

Article  PubMed