Optimizing infusion-suction diameter ratio (ISDR) in ureteroscopy: in vitro pressure and flow prediction and management

Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Wang K, Li H et al (2018) Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol 5(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.007

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ye Z, Zeng G, Yang H, Tang K, Zhang X, Li H et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones with renal colic: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 73(3):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.033

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM et al (2023) International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 131(2):153–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15836

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeinelabden KM, Abdelhalim E, Galal M, Abdelbaky T, Nabeeh H (2024) Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study. BMC Urol 24(1):288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01644-z

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Punga AM, Ene C, Bulai CA, Georgescu DA, Multescu R, Georgescu DE et al (2024) Complications of single-use flexible ureteroscopy vs. reusable flexible ureteroscopy: a narrative review. Cureus 16(12):e76256. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76256

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yuen SKK, Zhong W, Chan YS, Castellani D, Bhojani N, Agarwal MS et al (2025) Current utility, instruments, and future directions for intrarenal pressure management during ureteroscopy: scoping review by global research in intrarenal pressure collaborative group initiative. Ther Adv Urol 17:17562872251314809. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872251314809

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Giulioni C, Castellani D, Traxer O, Gadzhiev N, Pirola GM, Tanidir Y et al (2024) Experimental and clinical applications and outcomes of using different forms of suction in retrograde intrarenal surgery: results from a systematic review. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 48(1):57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.06.001

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189(2):580–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A et al (2015) Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. World J Urol 33(12):2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhu W, Yuen SKK, Cao J, Chai CA, Liu S, Du J et al (2025) Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study. Clin Transl Discov 5(1):e70031. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctd2.70031

Article  Google Scholar 

Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T et al (2019) The effect of ratio of endoscope–sheath diameter on intrapelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Endourol 33(2):132–139. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0774

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi J, Huang T, Song B, Liu W, Cheng Y, Fang L (2024) The optimal ratio of endoscope–sheath diameter with negative-pressure ureteral access sheath: an in vitro research. World J Urol 42(1):122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04815-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel AU, Aldoukhi AH, Majdalany SE, Plott J, Ghani KR (2021) Development and testing of an anatomic in vitro kidney model for measuring intrapelvic pressure during ureteroscopy. Urology 154:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.024

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J, Wang H, Liang H, Jiang K et al (2024) Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinicalMedicine 74:102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102724

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song B, Jin D, Cheng Y, Wang Z, Wang F, Fang L (2023) What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation. Urolithiasis 51(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01430-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Deng X, Song L, Xie D, Fan D, Zhu L, Yao L et al (2016) A novel flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: an initial experience of 93 cases. J Endourol 30(10):1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0770

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song B, Cheng Y, Lu Y, Rong H, Huang T, Shi J et al (2024) Factors affecting the intraoperative calculi excretion during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis. World J Urol 42(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04794-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sierra A, Corrales M, Kolvatzis M, Panthier F, Piñero A, Traxer O (2022) Thermal injury and laser efficiency with holmium YAG and thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study. J Endourol 36(12):1599–1606. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0216

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anastasiadis A, Koudonas A, Langas G, Tsiakaras S, Memmos D, Mykoniatis I et al (2023) Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: a comprehensive review. Asian J Urol 10(3):258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2023.02.002

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif