Proietti S, Knoll T, Giusti G. Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2016 Dec;36:681–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1743919116311414

Basulto-Martínez M, Klein I, Gutiérrez-Aceves J. The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the future of stone management. Curr Opin Urol [Internet]. 2019 Mar;29(2):96–102. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00042307-201903000-00005

Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martínez M, Suárez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1 cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2022 Jan;8(1):259–70. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405456921000511

Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2016 Mar;69(3):475–82. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0302283815007009

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol [Internet]. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161–9. http://www.jurology.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091

Akram M, Jahrreiss V, Skolarikos A, Geraghty R, Tzelves L, Emilliani E, et al. Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2024 Feb 16;13(4):1114. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1114

Keeley, Jr FX, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA. Clearance of Lower-Pole Stones following Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Effect of the Infundibulopelvic Angle. Eur Urol [Internet]. 1999;36(5):371–5. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/20016

Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, Oztuna D, Unsal A. The Impact of Pelvicaliceal Anatomy on the Success of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Patients With Lower Pole Renal Stones. Urology [Internet]. 2012 Jan;79(1):61–6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429511006868

Dybowski B, Bres-Niewada E, Rzeszutko M, Tkaczyk A, Woźniak B, Wójcik M, et al. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cent Eur J Urol [Internet]. 2021;74(3):437–45. http://ceju.online/journal/2021/flexible-ureteroscopy-nephrolithiasis-Fever-infection-sepsis-2164.php

Qian X, Liu C, Hong S, Xu J, Qian C, Zhu J, et al. Application of Suctioning Ureteral Access Sheath during Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Decreases the Risk of Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Chen T-C, editor. Int J Clin Pract [Internet]. 2022 Mar 12;2022:1–7. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/2022/9354714/

Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Sietz C, Chew BH, Fong KY, et al. Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithi. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2024 May; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405456924000737

Basulto-Martínez M, Proietti S, Pavia MP, Yeow Y, Eisner BH, Giusti G. Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study. Urolithiasis [Internet]. 2023 Jan 17;51(1):32. https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6

Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R. In Vitro Dusting Performance of a New Solid State Thulium Laser Compared to Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. J Endourol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 9;end.2020.0525. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0525

Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Gorgen ARH, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O. How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts. World J Urol [Internet]. 2021 Mar 27;39(3):891–6. https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03241-9

Kwok J-L, De Coninck V, Ventimiglia E, Panthier F, Corrales M, Sierra A, et al. Laser Ablation Efficiency, Laser Ablation Speed, and Laser Energy Consumption During Lithotripsy: What Are They and How Are They Defined? A Systematic Review and Proposal for a Standardized Terminology. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2024 Jul;10(4):599–611. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405456923002225

Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O. What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol [Internet]. 2021 Jan 8;39(1):187–94. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z

Panthier F, Kwok J-L, Tzou DT, Monga M, Traxer O, Keller EX. What is the definition of stone dust and how does it compare with clinically insignificant residual fragments? A comprehensive review. World J Urol [Internet]. 2024 May 4;42(1):292. https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04993-4

Suarez-Ibarrola R, Hein S, Miernik A. Residual stone fragments: clinical implications and technological innovations. Curr Opin Urol [Internet]. 2019 Mar;29(2):129–34. https://journals.lww.com/00042307-201903000-00011

Hein S, Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Adams F, Schlager D, Herrmann TRW, et al. Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them. World J Urol [Internet]. 2016 Jun 23;34(6):771–8. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1713-2

Rippel CA, Nikkel L, Lin YK, Danawala Z, Olorunnisomo V, Youssef RF, et al. Residual Fragments Following Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Incidence and Predictors on Postoperative Computerized Tomography. J Urol [Internet]. 2012 Dec;188(6):2246–51. http://www.jurology.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.040

York NE, Zheng M, Elmansy HM, Rivera ME, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE. Stone-free Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Calculi Utilizing Computed Tomography Imaging. Urology [Internet]. 2019 Feb;124:52–6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429518309543

Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL, Wang AQ, Knudsen BE, Yong C, et al. Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol [Internet]. 2016 Apr;195(4 Part 1):982–6. http://www.jurology.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.009

Kang M, Son H, Jeong H, Cho MC, Cho SY (2016) Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results. World J Urol 34(11):1591–1597

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, Li Y, Chen Z, Hequn C. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World J Urol [Internet]. 2019 May 17;37(5):921–9. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8

Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Ragoori D, Heng CT, Chew BH, et al. A Feasibility Study on Clinical Utility, Efficacy and Limitations of 2 Types of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheaths in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones. Urology [Internet]. 2023 Aug;178:173–9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009042952300479X

Zhang Z, Xie T, Li F, Wang X, Liu F, Jiang B, et al. Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi. World J Urol [Internet]. 2023 Oct 11;41(12):3619–27. https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w

Ding J, Su T, Zhang X, Qian S, Duan L, Huang Y, et al. Omnidirectional (Flexible) Ureteral Access Sheath: Safety, Efficacy, and Initial Experience Report. J Endourol [Internet]. 2023 Nov 1;37(11):1184–90. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0358