Evaluating the Methodological Rigor and Recommendation Excellence of TAVR Guidelines: Insights from AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments

Avvedimento M, Tang GHL. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): recent updates. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;69:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695–705. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1814052.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1321–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700456.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103510.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gargiulo G, Sannino A, Capodanno D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):334–44. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0060.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1686–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200384.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest. 2013;144(2):381–9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-0746.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Genereux P, Cohen DJ, Williams MR, et al. Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(11):1100–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.058.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arora S, Strassle PD, Qamar A, et al. Trends in inpatient complications after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(11):e007517. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007517.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thonghong T, De Backer O, Sondergaard L. Comprehensive update on the new indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the latest 2017 European guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Open Heart. 2018;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000753.

Singh M, Sporn ZA, Schaff HV, et al. ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines on prosthetic heart valve management JACC guideline comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(13):1707–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.038.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khanji MY, Ricci F, Galusko V, et al. Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations. European Heart Journal Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes. 2021;7(4):340–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab016.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2022;17(14):E1126-E1196. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00009.

Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162(2):E183–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Working Group of Structural Heart Diseases, Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert recommendation on the transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic stenosis. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020;48(8):634–640. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200225-00126.

Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(12):1308–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sanclemente G, Acosta JL, Tamayo ME, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of acne vulgaris: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Arch Dermatol Res. 2014;306(3):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-013-1394-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brouwers MC, Spithoff K, Kerkvliet K, et al. Development and validation of a tool to assess the quality of clinical practice guideline recommendations. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e205535. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5535.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Niu M, Gao Y, Yang M, et al. The quality and clinical applicability of recommendations in anxiety disorders guidelines: a systematic review of seventeen guidelines from seven countries. J Affect Disord. 2021;295:1301–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elliott JH, Synnot A, Turner T, et al. Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017;91:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tarantini G, Tang G, Fovino LN, et al. Management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions in collaboration with the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery. EuroIntervention:Jjournal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023;19(1):37–52. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-22-00958.

National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Center for Quality Control of Structural Heart Disease Intervention, Chinese Society of Cardiology, et al. Chinese guideline for the clincal application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023;103(12):886–900. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221106-02332.

Hitzeroth J, Weich H, Scherman J. 2022 SASCI/SCTSSA joint consensus statement and guideline on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in South Africa. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2022;33(5):267–9. https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2022-049.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dayan V, García-Villarreal OA, Almeida R, et al. Declaración de la Latinoamerican Association of Cardiac & Endovascular Surgery (LACES) sobre las guías de la AHA/ACC para el manejo de la enfermedad valvular 2020 regarding the 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Revista Colombiana de Cardiología. 2022;29(4):421–424. https://doi.org/10.24875/RCCAR.21000013.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Heart valve disease presenting in adults: investigation and management. NICE guideline [NG208]. 2021. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng208. Accessed 15 June 2024.

Von Scheidt W, Welz A, Pauschinger M, et al. Interdisciplinary consensus on indications for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) Joint Consensus Document of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte e.V. (ALKK) and cooperating Cardiac Surgery Departments. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2020;109(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01528-5.

Tay EL, Hayashida K, Chen M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical expert opinion and consensus statement for Asia. J Card Surg. 2020;35(9):2142–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14722.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tarasoutchi F, Montera MW, Ramos AIO, et al. Update of the brazilian guidelines for valvular heart disease – 2020. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2020;115(4):720–775. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20201047.

Kuck KH, Bleiziffer S, Eggebrecht H, et al. Consensus paper of the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG) on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) 2020. Kardiologe. 2020;14(3):182–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-020-00398-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Izumi C, Eishi K, Ashihara K, et al. JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Circ J. 2020;84(11):2037–119. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0135.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Valve-in-valve TAVI for aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. NICE interventional procedures guidance [IPG653]. 2019. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg653. Accessed 15 June 2024.

Parma R, Zembala MO, Dabrowski M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Consensus of the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society and the Polish Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons, approved by the Board of the Polish Cardiac Society and National Consultants in Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Kardiologia polska. 2017;75(9):937–964. https://doi.org/10.5603/KP.2017.0175.

Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. 2017 ACC Expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis a report of the American College of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(10):1313–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis. NICE Interventional procedures guidance [IPG586]. 2017. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg586. Accessed: 15 June 2024.

Bonow RO, Brown AS, Gillam LD, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis: a report of the American College of Cardiology appropriate use criteria task force, American Association for thoracic surgery, American heart association, American Society of echocardiography, European Association for cardio-thoracic surgery, heart valve society, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of cardiovascular computed tomography, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and society of thoracic surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(20):2566–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.018.

Article  PubMed 

Comments (0)

No login
gif