Aguilar I, Fernandez EN, Blasco A et al (2020) Effects of ignoring inbreeding in model-based accuracy for BLUP and SSGBLUP. J Anim Breed Genet 137:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12470

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Asada Y, Terawaki Y (2002) Heritability and repeatability of superovulatory responses in Holstein population in Hokkaido, Japan. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci 15:944–948. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.944

Article  Google Scholar 

Ayres DR, Pereira RJ, Boligon AA et al (2013) Linear and Poisson models for genetic evaluation of tick resistance in cross-bred Hereford x Nellore cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 130:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12036

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bényei B, Gáspàrdy A, Komlósi I, Pécsi A (2004) Repeatability and heritability of ovulation number and embryos in dam-daughters pairs in superovulated Holstein-Friesian cows. Reprod Domest Anim 39:99–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00487.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cornelissen MAMC, Mullaart E, Van der Linde C, Mulder HA (2017) Estimating variance components and breeding values for number of oocytes and number of embryos in dairy cattle using a single-step genomic evaluation. J Dairy Sci 100:4698–4705. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12075

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feltes GL, Michelotti VT, Oliveira MM et al (2022) Impact of different numbers of milk test-day records during lactation on the reliability of estimated breeding values. Trop Anim Health Prod 54:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03288-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Geweke J (1991) Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Staff Report 148, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Gorjanc G, Bijma P, Hickey JM (2015) Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations. Genet Sel Evol 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0145-1

Hadfield JD, Nakagawa S (2010) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J Evol Biol 23:494–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heidelberger P, Welch PD (1983) Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper Res 31:1109–1144. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.31.6.1109

Article  Google Scholar 

Jaton C, Koeck A, Sargolzaei M et al (2016a) Genetic analysis of superovulatory response of Holstein cows in Canada. J Dairy Sci 99:3612–3623. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10349

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jaton C, Koeck A, Sargolzaei M et al (2016b) Short communication: genetic correlations between number of embryos produced using in vivo and in vitro techniques in heifer and cow donors. J Dairy Sci 99:8222–8226. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11356

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

König S, Bosselmann F, von Borstel UU, Simianer H (2007) Genetic analysis of traits affecting the success of embryo transfer in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 90:3945–3954. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0089

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merton JS, Ask B, Onkundi DC et al (2009) Genetic parameters for oocyte number and embryo production within a bovine ovum pick-up-in vitro production embryo-production program. Theriogenology 72:885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.06.003

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naya H, Urioste JI, Chang Y-M et al (2008) A comparison between Poisson and zero-inflated Poisson regression models with an application to number of black spots in Corriedale sheep. Genet Sel Evol 40:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2008010

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oliveira H, Brito L, Silva F et al (2019) Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 102:452–463. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15159

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panetto JCCCC, Gutiérrez JPP, Ferraz JBSBS et al (2010) Assessment of inbreeding depression in a Guzerat dairy herd: effects of individual increase in inbreeding coefficients on production and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 93:4902–4912. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3197

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parker Gaddis KL, Dikmen S, Null DJJ et al (2017) Evaluation of genetic components in traits related to superovulation, in vitro fertilization, and embryo transfer in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 100:2877–2891. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11907

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perez BC, Peixoto MGCD, Bruneli FT et al (2016) Genetic analysis of oocyte and embryo production traits in Guzerá breed donors and their associations with age at first calving. Genet Mol Res 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15027583

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Perez BC, Silva FF, Ventura RV et al (2017) Count Bayesian models for genetic analysis of in vitro embryo production traits in Guzerá cattle. Animal 11:1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700012X

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R news 6(1):7–11

Google Scholar 

R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL https://www.R-project.org/

Raftery AE, Lewis SM (1991) Comment: one long run with diagnostics: implementation strategies for Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Stat Sci 7:493–497

Google Scholar 

Santos DJA, Peixoto MGCD, Aspilcueta Borquis RR et al (2014) Predicting breeding values for milk yield of Guzerá (Bos indicus) cows using random regression models. Livest Sci 167:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.023

Article  Google Scholar 

Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian deviance with discussion JRSSB 2002. Appl Stat 46:261–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986270

Article  Google Scholar 

Tonhati H, Lôbo RB, Oliveira HN (1998) Repeatability and heritability of response to superovulation in Holstein cows. Theriogenology 51:1151–1156

Article  Google Scholar 

Ventura HT, e Silva FF, Varona L et al (2015) Comparing multi-trait Poisson and Gaussian Bayesian models for genetic evaluation of litter traits in pigs. Livest Sci 176:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.030

Article  Google Scholar 

Viana JHM (2019) Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Divergent trends for IVD and IVP embryos. Embryo Technology Newsletter 38(4):2020

Vizoná RG, da Costa PB, Campolina Diniz Peixoto MG et al (2020) Genetic analysis of in-vitro embryo production traits in dairy Gir cattle. Theriogenology 148:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.02.014

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar