1. Lindahl, H, Malchau, H, Herberts, P, Garellick, G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures: Classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty register. J Arthroplas. 2005;20(7):857-865. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Capone, A, Congia, S, Civinini, R, Marongiu, G. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017;14(2):189-196. doi:10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.189.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Abdel, MP, Houdek, MT, Watts, CD, Lewallen, DG, Berry, DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint Lett J. 2016;98-B(4):468-474. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Chatziagorou, G, Lindahl, H, Garellick, G, et al. Incidence and demographics of 1751 surgically treated periprosthetic femoral fractures around a primary hip prosthesis. HIP Int. 2019;29(3):282-288. doi:10.1177/1120700018779558.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI5. Singh, JA, Jensen, MR, Lewallen, DG. Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplas. 2012;27(8):1507-1512. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.010.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Meek, RMD, Norwood, T, Smith, R, Brenkel, IJ, Howie, CR. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg-Ser B. 2011;93 B(1):96-101. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25087.
Google Scholar | Crossref7. Kim, YH, Mansukhani, SA, Kim, JS, Park, JW. Use of locking plate and strut onlay allografts for periprosthetic fracture around well-fixed femoral components. J Arthroplas. 2017;32(1):166-170. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.064.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Abdel, MP, Cottino, U, Mabry, TM. Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop. 2015;39(10):2005-2010. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2979-0.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Chatziagorou, G, Lindahl, H, Kärrholm, J. Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: Patient characteristics and outcomes of 1381 fractures treated in Sweden between 2001 and 2011. Bone Jt J. 2019;101-B(11):1447-1458. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0480.R2.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Dargan, D, Jenkinson, MJ, Acton, JD. A retrospective review of the dall-miles plate for periprosthetic femoral fractures: Twenty-seven cases and a review of the literature. Injury. 2014;45(12):1958-1963. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.034.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Duncan, CP, Masri, BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293-304.
Google Scholar | Medline12. Haddad, FS, Duncan, CP. Classification. In: M, Schütz, C, Perka, T, Ruedi, eds. Periprosthetic Fracture Management. Stuttgart, New York, Delhi, Rio: Thieme Verlagsgruppe; 2013:47-90.
Google Scholar13. Duncan, CP, Haddad, FS. The unified classification system (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Jt J. 2014;96-B(6):713-716. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Masri, BA, Meek, RMD, Duncan, CP. Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004:80-95. doi:10.1097/00003086-200403000-00012.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Giannoudis, PV, Kanakaris, NK, Tsiridis, E. Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. 2007;38(6):669-687. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.050.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Tsiridis, E, Pavlou, G, Venkatesh, R, Bobak, P, Gie, G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: Current concepts in their management. HIP Int. 2009;19(2):75-86. doi:10.1177/112070000901900201.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI17. Van Houwelingen, AP, Duncan, CP. The pseudo A(LT) periprosthetic fracture: It’s really a B2. Orthopedics. 2011;34(9):e479-e481. doi:10.3928/01477447-20110714-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Capello, WN, D’Antonio, JA, Naughton, M. Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: A new fracture pattern is described. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol 472. New York, LLC: Springer; 2014:604-610. 10.1007/s11999-013-3137-x.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Watts, CD, Abdel, MP, Lewallen, DG, Berry, DJ, Hanssen, AD. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2045-2053. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Chatziagorou, G, Lindahl, H, Kärrholm, J. The design of the cemented stem influences the risk of Vancouver type B fractures, but not of type C: an analysis of 82,837 lubinus SPII and exeter polished stems. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(2):135-142. doi:10.1080/17453674.2019.1574387.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Quah, C, Porteous, M, Stephen, A. Principles of managing vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(4):477-482. doi:10.1007/s00590-016-1883-7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Fenelon, C, Murphy, EP, Baig, MN, Kearns, SR, Murphy, CG, Curtin, W. Breaking bad: a comparative descriptive analysis of periprosthetic fractures around cemented and uncemented femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 2019;34(8):1783-1786. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Mondanelli, N, Facchini, A, Troiano, E, Muratori, F, Bottai, V, Giannotti, S. Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures Exist: A Retrospective Study at a Single Institution. Prevalence on 115 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Around a Primary Hip Stem. J Arthroplasty 2021;36(6):2189-2196.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Troiano, E, Giacché, T, Facchini, A et al. Surgical and pharmacological management of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures: a narrative literature review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil submitted.
Google Scholar25. Caruso, G, Milani, L, Marko, T, Lorusso, V, Andreotti, M, Massari, L. Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study with functional and radiological outcomes from 2010 to 2016. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(5):931-938. doi:10.1007/s00590-017-2082-x.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Froberg, L, Troelsen, A, Brix, M. Periprosthetic vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(6):648-652. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.747925.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Lindahl, H, Malchau, H, Odén, A, Garellick, G. Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg-Ser B. 2006;88(1):26-30. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17029.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Randelli, F, Pace, F, Priano, D, Giai Via, A, Randelli, P. Re-fractures after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A difficult to treat growing evidence. Injury. 2018;49(suppl 3):S43-S47. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.045.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Spina, M, Rocca, G, Canella, A, Scalvi, A. Causes of failure in periprosthetic fractures of the hip at 1- to 14-year follow-up. Injury. 2014;45(suppl 6):S85-S92. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.029.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Laurer, HL, Wutzler, S, Possner, S, et al. Outcome after operative treatment of vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: Open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(7):983-989. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1272-y.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Zuurmond, RG, van Wijhe, W, van Raay, JJAM, Bulstra, SK. High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: An analysis of 71 cases. Injury. 2010;41(6):629-633. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.102.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI32. Jones, AR, Williams, T, Paringe, V, White, SP. The economic impact of surgically treated peri-prosthetic hip fractures on a university teaching hospital in Wales 7.5-year study. Injury. 2016;47(2):428-431. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.012.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Ekegren, CL, Edwards, ER, de Steiger, R, Gabbe, BJ. Incidence, costs and predictors of non-union, delayed union and mal-union following long bone fracture. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2018;15(12):2845. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122845.
Google Scholar | Crossref34. King, SW, Lamb, JN, Cage, ES, Pandit, H. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Maturitas. 2018;117:1-5. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Raab, GE, Davis, CM. Early healing with locked condylar plating of periprosthetic fractures around the knee. J Arthroplas. 2005;20(8):984-989. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.040.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Bhattacharya, T, Chang, D, Meigs, JB, Estok, DM, Malchau, H. Mortaility after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg. 2007;89(12):2658-2662. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01538.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Füchtmeier, B, Galler, M, Müller, F. Mid-term results of 121 periprosthetic femoral fractures: Increased failure and mortality within but not after one postoperative year. J Arthroplas. 2015;30(4):669-674. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.006.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Goudie, ST, Patil, S, Patton, JT, Keating, JF. Outcomes following osteosynthesis of periprosthetic hip fractures around cemented tapered polished stems. Injury. 2017;48(10):2194-2200. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.017.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Young, SW, Pandit, S, Munro, JT, Pitto, RP. Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(6):424-428. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04087.x.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Mondanelli, N, Troiano, E, Facchini, A, Colasanti, GB, Giannotti, S. Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil submitted.
Google Scholar41. Bates, BD, Walmsley, DW, Vicente, MR, et al. An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties. Injury. 2018;49(2):364-369. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.034.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Dehghan, N, McKee, MD, Nauth, A, Ristevski, B, Schemitsch, EH. Surgical fixation of vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: A systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(12):721-727. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000126.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI43. Stoffel, K, Sommer, C, Kalampoki, V, Blumenthal, A, Joeris, A. The influence of the operation technique and implant used in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and interprosthetic femur fractures: a systematic literature review of 1571 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(4):553-561. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2407-y.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Ruchholtz, S, El-Zayat, B, Kreslo, D, et al. Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur-A prospective study of 41 patients. Injury. 2013;44(2):239-248. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.035.