1. Ziegler-Graham, K, MacKenzie, EJ, Ephraim, PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89(3): 422–429.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Carey, SL., Lura, DJ, Highsmith, MJ. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Development 2015; 52: 247–262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Stevens, PM, Highsmith, MJ. Myoelectric and body power, design options for upper-limb prostheses: introduction to the state of the science conference proceedings. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29(4s): 1–3.
Google Scholar | Crossref4. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Upper Extremity Amputation Rehabilitation, Version 1.0. US Department of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Defense. 2014 https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Rehab/UEAR/VADoDCPGManagementofUEAR121614Corrected508.pdf
Google Scholar5. Uellendahl, J . Myoelectric versus body-powered upper-limb prostheses: a clinical perspective. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29(4s): 25–29.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Melton, DH . Physiatrist perspective on upper-limb prosthetic options: using practice guidelines to promote patient education in the selection and the prescription process. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29(4s): 40–44.
Google Scholar | Crossref7. Geertzen, J., van der Linde, H., Rosenbrand, K., et al. Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: amputation surgery and postoperative management. Part 1. Prosthetics Orthotics Int 2015; 39(5): 351–360.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI8. Geertzen, J., van der Linde, H., Rosenbrand, K., et al. Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: rehabilitation process and prosthetics. Part 2. Prosthetics Orthotics Int 2015; 39(5): 361–371.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI9. Stevens, P, Rheinstein, J, Campbell, J. Acute postoperative care of the residual limb following transtibial amputation: a clinical practice guideline. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(10): e21.
Google Scholar10. Stevens, P, Rheinstein, J, Wurdeman, S. Prosthetic foot selection for individuals with lower limb amputation: a clinical practice guideline. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(10): e21–e22.
Google Scholar11. Stevens, PM, DePalma, RR, Wurdeman, SR. Transtibial socket design, interface, and suspension: a clinical practice guideline. JPO J Prosthetics Orthotics 2019; 31(3): 172–178.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Sedki, I, Fisher, K. Developing prescribing guidelines for microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees in the South East England. Prosthetics Orthotics Int 2015; 39(3): 250–254.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI13. Stevens, PM, Wurdeman, SR. Prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation: a clinical practice guideline. JPO J Prosthetics Orthotics 2019; 31(1): 2–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Falbo, KJ, Brinkmann, J. Characteristics of delphi processes in orthotics and prosthetics research. JPO J Prosthetics Orthotics 2020; 32: 161–174. DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000287.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Linde, Hvd, Hofstad, CJ, Geurts, ACH, et al. A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Development 2004; 41(4): 555–570.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Keeney, S, Hasson, F, McKenna, HP. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Google Scholar | Crossref17. Keeney, S, Hasson, F, McKenna, HP. A critical review of the delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2001; 38(2): 195–200.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Linde, Hvd, Hofstad, CJ, Limbeek, Jv, et al. Use of the delphi technique for developing national clinical guidelines for prescription of lower limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Development 2005; 42(5): 693–704.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Schaffalitzky, E, Gallagher, P, Maclachlan, M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34(24): 2085–2094.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Weber, D . The development of an orthotic management protocol for preambulatory children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. JPO J Prosthetics Orthotics 1994; 6(3): 67–70.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Lin, RS, Stevens, PM, Wininger, M, et al. Orthotic management of deformational plagiocephaly: consensus clinical standards of care. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 2016; 53(4): 394–403.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI22. Baars, EC, Schrier, E, Geertzen, JH, et al. Biomedical and psychosocial factors influencing transtibial prosthesis fit: a delphi survey among health care professionals. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37(21): 1946–1954.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Carey, SL, Stevens, PM, Highsmith, MJ. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review update 2013–2016. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29(4s): 17–20.
Google Scholar | Crossref24. Hsu, CC, Sandford, BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 2007; 12(10): 1–8.
Google Scholar25. American Board for Certification . Practice Analysis of Certified Practitioners in the Disciplines of Orthotics and Prosthetics, 2019, https://www.abcop.org/individual-certification/Documents/Practitioner%20Practice%20Analysis.pdf (accessed 10 Jun 2020).
Google Scholar26. Powell, C . The delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41(4): 376–382.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI27. Baker, J, Lovell, K, Harris, N. How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘expert’ within delphi panel techniques. Nurse Res 2006; 14(1): 59–70.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Fink, A, Kosecoff, J, Chassin, M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984; 74(9): 979–983.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Davis, C, Onge, StM. Myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: the users’ perspective. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29(4S): 30–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref