1. Ernst, MO, Bülthoff, HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8: 162–169.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Makin, TR, Holmes, NP, Zohary, E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 731–740.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Giummarra, MJ, Gibson, SJ, Georgiou-Karistianis, N, et al. Mechanisms underlying embodiment, disembodiment and loss of embodiment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008; 32: 143–160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Lopez, C, Halje, P, Blanke, O. Body ownership and embodiment: vestibular and multisensory mechanisms. Neurophysiol Clinic Neurophysiol 2008; 38: 149–161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Diederich, A, Colonius, H, Schomburg, A. Assessing age-related multisensory enhancement with the time-window-of-integration model. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 2556–2562.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Laurienti, PJ, Burdette, JH, Maldjian, JA, et al. Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2006; 27: 1155–1163.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Mahoney, JR, Li, PCC, Oh-Park, M, et al. Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults. Brain Res 2011; 1426: 43–53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Mahoney, JR, Holtzer, R, Verghese, J. Visual-somatosensory integration and balance: evidence for psychophysical integrative differences in aging. Multisensory Res 2014; 27: 17–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Mahoney, JR, Wang, C, Dumas, K, et al. Visual-somatosensory integration in aging: does stimulus location really matter? Vis Neurosci 2014; 31: 275–283.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Peiffer, AM, Mozolic, JL, Hugenschmidt, CE, et al. Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task. NeuroReport 2007; 18: 1077–1081.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. de Dieuleveult, AL, Siemonsma, PC, van Erp, JBF, et al. Effects of aging in multisensory integration: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9: 80.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Freiherr, J, Lundström, JN, Habel, U, et al. Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 863.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Costello, MC, Bloesch, EK. Are older adults less embodied? A review of age effects through the lens of embodied cognition. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Vallet, GT . Embodied cognition of aging. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 463.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Kuehn, E, Perez-Lopez, MB, Diersch, N, et al. Embodiment in the aging mind. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 86: 207–225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Riva, G, Wiederhold, BK, Mantovani, F. Neuroscience of virtual reality: from virtual exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2019; 22: 82–96.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Mann, J . The medical avatar and its role in neurorehabilitation and neuroplasticity: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 2020; 46: 467–482.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Campos, JL, Nusseck, H-G, Wallraven, C, et al. Visualization and (Mis)perceptions in virtual reality. Tagungsband 10. In: Möller, R, Shaker, R (eds) Proceedings of Workshop Sichtsysteme. Aachen, Germany. pp. 10–14.
Google Scholar19. Renner, RS, Velichkovsky, BM, Helmert, JR. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review. ACM Comput Surv 2013; 46(23): 1–2340.
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Harris, DJ, Buckingham, G, Wilson, MR, et al. Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action. Exp Brain Res 2019; 237: 2761–2766.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Norman, JF, Dawson, TE, Butler, AK. The effects of age upon the perception of depth and 3-D shape from differential motion and binocular disparity. Perception 2000; 29: 1335–1359.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI22. Holmin, J, Nawrot, M. The effects of aging on the perception of depth from motion parallax. Attent Percept Psychophys 2016; 78: 1681–1691.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Botvinick, M, Cohen, J. Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 1998; 391: 756.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Makin, TR, Holmes, NP, Ehrsson, HH. On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav Brain Res 2008; 191: 1–10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI25. Tsakiris, M, Haggard, P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Perception Perform 2005; 31: 80–91.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Campos, JL, El-Khechen Richandi, G, Taati, B, et al. The rubber hand illusion in healthy younger and older adults. Multisens Res 2017; 31: 537–555.
Google Scholar | Crossref27. Shimada, S, Fukuda, K, Hiraki, K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLOS ONE 2009; 4: e6185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Bekrater-Bodmann, R, Foell, J, Diers, M, et al. The importance of synchrony and temporal order of visual and tactile input for illusory limb ownership experiences - an fmri study applying virtual reality. PLOS ONE 2014; 9: e87013.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Costantini, M, Robinson, J, Migliorati, D, et al. Temporal limits on rubber hand illusion reflect individuals’ temporal resolution in multisensory perception. Cognition 2016; 157: 39–48.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Abdulkarim, Z, Ehrsson, HH. No causal link between changes in hand position sense and feeling of limb ownership in the rubber hand illusion. Atten Percep Psychophys 2016; 78: 707–720.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Holmes, NP, Snijders, HJ, Spence, C. Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Percep Psychophys 2006; 68: 685–701.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Maselli, A, Kilteni, K, López-Moliner, J, et al. The sense of body ownership relaxes temporal constraints for multisensory integration. Scientific Rep 2016; 6: 30628.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Rohde, M, Di Luca, M, Ernst, MO. The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLOS ONE 2011; 6: e21659.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI34. Samad, M, Chung, AJ, Shams, L. Perception of body ownership is driven by Bayesian sensory inference. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0117178.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Hägni, K, Eng, K, Hepp-Reymond, M-C, et al. Observing virtual arms that you imagine are yours increases the galvanic skin response to an unexpected threat. PLOS ONE 2008; 3: e3082.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Raz, L, Weiss, PL, Reiner, M. The virtual hand illusion and body ownership. In: Ferre, M (ed) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008, pp. 367–372.
Google Scholar | Crossref37. Slater, M, Perez-Marcos, D, Ehrsson, HH, et al. Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Front Hum Neurosci 2008; 2: 6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Sanchez-Vives, MV, Spanlang, B, Frisoli, A, et al. Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLOS ONE 2010; 5: e10381.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI39. Yuan, Y, Steed, A. Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? In: 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR), Waltham, MA, , pp. 95–102.
Google Scholar | Crossref40. Pomés, A, Slater, M. Drift and ownership toward a distant virtual body. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 908.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Argelaguet, F, Hoyet, L, Trico, M, et al. The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: effects of the virtual hand representation. In: 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), Greenville, SC, , pp. 3–10.
Google Scholar | Crossref42. Kanayama, N, Hara, M, Kimura, K. Virtual reality alters cortical oscillations related to visuo-tactile integration during rubber hand illusion. Scientific Rep 2021; 11: 1436.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline43. IJsselsteijn, WA, de Kort, YAW, Haans, A. Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence Teleoperat Virtual Environ 2006; 15: 455–464.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI44. Padilla, MA, Pabon, S, Frisoli, A, et al. Hand and arm ownership illusion through virtual reality physical interaction and vibrotactile Stimulations. In: Kappers, AML, van Erp, JBF, Bergmann Tiest, WM, et al. (eds) Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010, pp. 194–199.
Google Scholar | Crossref45. Banakou, D, Groten, R, Slater, M. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013; 110: 12846–12851.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI46. Peck, TC, Seinfeld, S, Aglioti, SM, et al. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious Cogn 2013; 22: 779–787.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI47. Slater, M, Spanlang, B, Sanchez-Vives, MV, et al. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLOS ONE 2010; 5: e10564.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI48. Marotta, A, Zampini, M, Tinazzi, M, et al. Age-related changes in the sense of body ownership: new insights from the rubber hand illusion. PLOS ONE 2018; 13: e0207528.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Palomo, P, Borrego, A, Cebolla, A, et al. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological responses to the rubber hand illusion do not vary with age in the adult phase. Conscious Cogn 2018; 58: 90–96.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline