Postoperative complication rates of surgeons during the supervised training program in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery

Akerman SJ, Daniel S, Baik R, Liu E, Mehendale S, Tackett S et al (2018) Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery? J Med Econ 21(3):254–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2017.1396994

Article  Google Scholar 

Alves Martins BA, Filho OM, Ghezzi TL, Melani AGF, Romagnolo LGC, Moreira Júnior H, de Almeida JPP, Araújo SEA, de Sousa JB, de Almeida RM (2023) An overview of robotic colorectal surgery adoption and training in Brazil. Medicina (Kaunas) 59(9):1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091675

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Azadi S, Green IC, Arnold A et al (2021) Robotic surgery: the impact of simulation and other innovative platforms on performance and training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(3):490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bastawrous AL, Bossie H, Shih IF, Li Y, Soliman M, Clearly RK (2024) The impact of standardized robotics course training during colorectal surgery fellowship on post-training practice: a survey of graduates. J Robotic Surg 18(1):365

Article  Google Scholar 

Brar G, Xu S, Anwar M, Talajia K, Ramesh N, Arshad SR (2024) Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions. J Robot Surg 18(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01837-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cao L, Yang Z, Qi L, Chen M (2019) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(22):e15770. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015770

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Siu KC, Oleynikov D, Force SRT (2020) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34(1):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06775-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, Makuuchi M et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deena H, Houston F, Burke J, Griffiths B, Tilney H, Miskovic D, Evans C, Khan J, Soomro N, Bach SP (2023) The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programs. J Robot Surg 17(2):251–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01421-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Denadai MVA, Melani AGF, Neto MC, Romagnolo LGC, Diniz FD, Véo CAR (2021) Robotic rectal surgery: outcomes of the first 102 totally robotic cases handled using the single-docking technique in a reference institution. J Surg Oncol 123(4):997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26351

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fadel MG, Walshaw J, Pecchini F, Elhadi M, Yiasemidou M, Boal M et al (2024) European robotic surgery consensus (ERSC): protocol for the development of a consensus in robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery trainees. PLoS ONE 19(5):e0302648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302648

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, Tang B, Jia B, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Zhao R, Zhang C, Cheng L et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(11):991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gauci C, Zahid A, Revindran P, Lynch AC, Pillinger S (2024) Preceptorship in robotic colorectal surgery: experience from the Australian private sector. J Robotic Surg 18(1):213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01972-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Gonçalves MR, Mück B, Faure J-P, Topart P, Sousa MCB (2024) RoboticSurgery4all: are discovery courses important for robotic surgery skills acquisition? J Robotic Surg 18(1):322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02077-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Harji D, Houston F, Burke J, Griffiths B, Tilney H, Miskovic D et al (2023) The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programs. J Robot Surg 17(2):251–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01421-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holmer C, Kreis ME (2018) Systematic review of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32(2):569–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5978-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7219

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kassite I, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Lardy H, Binet A (2019) A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity. Surg Endosc 33(2):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim HJ, Choi G-S, Park JS, Park SY, Yang CS, Lee HJ (2018) The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 20(5):O103–O113. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14051

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koc MA, Thomas MS, Mavrantonis S, Panteleimonitis S, Harper M, Sanjay C et al (2024) Structured training pathway for robotic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes from five UK centers. Colorectal Dis 26(11):1965–1970. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17179

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leal Ghezzi T, Corleta OC (2016) 30 years of robotic surgery. World J Surg 40(10):2550–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee K-G, Lee H-J, Yang H-Y, Oh S-Y, Bard S, Suh Y-S et al (2014) Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien-Dindo system. J Gastrointest Surg 18(7):1269–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2525-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, Yuan Y, Gao G, Liang Y, Li T, Li T (2023) Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for colon cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching analysis. J Robot Surg 17(6):3025–3033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01741-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martins RS, Fatimi AS, Mahmud O, Mahar UM, Jahangir A, Jawed K et al (2024) Quality of life after robotic versus conventional minimally invasive cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 18(1):171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01916-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moreira LF, Pessôa MCM, Mattana DS, Schimtz FF, Volkweis BS, Antoniazzi JL, Ribeiro L (2016) Cultural adaptation and the Clavien-Dindo surgical complications classification translated to Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Col Bras Cir 43(3):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016003001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pérez-Salazar MJ, Caballero D, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2024) Comparative study of ergonomics in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Sensors (Basel) 24(12):3840. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123840

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rahimi AM, Uluç E, Hardon SF, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Daams F (2024) Training in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of training modalities and objective and subjective assessment methods. Surg Endosc 38(7):3547–3555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10915-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Seow W, Dudi-Venkata NN, Bedrikovetski S, Kroon HM, Sammour T (2023) Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 27(5):345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sinha A, West A, Vasdev N, Sooriakumaran P, Rane A, Dasgupta P, McKirdy M (2023) Current practises and the future of robotic surgical training. Surgeon 21(5):314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.006

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif