United States Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Patient-focused drug development: Selecting, developing, or modifying fit-for purpose clinical outcome assessments. Guidance for industry, food and drug administration staff, and other stakeholders. DRAFT GUIDANCE.

Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., Schwartz, C., Revicki, D. A., Moinpour, C. M., & McLeod, L. D. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1889–1905.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

United States Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Patient-focused drug development: Incorporating clinical outcome assessments into endpoints for regulatory decision-making. Guidance for industry, food and drug administration staff, and other stakeholders. DRAFT GUIDANCE.

Ren, J., Bushmakin, A. G., Cislo, P. R., Abraham, L., Cappelleri, J. C., Dworkin, R. H., & Farrar, J. T. (2024). Meaningful within-patient change for clinical outcome assessments: model-based approach versus cumulative distribution functions. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 13, 1–13.

Google Scholar 

Speck, R. M., Yu, R., Ford, J. H., Ayer, D. W., Bhandari, R., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2021). Psychometric validation and meaningful within-patient change of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire version 21 electronic patient-reported outcome in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 61(3), 511–526.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lansdall, C. J., McDougall, F., Butler, L., Delmar, P., Pross, N., Qin, S., McLeod, L., Zhou, X., Kerchner, G., & Doody, R. (2023). Establishing clinically meaningful change on outcome assessments frequently used in trials of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer’s disease, 10(1), 9–18.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnston, B. C., Ebrahim, S., Carrasco-Labra, A., Furukawa, T. A., Patrick, D. L., Crawford, M. W., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Schunemann, H. J., Guyatt, G. H., & Nesrallah, G. (2015). Minimally important difference estimates and methods: A protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 5(10), e007953.

Google Scholar 

Cook, C. E. (2008). Clinimetrics corner: The minimal clinically important change score (MCID): A necessary pretense. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 16(4), 82E-83E.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Vet, H. C., Foumani, M., Scholten, M. A., Jacobs, W. C., Stiggelbout, A. M., Knol, D. L., & Peul, W. C. (2015). Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(5), 518–524.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutherland, J. M., Albanese, C. M., Wing, K., Zhang, Y. J., Younger, A., Veljkovic, A., & Penner, M. (2021). Effect of patient demographics on minimally important difference of Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale among end-stage ankle arthritis patients. Foot & Ankle International, 42(5), 624–632.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang, Y.-C., Hart, D. L., Stratford, P. W., & Mioduski, J. E. (2011). Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 675–688.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chiarotto, A., Vanti, C., Cedraschi, C., Ferrari, S., Ostelo, R. W., & Pillastrini, P. (2016). Responsiveness and minimal important change of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire and short forms in patients with chronic low back pain. The Journal of Pain, 17(6), 707–718.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuller, W., Ostelo, R. W., Janssen, R., & de Vet, H. C. (2014). The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Terluin, B., Roos, E. M., Terwee, C. B., Thorlund, J. B., & Ingelsrud, L. H. (2021). Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): Don’t stratify on the baseline score! Quality of Life Research, 30(10), 2773–2782.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alma, H., de Jong, C., Jelusic, D., Wittmann, M., Schuler, M., Kollen, B., Sanderman, R., Kocks, J., Schultz, K., & van der Molen, T. (2019). Baseline health status and setting impacted minimal clinically important differences in COPD: An exploratory study. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 116, 49–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bahadır, S., Yuksel, S., Ayhan, S., Nabi, V., Vila-Casademunt, A., Obeid, I., Perez-Grueso, F. J. S., Acaroglu, E., Group, E. S. S. (2021). Variation of minimum clinically important difference by age, gender, baseline disability, and change of direction in adult spinal deformity population: Is it a constant value? World Neurosurgery, 146, e1171–e1176.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baker, J. F., Katz, P., & Michaud, K. (2021). Defining minimum clinically important changes for the patient activity scale II. Arthritis Care & Research, 73(10), 1456–1460.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bauer-Staeb, C., Kounali, D.-Z., Welton, N. J., Griffith, E., Wiles, N. J., Lewis, G., Faraway, J. J., & Button, K. S. (2021). Effective dose 50 method as the minimal clinically important difference: Evidence from depression trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 137, 200–208.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Beemster, T., Van Bennekom, C., van Velzen, J., Reneman, M., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2018). The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16, 1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blanker, M. H., Alma, H. J., Devji, T. S., Roelofs, M., Steffens, M. G., & van der Worp, H. (2019). Determining the minimal important differences in the international prostate symptom score and overactive bladder questionnaire: Results from an observational cohort study in Dutch primary care. British Medical Journal Open, 9(12), e032795.

Google Scholar 

Boyer, C. W., Lee, I. E., & Tenan, M. S. (2022). All MCIDs are wrong, but some may be useful. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 52(6), 401–407.

Article  Google Scholar 

Carton, P., & Filan, D. (2020). Defining the minimal clinically important difference in athletes undergoing arthroscopic correction of sports-related femoroacetabular impingement: The percentage of possible improvement. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 8(1), 2325967119894747.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Kleermaeker, F. G., Boogaarts, H. D., Meulstee, J., & Verhagen, W. I. (2019). Minimal clinically important difference for the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire: New insights and review of literature. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 44(3), 283–289.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karmacharya, P., Stull, C., Stephens-Shields, A., Husni, M. E., Scher, J. U., Craig, E., Fitzsimmons, R., Reddy, S. M., Magrey, M. N., & Ogdie, A. (2023). Responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference in patient-reported outcome measures among patients with psoriatic arthritis: A prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care & Research, 75(10), 2182–2189.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kitchen, H., Seitz, C., Trigg, A., Aldhouse, N., Willgoss, T., Schmitz, H., Gater, A., Gerlinger, C., & Haberland, C. (2021). Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on item importance, scoring, and clinically meaningful differences for the endometriosis symptom diary (ESD) and endometriosis impact scale (EIS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19, 1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kounali, D., Button, K. S., Lewis, G., Gilbody, S., Kessler, D., Araya, R., Duffy, L., Lanham, P., Peters, T. J., & Wiles, N. (2022). How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1875–1882.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lapin, B., Thompson, N. R., Schuster, A., & Katzan, I. L. (2019). Clinical utility of patient-reported outcome measurement information system domain scales: Thresholds for determining important change after stroke. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(1), e004753.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malavolta, E. A., Yamamoto, G. J., Bussius, D. T., Assunção, J. H., Andrade-Silva, F. B., Gracitelli, M. E., & Neto, A. A. F. (2022). Establishing minimal clinically important difference for the UCLA and ASES scores after rotator cuff repair. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 108(2), 102894.

Google Scholar 

McClure, N. S., Al Sayah, F., Ohinmaa, A., & Johnson, J. A. (2018). Minimally important difference of the EQ-5D-5L index score in adults with type 2 diabetes. Value in Health, 21(9), 1090–1097.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riepe, C., Osada, N., Reich, A., Augustin, M., Zeidler, C., & Ständer, S. (2019). Minimal clinically important difference in chronic pruritus appears to be dependent on baseline itch severity. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 99(13), 1288–1290.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silverberg, J. I., Lei, D., Yousaf, M., Janmohamed, S., Vakharia, P., Chopra, R., Chavda, R., Gabriel, S., Patel, K., & Singam, V. (2021). What are the best endpoints for eczema area and severity index and scoring atopic dermatitis in clinical practice? A prospective observational study. British Journal of Dermatology, 184(5), 888–895.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stienstra, M., Edelaar, M., Fritz, B., & Reneman, M. (2022). Measurement properties of the work ability score in sick-listed workers with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(1), 103–113.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutherland, J. M., Albanese, C. M., Crump, T., Liu, G., & Karimuddin, A. (2021). The minimally important difference of the gastrointestinal quality of life index for symptomatic gallstone surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 35, 1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhou, L., Natarajan, M., Miller, B. S., & Gagnier, J. J. (2018). Establishing minimal important differences for the VR-12 and SANE scores in patients following treatment of rotator cuff tears. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6(7), 2325967118782159.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McVary, K., Rogers, T., Cantrill, C., & Roehrborn, C. (2019). MP01-02 what minimal important difference in urinary symptom relief benefits patient quality of life?–Associated with Rezūm water vapor thermal therapy 4 year outcomes. Journal of Urology, 201, e1.