Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14(2), 83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cuouper, M., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F., & Singer, E. (2006). Evaluation the effectiveness of visual analogue scales. A web experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 2227–2245.

Google Scholar 

Brazier, J., Deverill, M., Green, C., Harper, R., & Booth, A. (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta3090

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng, Y., Parkin, D., & Devlin, N. J. (2014). Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Quality of Life Research, 23(3), 977–989.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hayes, M. H. S., & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98–99.

Google Scholar 

Torrance, G. W. (1976). Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 10(3), 129–136.

Article  Google Scholar 

Patrick, D. L., Bush, J. W., & Chen, M. M. (1973). Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Services Research, 8, 228.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spronk, I., Haagsma, J., Lubetkin, E., Polinder, S., Janssen, M., & Bonsel, G. (2021). Health inequality analysis in Europe: Exploring the potential of the EQ-5D as outcome. Frontiers in Public Health, 4(9), 744405.

Article  Google Scholar 

Teni, F., Burström, K., & Devlin, N. (2023). Experience-based health state valuation using the EQ VAS: A register-based study of the EQ-5D-3L among nine patient groups in Sweden. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02115-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2006). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 79.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rencz, F., & Janssen, M. (2024). Testing the psychometric properties of 9 bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L in a general population sample. Value Health, 27(7), 943–954.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan, R. L., Yang, Z., Igarashi, A., Herdman, M., & Luo, N. (2021). How do respondents interpret and view the EQ-VAS? A qualitative study of three Asian populations. Patient, 14(2), 283–293.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ernstsson, O., Burstrom, K., Heintz, E., & Molsted Alvesson, H. (2020). Reporting and valuing one’s own health: A think aloud study using EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS and a time trade-off question among patients with a chronic condition. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 388.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheng, L. J., Tan, R. L., & Luo, N. (2021). Measurement properties of the EQ VAS around the globe: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Value Health, 24(8), 1223–1233.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nord, E. (2000) EuroQolus.

Whynes, D. K. (2008). Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 94.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Robinson, A., Dolan, P., & Williams, A. (1997). Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers? Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1289.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Karimi, M., Brazier, J., & Paisley, S. (2017). How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 80.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Devlin, N. J., Hansen, P., & Selai, C. (2004). Understanding health state valuations: A qualitative analysis of respondents’ comments. Quality of Life Research, 13, 1265.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Papaioannou, D., Brazier, J., & Parry, G. (2011). How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review. Value Health, 14(6), 907–920.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang, X., Guo, G., Zhou, L., Zheng, J., Liang, X., Li, Z., Luo, H., Yang, Y., Yang, L., Tan, T., Yu, J., & Lu, L. (2017). Health-related quality of life in pregnant women living with HIV: A comparison of EQ-5D and SF-12. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 158.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tran, B. X., Ohinmaa, A., & Nguyen, L. T. (2012). Quality of life profile and psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in HIV/AIDS patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 132.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Luo, N., Cang, S. Q., Quah, H. M., How, C. H., & Tay, E. G. (2012). The discriminative power of the EuroQol visual analog scale is sensitive to survey language in Singapore. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 32.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Qian, X., Tan, R. L. Y., Chuang, L. H., & Luo, N. (2020). Measurement properties of commonly used generic preference-based measures in East and South-East Asia: A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics, 38, 159.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2001). Visual analog scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Medical Decision Making, 21(4), 329–334.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Boer, A. G., van Lanschot, J. J., Stalmeier, P. F., van Sandick, J. W., Hulscher, J. B., de Haes, J. C., & Sprangers, M. A. (2004). Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 311–320.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13(4), 227–236.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

McCormack, H. M., Horne, D. J., & Sheather, S. (1988). Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: A critical review. Psychological Medicine, 18(4), 1007–1019.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aitken, R. C. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62(10), 989–993.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zrubka, Z., Hermann, Z., Gulácsi, L., Brodszky, V., Rencz, F., & Péntek, M. (2019). Determinants of the acceptability of health problems in different ages: Exploring a new application of the EQ VAS. The European Journal of Health Economics, 20(Suppl 1), 31–41.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Whynes, D. K. (2013). Does the correspondence between EQ-5D health state description and VAS score vary by medical condition? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 155.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Dongen, J. M., van Hooff, M. L., Finch, A. P., van Tulder, M. W., Bosmans, J. E., Ostelo, R., & de Kleuver, M. (2019). Do socio-demographic characteristics and/or health status explain the magnitude of differences between patient and general public utility values? A chronic low back pain patients case study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 166.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Teni, F. S., Rolfson, O., Devlin, N., Parkin, D., Nauclér, E., & Burström, K. (2021). Variations in patients’ overall assessment of their health across and within disease groups using the EQ-5D questionnaire: Protocol for a longitudinal study in the Swedish national quality registers. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(8), e27669.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pyo, J., Ock, M., Park, B., Kim, N. E., Choi, E. J., Park, H., & Ahn, H. S. (2021). Meaning and status of health-related quality of life recognized by medical professionals: A qualitative study. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(3), e20.