Japanese Breast Cancer Society Report [Internet]. https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d2dca-3136e0dd-454455534531-4ab5843a6bc1ec71&q=1&e=eb4f04aa-7dde-4cb3-855e-e73372eab2c9&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmemberpage.jbcs.gr.jp%2FC52%2Fmenu_details%2F28. Accessed 10/06/2024.
National Cancer Center Cancer Control Information Center. Cancer statistics in Japan; table download. cancer information service. Available http://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/dl/index.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2020.
Sasada S, Kumamaru H, Hayashi N, Kinukawa N, Toi M, Jinno H, et al. Impact of immediate breast reconstruction on perioperative therapy: insights from a Japanese Nationwide Registry. Breast Cancer. 2024;31:909–16.
: Nomura H, Abe A, Fusegi A, Yoshimitsu T, Misaka S, Murakami A, et al. Impact of the coverage of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by the national insurance system for women with BRCA pathogenic variants in Japan. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1018.
: Nagura N, Hayashi N, Takei J, Yoshida A, Ochi T, Iwahira Y, et al. Breast reconstruction after risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers. Breast Cancer. 2020;27:70–76.
: Morgan R, Brown A, Hamman KJ, Sampson J, Naik A, Massimino K. Risk management decisions in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Am J Surg. 2018;215:899–903.
: Manrique OJ, Charafeddine A, Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Jacobson SR, MartinezJorge J, et al. Two-staged implant-based breast reconstruction: a long-term outcome study in a young population. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55:481.
: Chen H, Zhang P, Zhang M, Wang M, Bai F, Wu K. Growing trends of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction in young breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2019;239:224–232.
: Fanakidou I, Zyga S, Alikari V, Tsironi M, Stathoulis J, Theofilou P. Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:539–543.
: Li XR, Zhang YJ, Wang JD, Cheng LQ, Liu L, Li J, et al. Application of immediate breast reconstruction with silicon prosthetic implantation following bilateral mammary gland excision in treatment of young patients with early breast cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:278–82.
: Yamakado R, Ishitobi M, Kondo N, Yamauchi C, Sasada S, Nogi H, et al. Collaborative study group of scientific research of the Japanese breast cancer society. physicians’ perception about the impact of breast reconstruction on patient prognosis: a survey in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2023;30:302–308.
: Heikkinen J, Bonde C, Oranges CM, Toia F, di Summa PG, Giordano S. Efficacy of breast reconstruction in elderly women (> 60 years) using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: A comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;84:266–272.
: Sada A, Day CN, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ. Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in the elderly: Trends and outcomes. Surgery. 2019;166:709–714.
Momeni A, Kanchwala S, Sbitany H. Oncoplastic procedures in preparation for nipple-sparing mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction: controlling the breast envelope. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:914–20.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Momeni A, Heier M, Torio-Padron N, Penna V, Bannasch H, Stark BG. Correlation between complication rate and patient satisfaction in abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:5–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:281–92.
AMOC. Usermanual-decision regret scale. Accessed August 2, 2021 at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_manuals/UM_Regret_Scale.pdf
Sheehan J, Sherman KA, Lam T, Boyages J. Association of information satisfaction, psychological distress and monitoring coping style with post-decision regret following breast reconstruction. Psychooncology. 2007;16:342–51.
Goel V, Sawka CA, Thiel EC, Gort EH, O’Connor AM. Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:1–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sheehan J, Sherman K, Lam T, Boyages J. Regret associated with the decision for breast reconstruction: the association of negative body image, distress and surgery characteristics with decision regret. Psychol Health. 2008;23:207–19.
Oprea N, Ardito V, Ciani O. Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23:164.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sowa Y, Inafuku N, Tsuge I, Yamanaka H, Katsube M, Sakamoto M, et al. Development and implementation of a decision aid for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction for Japanese women with breast cancer: a field-testing study. Breast Cancer. 2023;30:570–6.
Politi MC, Lee CN, Philpott-Streiff SE, Foraker RE, Olsen MA, Merrill C, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the BREASTChoice tool for personalized decision support about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 2020;271:230–7.
Oh DD, Flitcroft K, Brennan ME, et al. Patterns and outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:604–15.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gibreel WO, Day CN, Hoskin TL, et al. Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for cancer in the elderly a National Cancer Data Base study. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:895–905.
In H, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, et al. Variation in the utilization of reconstruction following mastectomy in elderly women. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1872–9.
Butz DR, Lapin B, Yao K, et al. Advanced age is a predictor of 30-day complications after autologous but not implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:253 e-61.
Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, Trivella M, Pereira J, Caddy CM, et al. Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(8):750–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Mioton LM, Fine NA, Bilimoria KY, Kim JY. A predictive model of risk and outcomes in tissue expander reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 9786 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:513–8.
Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Effect of patient age on outcomes in breast reconstruction: results from a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:745–54.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, Richrath P, Behrendt P, Andree C. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1086–92.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF. Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:375–81.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Ingargiola MJ, et al. Flap failure and wound complications in autologous breast reconstruction a national perspective. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:902–9.
Klasson S, Nyman J, Svensson H, Velander P. Smoking increases donor site complications in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50:331–5.
Danko D, Ash ME, Brown OH, Losken A, Thompson PW. Implant-based breast reconstruction in the elderly: complications and patient-reported outcomes in women older than 70 years. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91:55–61.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim M, Ali B, Zhang K, Vingan P, Boe L, Ly CL, et al. Age Impacts clinical and patient reported outcomes following post mastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; Epub ahead of print.
Tanno K, Bito S, Isobe Y, Takagi Y. Validation of a Japanese version of the decision regret scale. J Nurs Meas. 2016;24:E44-54.
Haworth JE, Moniz D, Lane IF. Patient satisfaction and the role of preoperative information in elective surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1004–11.
Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1229–37.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Smith SG, Pandit A, Rush SR, Wolf MS, Simon CJ. The role of patient activation in preferences for shared decision making: results from a national survey of U.S. adults. J Health Commun. 2016;21:67–75.
Comments (0)