Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Kairaluoma M, Carpelan-Holmström M, Kössi J, Rautio A et al (2018) Does ventral rectopexy improve pelvic floor function in the long term? Dis Colon Rectum 61(2):230–238
Franceschilli L, Varvaras D, Capuano I, Ciangola CI, Giorgi F, Boehm G et al (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases. Tech Coloproctol 19(4):209–219
Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Hayashi K, Yagi Y, Kusanagi H (2018) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectoanal intussusception: prospective evaluation of clinical, physiological and morphological changes. Tech Coloproctol 22(6):425–431
Fabiani B, Sturiale A, Fralleone L, Menconi C, d’Adamo V, Naldini G (2023) Modified robotic ventral rectopexy with folded single titanized mesh suspension for the treatment of complex pelvic organ prolapse. Colorectal Dis: The Official Journal Of The Association Of Coloproctology Of Great Britain And Ireland 25(3):453–457
Solari S, Martellucci J, Ascanelli S, Sturiale A, Annicchiarico A, Fabiani B et al (2022) Predictive factors for functional failure of ventral mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 26(12):973–979
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He J, Yao H-B, Wang C-J, Yang Q-Y, Qiu J-M, Chen J-M et al (2020) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors. World journal of surgical oncology 18(1):215
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yehya A, Gamaan I, Abdelrazek M, Shahin M, Seddek A, Abdelhafez M (2020) Laparoscopic suture versus mesh rectopexy for the treatment of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children: a comparative randomized study. Minim Invasive Surg 2020:3057528
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Perrenot C, Germain A, Scherrer M-L, Ayav A, Brunaud L, Bresler L (2013) Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 56(7):909–914
Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 12(2):97–104
Rautio T (2016) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate. Tech Coloproctol 20(10):715–720
Cervigni M, Fuschi A, Morciano A, Campanella L, Carbone A, Schiavi MC (2024) Obstructed defecation syndrome: analysis of the efficacy and mid-term quality of life of an innovative robotic approach. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 12(19):1978
Naldini G, Fabiani B, Sturiale A, Russo E, Simoncini T (2021) Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse. Updat Surg 73(3):1115–1124
Inaba CS, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Koh CY, Jafari MD, Mills SD, Carmichael JC et al (2017) Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience. Tech Coloproctol 21(8):667–671
Postillon A, Perrenot C, Germain A, Scherrer M-L, Buisset C, Brunaud L et al (2020) Long-term outcomes of robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 34(2):930–939
Drissi F, Rogier-Mouzelas F, Fernandez Arias S, Podevin J, Meurette G (2023) Moving from laparoscopic synthetic mesh to robotic biological mesh for ventral rectopexy: results from a case series. J Clin Med 12(17):5751
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Feng Q, Ng SSM, Zhang Z, Lin S, Niu Z, Wei Y et al (2021) Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. J Surg Oncol 124(4):607–618
Driouch J, Thaher O, Alnammous G, Dehnst J, Bausch D, Glatz T (2022) Technical feasibility and perioperative outcome of laparoscopic resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) and intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA). Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(5):2041–2049
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJC, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22(21):4977–4987
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shiber M, Zager Y, Horesh N, Anteby R, Nachmani I, Khaikin M (2023) Surgical treatment using robotic approach for Obstructed Defecation syndrome (ODS). Harefuah 162(10):656–659
Driouch J, Thaher O, Brinkmann S, Bausch D, Glatz T (2023) Robotic-assisted rectosigmoid resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE): technical notes, short-term results, and functional outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408(1):177
Wang L, Li C-X, Tian Y, Ye J-W, Li F, Tong W-D (2020) Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: an alternative option for selected patients. World J Clin Cases 8(23):5976–5987
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Nejar A, van den Broeck S, Smets Q, Plaeke P, Spinhoven M, Hubens G et al (2024) Ventral mesh rectopexy. Does a descending perineum impact functional results and quality of life? Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 409(1):44
Devane LA, Ranson SM, Bustamante-Lopez LA, Uwah MS, Kudish B, Kow N et al (2024) Combined robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 67(2):286–290
Baracy MG Jr, Richardson C, Mackeya KR, Hagglund KH, Aslam MF (2021) Does ventral mesh rectopexy at the time of sacrocolpopexy prevent subsequent posterior wall prolapse? J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc 22(3):174–180
Dumas C, Duclos J, Le Huu NR, Fermo M, Gomez E, Henin A et al (2023) Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders better than laparoscopic approach at the beginning of the experience? A retrospective single-center study. Int J Colorectal Dis 38(1):1–8
Bao X, Wang H, Song W, Chen Y, Luo Y (2021) Meta-analysis on current status, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse treatment: can robotic surgery become the gold standard? Int J Colorectal Dis 36:1685
Yasar NF, Waked W, Sturiale A, Fabiani B, Naldini G (2024) Could robotic-assisted surgery reduce mesh-related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 26(4):609–621
Hess GF, Nocera F, Taha-Mehlitz S, Christen S, von Strauss Und Torney M, Steinemann DC (2024) Mesh-associated complications in minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 38(12):7073–7082
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rogier-Mouzelas F, Drissi F, Podevin J, Duchalais E, Meurette G (2023) Anatomic and functional results of ventral biological mesh rectopexy for posterior pelvic floor disorders. J Visc Surg 160(3):188–195
Chaoui AM, Chaoui I, Olivier F, Geers J, Abasbassi M (2024) Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Belg 124(2):91–98
Marra AA, Campennì P, de Simone V, Parello A, Litta F, Ratto C (2023) Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience. Tech Coloproctol 27:1–7
Yao H, Li T, Chen W, Lei S, Liu K, Jin X et al (2020) Safety and feasibility of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms during the initial learning curve. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01355
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, Waters PS, Warrier SK, Heriot A (2021) The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 23(11):2806–2820
Comments (0)