O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, Pollard AJ (2001) The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87(4):287–289

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

González ST, Rosito TE, Tur AB, Ruiz J, Gozalbez R, Maiolo A, Tavares PM, Gorgen ARH, Kencht ELd, Madarriaga YQ et al (2022) Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Int Braz J Urol 48(6):961–968

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Esposito C, Cerulo M, Lepore B, Coppola V, D’Auria D, Esposito G, Carulli R, Del Conte F, Escolino M (2023) Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg 17(4):1239–1246

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rané A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology 72(2):260–263

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R (2019) Robotic urologic surgical interventions performed with the single port dedicated platform: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 75(4):684–691

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Satava RM (2009) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(4–5):257–261

Google Scholar 

Kantor J (2017) Reliability and photographic equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale, an outcome measure for postoperative scars. JAMA Dermatol 153(1):55

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bell SW, Kong JCH, Clark DA, Carne P, Skinner S, Pillinger S, Burton P, Brown W (2022) The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index: NASA-TLX: evaluation of its use in surgery. ANZ J Surg 92(11):3022–3028

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Polat H, Tasci AI (2011) Early Experience with Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty in Children. J Pediatr Urol 7(2):187–191

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naitoh Y, Kawauchi A, Yamada Y, Fujihara A, Hongo F, Kamoi K, Okihara K, Miki T (2014) Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a matched pair analysis. Int J Urol 21(8):793–796

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamada Y, Naitoh Y, Kobayashi K, Fujihara A, Johnin K, Hongo F, Naya Y, Kamoi K, Okihara K, Kawauchi A et al (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for pediatric urologic disease. J Endourol 30(1):24–27

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bi Y, Lu L, Ruan S (2011) Using conventional 3- and 5-mm straight instruments in laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21(10):969–972

Article  Google Scholar 

Clements T, Raman JD (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Ther Adv Urol 3(3):141–149

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ren C, Sun D (2022) Robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic bilateral ovarian cystectomy using the Shurui® system: a case report. Intelligent Surgery 3:9–13

Article  Google Scholar 

Peng D, Jing T, Yao X, Ye S, Xu X, He A, Liang Z, Lai C, Qi H, Meng H et al (2023) Preliminary experience of partial nephrectomy through a new single-port surgical robot system. J Endourol 37(5):535–541

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jing T, Peng D, Yao X, Ye S, Zhao Q, Ni M, Shao J, Xu X, He A, Liang Z et al (2023) Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the novel Shurui single-port robotic surgical system. J Endourol 37(10):1105–1112

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo Z, Shi Y, Song Z, Jia W, Wang S, Zhang Y, Ji X, Liu K, Zhang T, Cheng X, Zhao R. Single-incision robotic assisted surgery: a nonrandomized cohort pilot study on a novel surgical platform in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg. 2023;109(11):3417–29.

Li C, Zhu XY, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Zhao J (2024) Single-port robot-assisted thoracoscopic right lower bronchial sleeve lobectomy utilizing the Shurui single-port robotic system. J Thorac Dis 16(11):7920–7925

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu Z, Wang Z, Moschovas MC, Bertolo R, Campi R, Rivas JG, Wei Y, Xia D, Xu B, Zhu Q et al (2024) Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy with the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP platforms: comparison of the technology, intraoperative performance, and outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 67:26–37

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SH, Kim SW, Han SW, Lee YS (2021) Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children. Investig Clin Urol 62(5):592

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Granberg C, Parikh N, Gargollo P (2023) And then there was one…incision. First single-port pediatric robotic case series. J Pediatric Urol 19(4):4261–4264

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith JM, Hernandez AD, DeMarco RT, Bayne CE (2023) Early experience with pediatric single-port robotic pyeloplasty compared to multiport robotic cohorts. J Urol 210(2):236–238

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaouk JH, Haber G-P, Autorino R, Crouzet S, Ouzzane A, Flamand V, Villers A (2014) A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 66(6):1033–1043

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai A, Chen GL, di Meo NA, Crivellaro S (2022) Single-port robotic surgery: general principles and troubleshooting. J Endourol 36(S2):S-25-S−28

Article  Google Scholar 

Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M et al (2016) Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatr Urol 12(4):229.e1–29.e7

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Turrà F, Escolino M, Farina A, Settimi A, Esposito C, Varlet F (2017) Pyeloplasty techniques using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients. Translational Pediatrics 5(4):251–255

Article  Google Scholar 

Sun M, Yu C, Zhao J, Liu M, Liu Y, Han R, Chen L, Wu S. The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):265.

Wang M, Xi Y, Huang N, Wang P, Zhang L, Zhao M, Pu S (2023) Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 11:e16468

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP, Chang SL (2018) Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol 14(4):336.e1–36.e8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morgantini LA, Del Pino M, Bharadwaj A, Alzein A, Ganesh A, Egan E, Del Giudice F, Crivellaro S (2022) Single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted procedures from the patient’s perspective: a retrospective cohort study. Urology Practice 9(6):575–579

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar