Bissell MM, Raimondi F, Ait Ali L, Allen BD, Barker AJ, Bolger A, et al. 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023;25(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gorecka M, Bissell MM, Higgins DM, Garg P, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00882-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dyverfeldt P, Bissell M, Barker AJ, Bolger AF, Carlhäll CJ, Ebbers T, et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sachdeva R, Armstrong AK, Arnaout R, Grosse-Wortmann L, Han BK, Mertens L, et al. Novel techniques in imaging congenital heart disease: JACC Scientific Statement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(1):63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.025.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Demirkiran A, van Ooij P, Westenberg JJM, Hofman MBM, van Assen HC, Schoonmade LJ, et al. Clinical intra-cardiac 4D flow CMR: acquisition, analysis, and clinical applications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(2):154–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab112.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Isorni MA, Moisson L, Moussa NB, Monnot S, Raimondi F, Roussin R, et al. 4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: clinical experience in a high volume center. Int J Cardiol. 2020;320:168–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.021.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Christopher A, Olivieri L, Cross R, Ramakrishnan K, Loke YH. 4-Dimensional Flow by Cardiac magnetic resonance informs Surgical Planning in partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(4):672–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.02.012.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ricci F, Galanti K, Gallina S, Mantini C, Fiore F. Massive haemoptysis in rare congenital left-to-left shunt. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024;8(4):ytae139. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytae139.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Urmeneta Ulloa J, Martínez de Vega V, Hernández Jiménez S, Lobo-González M, Cabrera J. 4D-Flow Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography in Multifenestrated Atrial Septal defect. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(12):e015776. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.123.015776.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao X, Hu L, Leng S, Tan RS, Chai P, Bryant JA, et al. Ventricular flow analysis and its association with exertional capacity in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00832-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Delaney M, Cleveland V, Mass P, Capuano F, Mandell JG, Loke YH, et al. Right ventricular afterload in repaired D-TGA is associated with inefficient flow patterns, rather than stenosis alone. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;38(3):653–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02436-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goubergrits L, Riesenkampff E, Yevtushenko P, Schaller J, Kertzscher U, Hennemuth A, et al. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):909–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24639.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schafstedde M, Yevtushenko P, Nordmeyer S, Kramer P, Schleiger A, Solowjowa N, et al. Virtual treatment planning in three patients with univentricular physiology using computational fluid dynamics-pitfalls and strategies. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:898701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.898701.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hellmeier F, Brüning J, Sündermann S, Jarmatz L, Schafstedde M, Goubergrits L, et al. Hemodynamic modeling of Biological aortic valve replacement using Preoperative Data only. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:593709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.593709.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Qin JJ, Obeidy P, Gok M, Gholipour A, Grieve SM. 4D-flow MRI derived wall shear stress for the risk stratification of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: a systematic review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1075833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1075833.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guala A, Dux-Santoy L, Teixido-Tura G, Ruiz-Muñoz A, Galian-Gay L, Servato ML, et al. Wall Shear stress predicts aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.09.023.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hartman EMJ, De Nisco G, Gijsen FJH, Korteland SA, van der Steen AFW, Daemen J, et al. The definition of low wall shear stress and its effect on plaque progression estimation in human coronary arteries. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01232-3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Azarine A, Garçon P, Stansal A, Canepa N, Angelopoulos G, Silvera S, et al. Four-dimensional Flow MRI: principles and Cardiovascular Applications. Radiographics. 2019;39(3):632–48. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180091.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Candreva A, Buongiorno AL, Matter MA, Rizzini ML, Giacobbe F, Ravetti E, et al. Impact of endothelial shear stress on coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and composition: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2024;407:132061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132061.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fujiwara T, Malone LJ, Chatfield KC, Berthusen A, Fonseca B, Browne LP, et al. Assessment of abnormal transvalvular flow and wall shear stress direction for pediatric/young adults with bicuspid aortic valve: a cross-sectional 4D flow study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101102.

Piatti F, Sturla F, Bissell MM, Pirola S, Lombardi M, Nesteruk I, et al. 4D Flow Analysis of BAV-Related fluid-dynamic alterations: evidences of Wall Shear stress alterations in absence of clinically-relevant aortic anatomical remodeling. Front Physiol. 2017;8:441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00441.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weiss EK, Jarvis K, Maroun A, Malaisrie SC, Mehta CK, McCarthy PM, et al. Systolic reverse flow derived from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in bicuspid aortic valve is associated with aortic dilation and aortic valve stenosis: a cross sectional study in 655 subjects. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023;25(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00906-9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Archer GT, Elhawaz A, Barker N, Fidock B, Rothman A, van der Geest RJ, et al. Validation of four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic stenosis assessment. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66659-6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Riesenkampff E, Fernandes JF, Meier S, Goubergrits L, Kropf S, Schubert S, et al. Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(9):920–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.017.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saitta S, Pirola S, Piatti F, Votta E, Lucherini F, Pluchinotta F, et al. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations. J Biomech. 2019;94:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bruse JL, Khushnood A, McLeod K, Biglino G, Sermesant M, Pennec X, et al. How successful is successful? Aortic arch shape after successful aortic coarctation repair correlates with left ventricular function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(2):418–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.018.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Desai L, Stefek H, Berhane H, Robinson J, Rigsby C, Markl M. Four-dimensional flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Pediatric Coarctation of the Aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;55(1):200–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27802.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mandell JG, Loke YH, Mass PN, Cleveland V, Delaney M, Opfermann J, et al. Altered hemodynamics by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance predict exercise intolerance in repaired coarctation of the aorta: an in vitro study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021;23(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00796-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hirtler D, Romberg J, Stiller B, Geiger J. Longitudinal evaluation of aortic haemodynamics in patients after repair of aortic coarctation: a 4D Flow MRI Follow-Up study. Annals Cardiol Vascular Med. 2022;5(1):1062.