Ojong, S. A., Temmerman, M., Khosla, R. & Bustreo, F. Women’s health and rights in the twenty-first century. Nat. Med. 30, 1547–1555 (2024).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, K. A. & Dipietro Mager, N. A. Women’s involvement in clinical trials: historical perspective and future implications. Pharm. Pract. 14, 708 (2016).
Legato, M. Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine: Gender in the Genomic Era (Academic Press, 2017).
Chapron, C., Marcellin, L., Borghese, B. & Santulli, P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15, 666–682 (2019).
Agarwal, S. K. et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 220, 354.e1–354.e12 (2019).
Al Wattar, B. H. et al. Harmonizing research outcomes for polycystic ovary syndrome (HARP), a marathon not a sprint: current challenges and future research need. Hum. Reprod. 36, 523–528 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dubol, M., Epperson, C. N., Lanzenberger, R., Sundström-Poromaa, I. & Comasco, E. Neuroimaging premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a systematic and critical review. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 57, 100838 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McEvoy, M., McElvaney, R. & Glover, R. Understanding vaginismus: a biopsychosocial perspective. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 39, 680–701 (2021).
Department of Health & Social Care. Our Vision for the Women’s Health Strategy for England assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61c1b579e90e07196a66be15/dhsc-our-vision-for-the-women_s-health-strategy-for-england.pdf (2021).
Stafford-Smith, M. et al. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci. 12, 911–919 (2017).
Serrano, M. G. et al. Racioethnic diversity in the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. Nat. Med. 25, 1001–1011 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oftedal, A. M., Busterud, K., Irgens, L. M., Haug, K. & Rasmussen, S. Socio-economic risk factors for preterm birth in Norway 1999–2009. Scand. J. Public Health 44, 587–592 (2016).
Virtanen, S. et al. Vaginal microbiota composition correlates between pap smear microscopy and next generation sequencing and associates to socioeconomic status. Sci. Rep. 9, 7750 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dabee, S., Passmore, J.-A. S., Heffron, R. & Jaspan, H. B. The complex link between the female genital microbiota, genital infections, and inflammation. Infect. Immun. 89, e00487-20 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haklay, M. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge 105–122 (2012).
Kimura, A. H. & Kinchy, A. Citizen science: probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engag. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2, 331–361 (2016).
Fiske, A., Prainsack, B. & Buyx, A. Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine. J. Med. Ethics 45, 617–622 (2019).
Schwartz-Marín, E., Wade, P., Cruz-Santiago, A. & Cárdenas, R. Colombian forensic genetics as a form of public science: the role of race, nation and common sense in the stabilization of DNA populations. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 862–885 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ottinger, G. Citizen science. In the Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media 6 (Routledge, 2020).
Hager, E. et al. A model for engaging citizen scientists: a community-partnered research collaboration to address inequities for Black birthing people. Matern. Child Health J. 28, 1495–1505 (2024).
Irwin, A. Citizen science comes of ages. Efforts to engage the public in research are bigger and more diverse than ever. But how much more room is there to grow? Nature 562, 480–482 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
A life-course approach to women’s health. Nat. Med. 30, 1 (2024).
Lebeer, S. et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2183–2195 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
David, M. Albert and Gustav Döderlein — a critical view to the biographies of two German professors. Zentralbl. Gynakol. 128, 56–59 (2006).
Wyklicky, H. & Skopec, M. Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, prophet of bacteriology. Infect. Control 4, 367–370 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Khabele, D., Holcomb, K., Connors, N. K. & Bradley, L. A perspective on James Marion Sims, MD, and antiblack racism in obstetrics and gynecology. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 28, 153–155 (2021).
Christmas, M. #SayHerName: should obstetrics and gynecology reckon with the legacy of JM Sims? Reprod. Sci. 28, 3282–3284 (2021).
Spettel, S. & White, M. D. The portrayal of J. Marion Sims’ controversial surgical legacy. J. Urol. 185, 2424–2427 (2011).
Gutiérrez, E. R. Fertile Matters: the Politics of Mexican-Origin Women’s Reproduction (University of Texas Press, 2008).
López, I. Matters of Choice: Puerto Rican Women’s Struggle for Reproductive Freedom (Rutgers University Press, 2008).
Stephenson, H. & Zeldes, K. Write a chapter and change the world: how the Boston Women’s Health Book Collective transformed women’s health then—and now. Am. J. Public Health 98, 1741–1746 (2008).
Boston Women’s Health Collective. Women and Their Bodies (New England Free Press, 1970).
Gijsel, L., Huyse, T. & Van Hoyweghen, I. Citizen Science: Hoe Burgers de Wetenschap Uitdagen (Pelckmans Pro, 2019).
Bonney, R. et al. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59, 977–984 (2009).
Fritz, S. et al. Geo-wiki.org: the use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 1, 345–354 (2009).
Van Brussel, S. & Huyse, H. Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 62, 534–551 (2019).
Kenens, J., Van Oudheusden, M., Yoshizawa, G. & Van Hoyweghen, I. Science by, with and for citizens: rethinking ‘citizen science’ after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Palgrave Commun. 6, 1–8 (2020).
Strasser, B. J., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G. & Tancoigne, E. Rethinking science and public participation. EPFL Sci. Publ. 32, 52–76 (2019).
van Oudheusden, M., Suman, A. B., Huyse, T., Huyse, H. & Medvecky, F. The valuable plurality of the citizen sciences. Sci. Technol. Stud. 13, 10–20 (2024).
Piña-Romero, J. Citizen science ‘from the margins’: epistemologies of ignorance in the Movement of Women with Endometriosis in Mexico. Tapuya Lat. Am. Sci. Technol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2023.2247834 (2023).
del Savio, L., Prainsack, B. & Buyx, A. Crowdsourcing the human gut. Is crowdsourcing also ‘citizen science’? J. Sci. Commun. 15, A03 (2016).
Savio, L. Del, Prainsack, B. & Buyx, A. Motivations of participants in the citizen science of microbiomics: data from the British Gut Project. Genet. Med. 19, 959–961 (2017).
McDonald, D. et al. American Gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 3, e00031-18 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Willis, J. R. et al. Citizen science charts two major ‘stomatotypes’ in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition. Microbiome 6, 218 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lebeer, S. T. et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2183–2195 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stunkel, L. & Grady, C. More than the money: a review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations. Contemp. Clin. Trials 32, 342–352 (2011).
Comments (0)