Sheikh Z, Sima C, Glogauer M. Bone replacement materials and techniques used for achieving vertical alveolar bone augmentation. Materials. 2015;8(6):2953–93.

Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(1):125.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Groot RJ, Oomens MAEM, Forouzanfar T, Schulten EAJM. Bone augmentation followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabilit. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12605.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nguyen TTH, Eo MY, Kuk TS, Myoung H, Kim SM. Rehabilitation of atrophic jaw using iliac onlay bone graft combined with dental implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):1–11.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bianchi A, Felice P, Lizio G, Marchetti C. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus inlay bone grafting in posterior mandibular atrophy: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(3):282–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Ortiz-Vigón A, Molina A, Sanz M. Complications in bone-grafting procedures: classification and management. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):86–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12413.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li J, Wang HL. Common implant-related advanced bone grafting complications: classification, etiology, and management. Implant Dent. 2008;17(4):389–401.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reininger D, Cobo-Vázquez C, Monteserín-Matesanz M, López-Quiles J. Complications in the use of the mandibular body, ramus and symphysis as donor sites in bone graft surgery. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(2):241–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bianchi S, Bernardi S, Simeone D, Torge D, Macchiarelli G, Marchetti E. proliferation and morphological assessment of human periodontal ligament fibroblast towards bovine pericardium membranes: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(23):8284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238284.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, Winter K, Schramm A. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a “gold standard”? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Pannone G, Sbordone L. Volumetric changes after sinus augmentation using blocks of autogenous iliac bone or freeze-dried allogeneic bone. A non-randomized study J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.03.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cortese A, Pantaleo G, Borri A, Caggiano M, Amato M. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in implant dentistry in combination with new bone regenerative technique in elderly patients. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;28:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.09.022.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Girón J, Kerstner E, Medeiros T, Oliveira L, Machado GM, Malfatti CF, Pranke P. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2021e11055.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gutta R, Baker RA, Bartolucci AA, Louis PJ. Barrier membranes used for ridge augmentation: is there an optimal pore size? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elgali O, Omar C, Dahlin P. Thomsen guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125:315–37.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Benic GI, Thoma DS, Jung RE, et al. Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):262–70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):13–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sykes LM, Bradfield C. K Naidu Alveolar bone resorption following tooth extraction characteristically illustrated. S Afr Dent J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.17159/2519-0105/2021/v76no9a5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation part I: lateral approach. J ClinPeriodontol. 2008;35(8):216–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:154–6.

Google Scholar 

Beck-Broichsitter BE, Gerle M, Wiltfang J, Becker ST. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation: a risk factor for long-term success of dental implants? Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(2):151–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schiegnitz E, Hill N, Sagheb K, König J, Sagheb K, Al-Nawas B. Short versus standard length implants with sinus floor elevation for the atrophic posterior maxilla. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022;56(2):143–53. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/2/5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(1):25–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (≤6 mm) dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:68–84. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6893.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Queiroz TP, Aguiar SC, Margonar R, de Souza Faloni AP, Gruber R, Luvizuto ER. Clinical study on survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior mandibular region: resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(9):1036–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;47(3):8–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Badaró MM, Mendoza Marin DO, Pauletto P, Simek Vega Goncalves TM, Porporatti AL, De Luca Canto G. Failures in single extra-short implants(</= 6 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8689.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;43(2):70–6. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.70.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Torassa D, Naldini P, Calvo-Guirado JL, Fernández-Bodereau E. Prospective, clinical pilot study with eleven 4 mm extra-short implants splinted to longer implants for posterior maxilla rehabilitation. J Clin Med. 2020;9:357. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020357.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pardo-Zamora G, Ortiz-Ruíz AJ, Camacho-Alonso F, Martínez-Marco JF, Molina-González JM, Piqué-Clusella N, Vicente-Hernández A. Short dental implants (≤ 8.5 mm) versus standard dental implants (≥10 mm): a one-year post-loading prospective observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5683.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Watanabe H, Saito K, Kokubun K, Sasaki H, Yoshinari M. Change in surface properties of zirconia and initial attachment of osteoblastlike cells with hydrophilic treatment. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:806–14.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feller L, Jadwat Y, Khammissa RA, Meyerov R, Schechter I, Lemmer J. Cellular responses evoked by different surface characteristics of intraosseous titanium implants. Biomed Res Int. 2015.