Quint EH, McCarthy JD, Smith YR. Vaginal surgery for congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:115–24.
Kulkarni A, Dogra N, Zigras T. Innovations in the management of vaginal cancer. Curr Oncol. 2022;29:3082–92.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Laganà AS, Garzon S, Raffaelli R, Ban Frangež H, Lukanovič D, Franchi M. Vaginal stenosis after cervical cancer treatments: challenges for reconstructive surgery. J Invest Surg. 2021;34:754–5.
Horch RE, Hohenberger W, Eweida A, Kneser U, Weber K, Arkudas A, et al. A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:813–23.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bouman MB, van Zeijl MC, Buncamper ME, Meijerink WJ, van Bodegraven AA, Mullender MG. Intestinal vaginoplasty revisited: a review of surgical techniques, complications, and sexual function. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1835–47.
Learner HI, Creighton SM, Wood D. Augmentation vaginoplasty with buccal mucosa for the surgical revision of postreconstructive vaginal stenosis: a case series. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15:e1–7.
Buncamper M, van der Sluis W, Van der Pas R, Özer M, Smit J, Witte B, et al. Surgical outcomes after penile inversion vaginoplasty: a retrospective study of 475 transgender women. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:999–1007.
Kisku S, Varghese L, Kekre A, Sudipta S, Sampath K, Mathai J, et al. Bowel vaginoplasty in children and young women: an institutional experience with 55 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1441–8.
Van der Sluis W, Bouman M, Meijerink W, Elfering L, Mullender M, De Boer N, et al. Diversion neovaginitis after sigmoid vaginoplasty: endoscopic and clinical characteristics. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:834–9.
Hensle TW, Reiley EA. Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol. 1998;159:1035–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oelschlager A, Kirby A, Breech L. Evaluation and management of vaginoplasty complications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:316–21.
Bastu E, Akhan S, Mutlu M, Nehir A, Yumru H, Hocaoglu E, et al. Treatment of vaginal agenesis using a modified McIndoe technique: long-term follow-up of 23 patients and a literature review. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20:241–4.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brownell D, Chabaud S, Bolduc S. Tissue engineering in gynecology. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12319.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sueters J, Xiao F, Roovers JP, Bouman MB, Groenman F, Maas H, et al. Creation of a decellularized vaginal matrix from healthy human vaginal tissue for potential vagina reconstruction: experimental studies. Int J Surg. 2023;109:3905–18.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang X, Qiu J, Ding J, Hua K. Comparison of neovaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft or Interceed in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:1633–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raya-Rivera AM, Esquiliano D, Fierro-Pastrana R, López-Bayghen E, Valencia P, Ordorica-Flores R, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous vaginal organs in patients: a pilot cohort study. Lancet. 2014;384:329–36.
Wefer J, Sekido N, Sievert KD, Schlote N, Nunes L, Dahiya R, et al. Homologous acellular matrix graft for vaginal repair in rats: a pilot study for a new reconstructive approach. World J Urol. 2002;20:260–3.
De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Engineering of vaginal tissue in vivo. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:301–6.
De Filippo RE, Bishop CE, Filho LF, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Tissue engineering a complete vaginal replacement from a small biopsy of autologous tissue. Transplantation. 2008;86:208–14.
Ding JX, Zhang XY, Chen LM, Hua KQ. Vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft in two patients with Meyer-von-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a prospective new technique for vaginal reconstruction. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75:93–6.
Ding JX, Chen LM, Zhang XY, Zhang Y, Hua KQ. Sexual and functional outcomes of vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft or laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:581–9.
Zhang X, Liu Z, Yang Y, Yao Y, Tao Y. The clinical outcomes of vaginoplasty using tissue-engineered biomaterial mesh in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Int J Surg. 2017;44:9–14.
Gomes TG, Agostinho M, Cardoso MC, Costa JND, Matias J. XCM Biologic Tissue Matrix xenograft and autologous micromucosa graft for vaginal reconstruction in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48:185–8.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ho MH, Heydarkhan S, Vernet D, Kovanecz I, Ferrini MG, Bhatia NN, et al. Stimulating vaginal repair in rats through skeletal muscle-derived stem cells seeded on small intestinal submucosal scaffolds. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:300–9.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang N, Qin X, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Li Y, Xie Y, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells accelerate the morphological and functional recovery of neovaginas. Artif Organs. 2018;42:1206–15.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sack BS, Mauney JR, Estrada CR Jr. Silk fibroin scaffolds for urologic tissue engineering. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:16.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chung YG, Tu D, Franck D, Gil ES, Algarrahi K, Adam RM, et al. Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplasty. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91592.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Affas S, Schäfer FM, Algarrahi K, Cristofaro V, Sullivan MP, Yang X, et al. Augmentation cystoplasty of diseased porcine bladders with bi-layer silk fibroin grafts. Tissue Eng Part A. 2019;25:855–66.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galvez C, Gundogdu G, Yang X, Costa K, Mauney JR. Evaluation of acellular bilayer silk fibroin grafts for onlay tracheoplasty in a rat defect model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160:310–9.
Gundogdu G, Okhunov Z, Cristofaro V, Starek S, Veneri F, Orabi H, et al. Evaluation of bi-layer silk fibroin grafts for tubular ureteroplasty in a porcine defect model. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:723559.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gundogdu G, Morhardt D, Cristofaro V, Algarrahi K, Yang X, Costa K, et al. Evaluation of bilayer silk fibroin grafts for tubular esophagoplasty in a porcine defect model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2021;27:103–16.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seth A, Chung YG, Gil ES, Tu D, Franck D, Di Vizio D, et al. The performance of silk scaffolds in a rat model of augmentation cystoplasty. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4758–65.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McCracken JM, Calderon GA, Robinson AJ, Sullivan CN, Cosgriff-Hernandez E, Hakim JCE. Animal models and alternatives in vaginal research: a comparative review. Reprod Sci. 2021;28:1759–73.
Comments (0)