Wang, L., Su, Y. X., & Liao, G. Q. (2009). Quality of life in osteoradionecrosis patients after mandible primary reconstruction with free fibula flap. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 108(2), 162–168.
Zhang, J., Gu, Z., Jiang, L., et al. (2010). Ameloblastoma in children and adolescents. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(7), 549–554.
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424.
McCrary, H. C., Seim, N. B., & Old, M. O. (2023). History, innovation, pearls, and pitfalls in complex midface reconstruction. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 56(4), 703–713.
Pellini, R., Mercante, G., & Spriano, G. (2012). Step-by-step mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap modelling. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 32(6), 405–409.
CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Iyer, S., & Thankappan, K. (2014). Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 47(1), 8–19.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sharma, A. J., Nagrath, R., & Lahori, M. (2017). A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: An in vivo study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 17(4), 361–372.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pappalardo, M., Tsao, C. K., Tsang, M. L., et al. (2018). Long-term outcome of patients with or without osseointegrated implants after resection of mandibular ameloblastoma and reconstruction with vascularized bone graft: Functional assessment and quality of life. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 71(7), 1076–1085.
Kumar, V. V., Jacob, P. C., Ebenezer, S., et al. (2016). Implant supported dental rehabilitation following segmental mandibular reconstruction- quality of life outcomes of a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(7), 800–810.
Brandão, T. B., Vechiato, F. A. J., Prado, R. A. C., et al. (2016). Evaluation of use of acrylic resin-based surgical guide in the function and quality of life provided by mandibular prostheses with microvascular free fibula flap: A four-year, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(3), 457–463.
Gabr, E. M., Kobayashi, M. R., Salibian, A. H., et al. (2004). Oromandibular reconstruction with vascularized free flaps: A review of 50 cases. Microsurgery, 24(5), 374–377.
Attia, S., Wiltfang, J., Streckbein, P., et al. (2019). Functional and aesthetic treatment outcomes after immediate jaw reconstruction using a fibula flap and dental implants. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 47(5), 786–791.
Okay, D. J., Buchbinder, D., Urken, M., et al. (2013). Computer-assisted implant rehabilitation of maxillomandibular defects reconstructed with vascularized bone free flaps. JAMA Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 139(4), 371–381.
Lodders, J. N., Van, B. G. J. C., Vergeer, M. R., et al. (2022). Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap: the effect on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer, 30(6), 5411–5420.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Said, M. M., Otomaru, T., Sumita, Y., et al. (2017). Systematic review of literature: functional outcomes of implant-prosthetic treatment in patients with surgical resection for oral cavity tumors. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 8(2), 1–9.
Wijbenga, J. G., Schepers, R. H., Werker, P. M., Witjes, M. J., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2016). A systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life following reconstruction of maxillofacial defects using vascularized free fibula flaps and dental rehabilitation reveals poor data quality. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 69(8), 1024–1036.
Quadri, M. F. A., Alamir, A. W. H., John, T., et al. (2020). Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Translational Cancer Research, 9(4), 3107–3118.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Singh, J., Sloan, J. A., & Johanson, N. A. (2010). Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: Problems and solutions. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 18(2), 72–82.
Pequeno, N. P. F., Cabral, N. L. A., Marchioni, D. M., Lima, S., & Lyra, C. O. (2020). Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: A systematic review of population-based studies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 208–217.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petrovic, I., Panchal, H., De, S., Franca, P. D., et al. (2019). A systematic review of validated tools assessing functional and aesthetic outcomes following fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible. Head and Neck, 41(1), 248–255.
Mehta, T., Venkata, S. A., Chetter, I., & McCollum, P. (2003). Disease-specific quality of life assessment in intermittent claudication: review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 25(3), 202–208.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brennan, D. S. (2013). Oral health impact profile, EuroQol, and assessment of quality of life instruments as quality of life and health-utility measures of oral health. European Journal Oral Sciences, 121(3), 188–193.
De, V. M., Ouwendijk, R., Kessels, A. G., et al. (2005). Comparison of generic and disease-specific questionnaires for the assessment of quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 41(2), 261–268.
Locker, D., & Allen, F. (2007). What do measures of ‘oral health-related quality of life’ measure? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(6), 401–411.
Gaxiola-García, M. A., Kushida-Contreras, B. H., Albornoz, C. R., & Manrique, O. J. (2024). Quality of life assessment after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review of available tools. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62(1), 23–29.
Pusic, A., Liu, J. C., Chen, C. M., et al. (2007). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 136(4), 525–535.
Terrell, J. E., Nanavati, K. A., Esclamado, R. M., et al. (1997). Head and neck cancer-specific quality of life: Instrument validation. Archives of otolaryngology head & neck surgery, 123(10), 1125–1132.
Funk, G. F., Karnell, L. H., Christensen, A. J., Moran, P. J., & Ricks, J. (2003). Comprehensive head and neck oncology health status assessment. Head Neck, 25(7), 561–575.
Boyes, H., Barraclough, J., Ratansi, R., Rogers, S. N., & Kanatas, A. (2018). Structured review of the patient-reported outcome instruments used in clinical trials in head and neck surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 56(3), 161–167.
Kanatas, A. N., & Rogers, S. N. (2010). A systematic review of patient self-completed questionnaires suitable for oral and maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(8), 579–590.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, 2700.
World Health Organization. ICD-DA. (1995) Application of the International Classification of Diseases to Dentistry and Stomatology. England.
Flemyng, E., Moore, T. H., Boutron, I., et al. (2023). Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane. BMJ Evidence Based Medicine, 28(4), 260–266.
Sterne, J. A. C., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., et al. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, 4898.
Higgins, J. P. T., Morgan, R. L., Rooney, A. A., et al. (2024). A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E). Environment International, 24, 186.
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170.
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mokkink, L. B., de, Vet, H.C.W., Prinsen, C.A.C., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179.
Mokkink, L.B., Patrick, D.L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L.M., de, Vet, H.C.W., Terwee, C.B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018-1.pdf
Terwee, C.B., Chiarotto, A., De, Vet, H.C.W., Bouter, L.M., Alonso, J., Westerman, M.J., Patrick, D.L., Mokkink, L.B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs. VU University Medical Center, Retrieved Januart 20, 2024, from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf.
Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157.
Comments (0)