Tarneja P, Duggal BS. Hysteroscopy: past, present and future. Med J Armed Forces India. 2002;58(4):293–4.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(3):115–22.
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The use of hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):e138-48. An important overview of best practices for office hysteroscopy, reaffirmed 2023.
Shields J, Dilday E, Chang S, Kho K. Moving hysteroscopy from the office to the operating room: a comparison of clinical outcomes and resource utilization. High Value Practice Academic Alliance National Conference 2018. https://hvpaa.org/moving-hysteroscopy-from-the-office-to-the-operating-room-a-comparison-of-clinical-outcomes-and-resource-utilization/. Accessed 5 Jul 2021.
Moawad NS, Santamaria E, Johnson M, Shuster J. Cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding. JSLS. 2014;18(3):e2014.00393. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.003935.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kasius JC, Eijkemans RJ, Mol BW, Fauser BC, Fatemi HM, Broekmans FJ. Cost-effectiveness of hysteroscopy screening for infertile women. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(6):619–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.015.
Ghaly S, de Abreu LR, Abbott JA. Audit of endometrial biopsy at outpatient hysteroscopy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(2):202–6.
Marsh FA, Rogerson LJ, Duffy SR. A randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy. BJOG. 2006;113(8):896–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00967.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women: Practice Bulletin No. 128. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:197–206.
Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:553–5.
Bingol B, Gunenc Z, Gedikbasi A, Guner H, Tasdemir S, Tiras B. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(1):54–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.532246. PMID: 21280995.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, Jacobi CE, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007;114:664–75.
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide, Munro MG, Storz K, et al. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media: (replaces hysteroscopic fluid monitoring guidelines. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:167–168.). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):137–48.
Mouhayar Y, Yin O, Mumford SL, Segars JH. Hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to infertility treatment: a cost analysis and systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;213:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 13. PMID: 28445799; PMCID: PMC5505524.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Noventa M, Spagnol G, Marchetti M, Saccardi C, Bonaldo G, Laganà AS, Cavallin F, Andrisani A, Ambrosini G, Vitale SG, Pacheco LA, Haimovich S, Di Spiezio SA, Carugno J, Scioscia M, Garzon S, Bettocchi S, Buzzaccarini G, Tozzi R, Vitagliano A. Uterine septum with or without hysteroscopic metroplasty: impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. J Clin Med. 2022;11(12):3290. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123290.PMID:35743362;PMCID:PMC9224595.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Spanish Infertility SWOT Group (SISG), Checa MA, Bellver J, Bosch E, Espinós JJ, Fabregues F, Fontes J, García-Velasco J, Requena A. Hysteroscopic septum resection and reproductive medicine: a SWOT analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(6):709–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 22. PMID: 30527061.
Meltzer R, Markus AR. An analysis of payment mix patterns of preterm births in a post-affordable care act insurance market: implications for the Medicaid program. WHI. 2020;30(4):248–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Jun 4. PMID: 32505430.
•• van Wessel S, Hamerlynck T, van Vliet H, Schoot B, Weyers S. Manual morcellation (Resectr™ 9Fr) vs electromechanical morcellation (TruClear™) for hysteroscopic polypectomy: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(2):209–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14493. Epub 2023 Jan 20. PMID: 36680382; PMCID: PMC9889322. One of the only studies on new technology for in-office tissue extractors.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Munro MG, Christianson LA. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(4):765–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000146. PMID: 26457853.
Istre O, Skajaa K, Schjoensby AP, Forman A. Changes in serum electrolytes after transcervical resection of endometrium and submucous fibroids with use of glycine 1.5% for uterine irrigation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(2):218–22. PMID: 1635735.
Zayed SM, Elsetohy KA, Zayed M, Fouda UM. Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015;20:154–8.
Telang M, Shetty TS, Puntambekar SS, Telang PM, Panchal S, Alnure Y. Three thousand cases of office hysteroscopy: see and treat an Indian experience. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020;70(5):384–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01334-4. Epub 2020 Jul 17. PMID: 33041557; PMCID: PMC7516003.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sardo ADS, Giampaolino P, Manzi A, De Angelis MC, Zizolfi B, Alonso L, Carugno J. The invisible external cervical os. Tips and tricks to overcome this challenge during in-office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):172–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Jun 9 PMID: 32526381.
•• De Silva PM, Mahmud A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Analgesia for office hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):1034–47. Important systematic review on pain management for office hysteroscopy showing that NSAIDs were best.
•• De Silva PM, Carnegy A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Local anaesthesia for office hysteroscopy: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:70–81. Important systematic review on local anesthetic showing that everything had some effect but nothing was perfect.
Lau WC, Lo WK, Tam WH, Yuen PM. Paracervical anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(4):356–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Giorda G, Scarabelli C, Franceschi S, Campagnutta E. Feasibility and pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(7):593–7.
Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop. 1997;4(2):255–8.
•• Barel O, Preuss E, Stolovitch N, Weinberg S, Barzilay E, Pansky M. Addition of lidocaine to the distension medium in hysteroscopy decreases pain during the procedure-a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(4):865–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 14. PMID: 32798723. A new technique for local anesthetic that avoids additional needle sticks and can be used with vaginoscopy.
Sagiv R, Sadan O, Boaz M, Dishi M, Schechter E, Golan A. A new approach to office hysteroscopy compared with traditional hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):387–92.
Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG. 2010;117(5):532–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cooper N, Smith P, Khan K, Clark T. Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women’s pain experience? A systematic review BJOG. 2011;118:1292–301.
Comments (0)