To investigate overall survival and length of stay (LOS) associated with differing management for high output (>1 L over 24 hours) leaks (HOCL) after cancer-related esophagectomy.
Background:Although infrequent, chyle leak after esophagectomy is an event that can lead to significant perioperative sequelae. Low-volume leaks appear to respond to nonoperative measures, whereas HOCLs often require invasive therapeutic interventions.
Methods:From a prospective single-institution database, we retrospectively reviewed patients treated from 2001 to 2021 who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Within that cohort, we focused on a subgroup of patients who manifested a HOCL postoperatively. Clinicopathologic and operative characteristics were collected, including hospital LOS and survival data.
Results:A total of 53/2299 patients manifested a HOCL. These were mostly males (77%), with a mean age of 62 years. Of this group, 15 patients received nonoperative management, 15 patients received prompt (<72 hours from diagnosis) interventional management, and 23 received late interventional management. Patients in the late intervention group had longer LOSs compared with early intervention (slope = 9.849, 95% CI: 3.431–16.267). Late intervention (hazard ratio: 4.772, CI: 1.384–16.460) and nonoperative management (hazard ratio: 4.731, CI: 1.294–17.305) were associated with increased mortality compared with early intervention. Patients with early intervention for HOCL had an overall survival similar to patients without chyle leaks in survival analysis.
Conclusions:Patients with HOCL should receive early intervention to possibly reverse the prognostic implications of this potentially detrimental complication.
Comments (0)