Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., & Jemal, A. (2023). Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73, 17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2012 – Previous Version – SEER Cancer Statistics Review. In: SEER. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2012/index.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2023.

Ferreira, A. R., Meglio, A. D., Pistilli, B., et al. (2019). Differential impact of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy on quality of life of breast cancer survivors: A prospective patient-reported outcomes analysis. Annals of Oncology, 30, 1784–1795. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz298

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dumas, A., Vaz Luis, I., Bovagnet, T., et al. (2020). Impact of breast cancer treatment on employment: Results of a multicenter prospective cohort study (CANTO). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38, 734–743. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01726

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Firkins, J., Hansen, L., Driessnack, M., & Dieckmann, N. (2020). Quality of life in “chronic” cancer survivors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 14, 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00869-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinto, A. C., & de Azambuja, E. (2011). Improving quality of life after breast cancer: Dealing with symptoms. Maturitas, 70, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.09.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamer, J., McDonald, R., Zhang, L., et al. (2017). Quality of life (QOL) and symptom burden (SB) in patients with breast cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3417-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jim, H. S. L., Hoogland, A. I., Brownstein, N. C., et al. (2020). Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 70, 182–199. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21608

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Atkinson, T. M., Li, Y., Coffey, C. W., et al. (2012). Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0031-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basch, E., Iasonos, A., McDonough, T., et al. (2006). Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Results of a questionnaire-based study. The lancet Oncology, 7, 903–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laugsand, E. A., Sprangers, M. A. G., Bjordal, K., et al. (2010). Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: A multicenter European study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-104

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

EMA. (2018). Regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality life (HRQL) measures in evaluation medicinal products – Scientific guideline. In: Eur. Med. Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/regulatory-guidance-use-health-related-quality-life-hrql-measures-evaluation-medicinal-products. Accessed 28 June 2023.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2006). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-79

Article  Google Scholar 

NICE health technology evaluations: the manual

Cherny, N. I., Sullivan, R., Dafni, U., et al. (2016). ESMO – Magnitude of clinical benefit scale V.1.0 questions and answers. ESMO Open, 1, e000100. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000100

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Papadakos, J. K., Charow, R. C., Papadakos, C. J., et al. (2019). Evaluating cancer patient-reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use. Cancer, 125, 1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31928

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

NIH. (2015). Clear & simple. In: Natl. Inst. Health NIH. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/clear-simple. Accessed 23 Feb 2023.

Weiss, B. D. (2003). Health literacy a manual for clinicians. http://lib.ncfh.org/pdfs/6617.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2022.

Sørensen, K., Pelikan, J. M., Röthlin, F., et al. (2015). Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). European Journal of Public Health, 25, 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

20 % de la population dispose d’un diplôme supérieur à bac + 2 – Centre d’observation de la société. https://www.observationsociete.fr/education/donnees-generales/population-par-diplome/. Accessed 28 July 2023.

Ousseine, Y. M., Bouhnik, A.-D., & Mancini, J. (2022). Health literacy and clinical trial participation in French cancer patients: A national survey. Current Oncology, 29, 3118–3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050253

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Di Meglio, A., Havas, J., Gbenou, A. S., et al. (2022). Dynamics of long-term patient-reported quality of life and health behaviors after adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40, 3190–3204. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00277

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vaz-Luis, I., Cottu, P., Mesleard, C., et al. (2019). UNICANCER: French prospective cohort study of treatment-related chronic toxicity in women with localised breast cancer (CANTO). ESMO Open, 4, e000562. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000562

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lapidari, P., Havas, J., Presti, D., et al. (2022). Abstract P3–12–12: ATTITUDE: Understanding and reducing ATTrition in longiTUDinal studiEs of cancer survivors. Cancer Res, 82, P3-12. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P3-12-12

Article  Google Scholar 

Zebrack, B. J., Ganz, P. A., Bernaards, C. A., et al. (2006). Assessing the impact of cancer: Development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 15, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.963

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Beck, A. T., Guth, D., Steer, R. A., & Ball, R. (1997). Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00025-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1984). Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1365–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6%3c1365::aid-jclp2270400615%3e3.0.co;2-d

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bull, F. C., Maslin, T. S., & Armstrong, T. (2009). Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine country reliability and validity study. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 6, 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.6.6.790

Article  Google Scholar 

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol, 14, 2756–2768. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2756

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Weis, J., Tomaszewski, K. A., Hammerlid, E., et al. (2017). International psychometric validation of an EORTC quality of life module measuring cancer related fatigue (EORTC QLQ-FA12). Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 109, djw273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw273

Article  Google Scholar 

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand., 67, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Élaboration d’un document écrit d’information à l’intention des patients et des usagers du système de santé. In: Haute Aut. Santé. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_430286/fr/elaboration-d-un-document-ecrit-d-information-a-l-intention-des-patients-et-des-usagers-du-systeme-de-sante. Accessed 24 Feb 2023.

Friedman, D. B., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2006). A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education & Behavior, 33, 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198105277329

Article  Google Scholar 

Conquet, A., & Richaudeau, F. (1973). Cinq méthodes de mesure de la lisibilité. Commun Lang, 17, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.3406/colan.1973.3978

Article  Google Scholar 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Using readability formulas: A cautionary note. https://www.montefiore.org/documents/ToolkitPart07.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2023.

The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and User’s Guide. https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/patient-education/pemat.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2023.

Clerehan, R., Guillemin, F., Epstein, J., & Buchbinder, R. (2016). Using the evaluative linguistic framework for questionnaires to assess comprehensibility of self-report health questionnaires. Value Health, 19, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.008

Article  PubMed