Goldsmith MF. For better hip replacement results, surgeon’s best friend may be a robot. JAMA. 1992;267(5):613–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, Goddard MS, Smith BP, Mofidi A, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1296–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Pierce TP, Jauregui JJ, Mont MA. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(1):47–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(6):727–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7):1054–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bargar WL, Bauer A, Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998(354):82–91.

Callaghan JJ, Bracha P, Liu SS, Piyaworakhun S, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2617–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Pierce TP, Beaver WB, Issa K, Mont MA. Long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2164–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in Arthroplasty: a Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2353–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sakellariou VI, Poultsides LA, Ma Y, Bae J, Liu S, Sculco TP. Risk Assessment for Chronic Pain and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016;39(1):55–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lavand’homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review focusing on the stratification of patients at risk for persistent pain. Bone Joint J 2015, 97–b(10 Suppl A):45–48.

Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015, 97–b(6):793–801.

Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004(427 Suppl):S6–15.

Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2271–9.

Google Scholar 

Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(1):26–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed. Arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation–United States, 2010–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):869–73.

Google Scholar 

Murphy L, Helmick CG. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective: a population-based review of the fourth most common cause of hospitalization in U.S. adults. Orthop Nurs. 2012;31(2):85–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC, Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(7):1497–503.

Article  Google Scholar 

Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Kington RS, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(8):635–46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(17):1749–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dalton DM, Burke TP, Kelly EG, Curtin PD. Quantitative analysis of Technological Innovation in knee arthroplasty: using Patent and Publication Metrics to identify Developments and Trends. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(6):1366–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(4):249–54.

Google Scholar 

Matassi F, Pettinari F, Frasconà F, Innocenti M, Civinini R. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2023;24(1):24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(2):188–97.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):635–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mancino F, Jones CW, Benazzo F, Singlitico A, Giuliani A, De Martino I. Where are we now and what are we hoping to achieve with robotic total knee arthroplasty? A critical analysis of the current knowledge and future perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:339–49.

Google Scholar 

Innocenti B, Bori E. Robotics in orthopaedic surgery: why, what and how? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(12):2035–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karthik K, Colegate-Stone T, Dasgupta P, Tavakkolizadeh A, Sinha J. Robotic surgery in trauma and orthopaedics: a systematic review. Bone Joint J 2015, 97–b(3):292–299.

Bagaria V, Sadigale OS, Pawar PP, Bashyal RK, Achalare A, Poduval M. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty (RAKA): the technique, the Technology and the transition. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(6):745–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214(1):129–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(973):743–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(7):600–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sousa PL, Sculco PK, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA, Ast MP, Chalmers BP. Robots in the operating room during hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(3):309–17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de González A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Netravali NA, Shen F, Park Y, Bargar WL. A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:970703.

Article  Google Scholar 

Conditt MA, Roche MW. Minimally invasive robotic-arm-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 1):63–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Plate JF, Mofidi A, Mannava S, Smith BP, Lang JE, Poehling GG, Conditt MA, Jinnah RH. Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:837167.

Article  Google Scholar 

Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(7):1069–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):118–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Koulalis D, O’Loughlin PF, Plaskos C, Kendoff D, Cross MB, Pearle AD. Sequential versus automated cutting guides in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2011;18(6):436–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Suero EM, Plaskos C, Dixon PL, Pearle AD. Adjustable cutting blocks improve alignment and surgical time in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(9):1736–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lonner JH, Smith JR, Picard F, Hamlin B, Rowe PJ, Riches PE. High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):206–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lonner JH. Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2 Suppl):3–6.

Google Scholar 

Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2 Suppl):7–9.

Google Scholar 

Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):141–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pearle AD, O’Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(2):230–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Citak M, Suero EM, Citak M, Dunbar NJ, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA, Pearle AD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique? Knee. 2013;20(4):268–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tamam C, Plate JF, Augart M, Poehling GG, Jinnah RH. Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Robotic Assisted Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2015, 2015:747309.

Schulz AP, Seide K, Queitsch C, von Haugwitz A, Meiners J, Kienast B, Tarabolsi M, Kammal M, Jürgens C. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3(4):301–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nawabi DH, Conditt MA, Ranawat AS, Dunbar NJ, Jones J, Banks S, Padgett DE. Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013;227(3):302–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):329–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liow MH, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(12):2373–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yildirim G, Fernandez-Madrid I, Schwarzkopf R, Walker PS, Karia R. Comparison of robot surgery modular and total knee arthroplasty kinematics. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(2):157–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bukowski BR, Anderson P, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Mont MA, Illgen RL. 2nd: Improved Functional Outcomes with robotic compared with manual total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:303–8.

Google Scholar 

Illgen RLN, Bukowski BR, Abiola R, Anderson P, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty: outcomes at Minimum two-year Follow-Up. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:365–72.

Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(4):1132–41.