Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: A Population-based Comparative Analysis of Complication Rates.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27: 61-67View in Article Google ScholarKavanagh B.F. Dewitz M.A. Ilstrup D.M. et al.Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Fifteen-year results.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71: 1496-1503View in Article Google ScholarHarris W.H. Barrack R.L.Developments in diagnosis of the painful total hip replacement.
Orthop Rev. 1993; 22: 439-447View in Article Google ScholarGwam C.U. Mistry J.B. Mohamed N.S. et al.Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013.
J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 2088-2092View in Article Google ScholarKurtz S. Mowat F. Ong K. et al.Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1487-1497View in Article Google ScholarKatz J.N. Wright E.A. Wright J. et al.Twelve-year risk of revision after primary total hip replacement in the U.S. Medicare population.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 1825-1832View in Article Google ScholarFritz J. Lurie B. Miller T.T. et al.MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants.
Radiographics. 2014; 34: E106-E132View in Article Google ScholarSahr M. Tan E.T. Sneag D.B.3D MRI of the Spine.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021; 25: 433-440View in Article Google ScholarTalbot B.S. Weinberg E.P.MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Radiographics. 2016; 36: 209-225View in Article Google ScholarGutierrez L.B. Do B.H. Gold G.E. et al.MR imaging near metallic implants using MAVRIC SL: initial clinical experience at 3T.
Acad Radiol. 2015; 22: 370-379View in Article Google ScholarZochowski K.C. Miranda M.A. Cheung J. et al.MRI of Hip Arthroplasties: Comparison of Isotropic Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Selective (MAVRIC SL) Acquisitions With a Conventional MAVRIC SL Acquisition.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 213: W277-W286View in Article Google ScholarKebbach M.S.C. Meyenburg C. Kluess D. et al.A MRI-Based Patient-Specific Computational Framework for the Calculation of Range of Motion of Total Hip Replacements.
Appl Sci. 2021; 11: 2852View in Article Google ScholarPotter H.G. Nestor B.J. Sofka C.M. et al.Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 1947-1954View in Article Google ScholarPellicci P.M. Bostrom M. Poss R.Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 355: 224-228View in Article Google ScholarHayter C.L. Koff M.F. Potter H.G.Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 35: 1013-1025View in Article Google ScholarWalther M. Harms H. Krenn V. et al.Synovial tissue of the hip at power Doppler US: correlation between vascularity and power Doppler US signal.
Radiology. 2002; 225: 225-231View in Article Google ScholarMurakami A.M. Hash T.W. Hepinstall M.S. et al.MRI evaluation of rotational alignment and synovitis in patients with pain after total knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94: 1209-1215View in Article Google ScholarKoff M.F. Esposito C. Shah P. et al.MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions: A Cross-sectional Study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477: 159-174View in Article Google ScholarMalchau H. Karrholm J. Wang Y.X. et al.Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1995; 66: 418-424View in Article Google ScholarFritz J. Lurie B. Miller T.T.Imaging of hip arthroplasty.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013; 17: 316-327View in Article Google ScholarCampbell J. Rajaee S. Brien E. et al.Inflammatory pseudotumor after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.
Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3: 83-87View in Article Google ScholarNodzo S.R. Esposito C.I. Potter H.G. et al.MRI, Retrieval Analysis, and Histologic Evaluation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 1647-1653View in Article Google ScholarCampbell P. Ebramzadeh E. Nelson S. et al.Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 2321-2327View in Article Google ScholarSchmalzried T.P.Metal-metal bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty.
Orthopedics. 2009; 32https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090728-06View in Article Google ScholarEbreo D. Bell P.J. Arshad H. et al.Serial magnetic resonance imaging of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Follow-up of a cohort of 28 mm Ultima TPS THRs.
Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B: 1035-1039View in Article Google ScholarKoff M.F. Gao M.A. Neri J.P. et al.Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479: 2633-2650View in Article Google ScholarLiow M.H. Urish K.L. Preffer F.I. et al.Metal Ion Levels Are Not Correlated With Histopathology of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Taper Corrosion of Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 1797-1802View in Article Google ScholarNawabi D.H. Gold S. Lyman S. et al.MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 471-481View in Article Google Scholarvan der Weegen W. Brakel K. Horn R.J. et al.Asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing show little change within one year.
Bone Joint Lett J. 2013; 95-B: 1626-1631View in Article Google ScholarSmeekes C. Schouten B.J.M. Nix M. et al.Pseudotumor in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a comparison study of three grading systems with MRI.
Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 47: 1099-1109View in Article Google ScholarOng K.L. Kurtz S.M. Lau E. et al.Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population.
J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 105-109View in Article Google ScholarLi A.E. Johnson C.C. Sneag D.B. et al.Frondlike Synovitis on MRI and Correlation With Polyethylene Surface Damage of Total Knee Arthroplasty.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209: W231-W237View in Article Google ScholarPlodkowski A.J. Hayter C.L. Miller T.T. et al.Lamellated hyperintense synovitis: potential MR imaging sign of an infected knee arthroplasty.
Radiology. 2013; 266: 256-260View in Article Google ScholarKoff M.F. Burge A.J. Potter H.G.Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T.
J Orthop Res. 2020; 38: 1455-1464View in Article Google ScholarNam D. Salih R. Nahhas C.R. et al.Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient?.
Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 365-371View in Article Google ScholarCooper H.J. Ranawat A.S. Potter H.G. et al.Early reactive synovitis and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 3278-3285View in Article Google ScholarWalde T.A. Weiland D.E. Leung S.B. et al.Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 437: 138-144View in Article Google ScholarHarris W.H. McGann W.A.Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 1064-1066View in Article Google ScholarCohn R.M. Schwarzkopf R. Jaffe F.Heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011; 40: E232-E235View in Article Google ScholarLedermann H.P. Schweitzer M.E. Morrison W.B.Pelvic heterotopic ossification: MR imaging characteristics.
Radiology. 2002; 222: 189-195View in Article Google ScholarHug K.T. Alton T.B. Gee A.O.Classifications in brief: Brooker classification of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 2154-2157View in Article Google ScholarBodley R. Jamous A. Short D.Ultrasound in the early diagnosis of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal injuries.
Paraplegia. 1993; 31: 500-506View in Article Google ScholarRosteius T. Suero E.M. Grasmucke D. et al.The sensitivity of ultrasound screening examination in detecting heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury.
Spinal Cord. 2017; 55: 71-73View in Article Google ScholarBricteux S. Beguin L. Fessy M.H.[Iliopsoas impingement in 12 patients with a total hip arthroplasty].
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87 (Le conflit ilio-psoas - prothese dans les arthroplasties totales de hanche douloureuses): 820-825View in Article Google ScholarGuillin R. Bertaud V. Garetier M. et al.Ultrasound in Total Hip Replacement: Value of Anterior Acetabular Cup Visibility and Contact With the Iliopsoas Tendon.
J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37: 1439-1446View in Article Google ScholarAdler R.S. Buly R. Ambrose R. et al.Diagnostic and therapeutic use of sonography-guided iliopsoas peritendinous injections.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 940-943View in Article Google ScholarNunley R.M. Wilson J.M. Gilula L. et al.Iliopsoas bursa injections can be beneficial for pain after total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 519-526View in Article Google ScholarNichols C.I. Vose J.G.Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31 (e3): 1400-1406View in Article Google ScholarSmith D. Berdis G. Singh V. et al.Postoperative Fluid Collections in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.
Orthop Res Rev. 2022; 14: 43-57View in Article Google ScholarUnger E.C. Glazer H.S. Lee J.K. et al.MRI of extracranial hematomas: preliminary observations.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 403-407View in Article Google Scholar
Comments (0)