Forcing an Effortless Stance: The Lived Body in Social Anxiety Disorder

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply

Start free trial

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: July 21, 2022
Accepted: January 09, 2023
Published online: February 14, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP

Abstract

Introduction: The fear of scrutiny central in social anxiety disorder (SAD) points to a problem of the interpersonally perceivable body. Whereas the predominant cognitive-behavioral (CBT) account of the disorder understands this as a problem of excessive self-focused attention, the phenomenological literature reveals it as a sign of a fundamental transformation of body experience. The lived body absent from experience becomes the object body at the forefront of it. The present paper contributes to this literature by refining and grounding these notions in first-person descriptions of concrete experiences of social anxiety. Method: Repeated interviews were conducted with eight informants struggling with social anxiety and collected personal diaries. The interviews were informed by phenomenological concepts and a specific line of inquiry on body experiences. The analysis tested iteratively a set of phenomenologically grounded hypotheses of altered body experience against the first-person descriptions. Results: A concept of bodily instrumentalization is developed which accounts for the tendency of self-directed attention and behavior central to the disorder. That is, the socially anxious patient experiences their body as entrapped by the Other and thus unable to act freely among them. This felt bodily self-enslavement for the Other shows itself in efforts to conceal the body from the others and to puppeteer it for them. Discussion: The notion of bodily enslavement captures a central aspect of the suffering experienced by patients with SAD that exceeds the capability of the CBT language. Additionally, the social nature of the bodily instrumentalization that is constitutive of this suffering means that psychotherapy should not treat SAD as a cognitive disorder, but rather as an interpersonal disorder. Specifically, psychotherapy should offer patients shared interpersonal experiences in which they forget their bodily presence.

© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel

References APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. Gerlach AL, Mourlane D, Rist F. Public and private heart rate feedback in social phobia: a manipulation of anxiety visibility. Cogn Behav Ther. 2004;33(1):36–45. Guterstam A, Abdulkarim Z, Ehrsson HH. Illusory ownership of an invisible body reduces autonomic and subjective social anxiety responses. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):9831. Aderka IM, Gutner CA, Lazarov A, Hermesh H, Hofmann SG, Marom S. Body image in social anxiety disorder, obsessive: compulsive disorder, and panic disorder. Body Image. 2014;11(1):51–6. Pawijit Y, Likhitsuwan W, Ludington J, Pisitsungkagarn K. Looks can be deceiving: body image dissatisfaction relates to social anxiety through fear of negative evaluation. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017;31(4):1–7. Reid DJ, Reid FJM. Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. CyberPsychol Behav. 2007;10(3):424–35. Shepherd R-M, Edelmann RJ. Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personal Ind Dif. 2005;39(5):949–58. Fuchs T. The phenomenology of shame, guilt and the body in body dysmorphic disorder and depression. J Phenomenol Psychol. 2002;33(2):223–43. Trigg D. The body of the other: intercorporeality and the phenomenology of agoraphobia. Cont Philos Rev. 2013;46(3):413–29. Fuchs T. The psychopathology of hyperreflexivity. J Speculative Philos. 2010;24(3):239–55. Kristiansen MV. The absence of a tomorrow: lived time in social anxiety disorder. Forthcoming. Kristiansen MV. Looking for places to be alone: lived space in social anxiety disorder. Forthcoming. Jacobson K, Binghamton University State University of New York. Agoraphobia and hypochondria as disorders of dwelling. Int Stud Philos. 2004;36(2):31–44. Kagedan BU. Disorders of the other: toward a phenomenology of social anxiety [doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University: The Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology; 2018. Tanaka S. Body-as-Object in social situations: toward a phenomenology of social anxiety. In: Tewes C, Stanghellini G, editors. Time and body: phenomenological and psychopathological approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 150–69. Spremberg A. Commentary on “Body-as-Object in social situations: toward a phenomenology of social anxiety”. In: Tewes C, Stanghellini G, editors. Time and body: phenomenological and psychopathological approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 170–3. Pilling S, Mayo-Wilson E, Mavranezouli I, Kew K, Taylor C, Clark DM, et al. Recognition, assessment and treatment of social anxiety disorder: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2013;346:f2541. Clark DM, Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia. In: Heimberg RG, Liebowitz MR, Hope DA, Schneier FR, editors. Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. New York: The Guilford Press; 1995. p. 69–93. Hope DA, Heimberg RG, Klein JF. Social anxiety and the recall of interpersonal information. J Cogn Psychother. 1990;4(2):185–95. Hackmann A, Surawy C, Clark DM. Seeing yourself through others’ eyes: a study of spontaneously occurring images in social phobia. Behav Cognit Psychother. 1998;26(1):S1352465898000022–12. Beidel DC, Turner SM, Dancu CV. Physiological, cognitive and behavioral aspects of social anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1985;23(2):109–17. Wells A, Papageorgiou C. Social phobia: effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking. Behav Ther. 1998;29(3):357–70. Sartre J-P. Being and nothingness: an essay in phenomenological ontology. Washington: Washington Square Press; 1993. Leder D. Toward a phenomenology of pain. Rev Exist Psychol Psychiatr. 1984;19(2–3):255–66. Fanon F. Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove press; 2008. Dolezal L. The body and shame: phenomenology, feminism, and the socially shaped body. Lexington Books; 2015. Dreyfus HL. Skillful coping: essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 2014. Berg JHVD. The human body and the significance of human movement: a phenomenological study. Philos Phenomenological Res. 1952;13(2):159–83. Fischer WF. The psychology of anxiety: a phenomenological description. Humanistic Psychol. 1991;19(3):289–300. Schultz LT, Heimberg RG. Attentional focus in social anxiety disorder: potential for interactive processes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(7):1206–21. Spurr JM, Stopa L. The observer perspective: effects on social anxiety and performance. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(9):1009–28. Lim MH, Rodebaugh TL, Zyphur MJ, Gleeson JFM. Loneliness over time: the crucial role of social anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125(5):620–30. Henriksen MG, Jansson LB, Nordgaard J. A cookbook recipe for the clinical and phenomenologically informed, semi-structured diagnostic interview. In: Biondi M, Picardi A, Pallagrosi M, Fonzi L, editors. The clinician in the psychiatric diagnostic process. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 37–50. Morrison AS, Heimberg RG. Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9(1):249–74. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. Nielsen M. ADHD and temporality: a desynchronized way of being in the world. Med Anthropol. 2017;36(3):260–72. Køster A. Bereavement and the meaning of profound feelings of emptiness: an existential-phenomenological analysis. In: Tewes C, Stanghellini G, editors. Time and body: phenomenological and psychopathological approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 125–43. Parnas J, Sass LA. Self, solipsism, and schizophrenic delusions. Philos Psych Amp Psychol. 2001;8(2):101–20. Køster A, Fernandez AV. Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research. Phenomenol Cog Sci. 2021:1–21. Kristiansen MV. Fænomenologi som dvælen ved erfaringens merhed. Qual Stud. 2022;7(1):64–85. Buetow S. The traveller, miner, cleaner and conductor: idealized roles of the qualitative interviewer. J Health Serv Res Pol. 2013;18(1):51–4. Zahavi D. The practice of phenomenology: the case of Max van Manen. Nurs Philos. 2020;21(2):e12276. Fernandez AV, Køster A. On the subject matter of phenomenological psychopathology. In: Stanghellini G, Broome M, Fernandez AV, Fusar-Poli P, Raballo A, Rosfort R, editors. The Oxford handbook of phenomenological psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 191–204. Schmitz H. Der Leib. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter; 2011. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception: Routledge; 1982. Straus EW. Phenomenological psychology: selected papers. New York: Basic Books; 1966. Runyan WM. Why did Van Gogh cut off his ear? The problem of alternative explanations in psychobiography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981;40(6):1070–7. Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51. Kristiansen MV. Feeling like a perpetual outsider: the lived self-other relationship in social anxiety disorder. Forthcoming. Tellenbach H. Der typus melancholicus. In: Melancholie. Berlin:Springer; 1961. p. 44–107. Føllesdal D. Hermeneutics and the hypothetico-deductive method. Dialectica. 1979;33(3–4):319–36. Norcross JC, Wampold BE. Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy. 2011;48(1):98–102. Fuchs T. Psychotherapy of the lived space: a phenomenological and ecological concept. Am J Psychother. 2007;61(4):423–39. Škodlar B, Henriksen MG. Toward a phenomenological psychotherapy for schizophrenia. Psychopathology. 2019;52(2):117–25. Binswanger L. Basic forms and knowledge of human existence. Munich: Ernst Reinhard; 1962. Fuchs T, Messas GP, Stanghellini G. More than just description: phenomenology and psychotherapy. Psychopathology. 2019;52(2):63–6. Ratcliffe M. Phenomenology as a form of empathy. Inquiry. 2012;55(5):473–95. Halling S, Dearborn Nill J. A brief history of existential-phenomenological psychiatry and psychotherapy. J Phenomenol Psychol. 1995;26(1):1–45. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: July 21, 2022
Accepted: January 09, 2023
Published online: February 14, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Comments (0)

No login
gif