Andrews, S., Veldre, A. (2019). What is the most plausible account of the role of parafoveal processing in reading? Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(7), Article e12344. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12344
Google Scholar | Crossref Barca, L., Pezzulo, G. (2012). Unfolding visual lexical decision in time. PLOS ONE, 7(4), Article e35932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035932
Google Scholar | Crossref Barca, L., Pezzulo, G. (2015). Tracking second thoughts: Continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision. PLOS ONE, 10(2), Article e0116193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116193
Google Scholar | Crossref Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Google Scholar | Crossref Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Google Scholar | Crossref Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(9), 1798–1819. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.67243
Google Scholar Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K. (2013). Letter trans-positions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2389–2410. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.782326
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Brysbaert, M., New, B. (2009). Moving beyond KuČera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
Google Scholar | Crossref Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
Google Scholar | Crossref Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087476
Google Scholar | Crossref Chen, X., Dong, Y. (2019). Evaluating objective and subjective frequency measures in L2 lexical processing. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale de Linguistique Generale, 230, Article 102738.
Google Scholar Chen, Y., Liu, H., Yu, M., Dang, J. (2020). The development on transposed-letter effect in English word recognition: Evidence from late unbalanced Chinese-English bilinguals. Lingua, 235, Article 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102777
Google Scholar | Crossref Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
Google Scholar | Crossref Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
Google Scholar | Crossref DeBruine, L. M., Barr, D. J. (2021). Understanding mixed-effects models through data simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920965119
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Dijkstra, A., Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA-model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J., Jacobs, A. (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189–225). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Dijkstra, T., Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012
Google Scholar | Crossref Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., Van Halem, N., Al-Jibouri, Z., De Korte, M., Rekké, S. (2019). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000287
Google Scholar | Crossref Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105(3), 691–703. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
Google Scholar | Crossref Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1557–1575. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2
Google Scholar | Crossref Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3–37). Psychology Press.
Google Scholar Frost, R. (2012a). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841
Google Scholar | Crossref Frost, R. (2012b). A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 310–329. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000635
Google Scholar | Crossref Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–600. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
Google Scholar | Crossref Grainger, J. (2003). Moving eyes and reading words: How can a computational model combine the two? In Hyona, J., Radach, R., Deubel, H. (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 457–470). Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A “mid-level” vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Grainger, J., van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin, P. (Ed.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–23). Nova Science Publishers.
Google Scholar Henderson, J. M., Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
Google Scholar | Crossref Johnson, R. L., Dunne, M. D. (2012). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 191–212. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0025983
Google Scholar | Crossref Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 209–229. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
Google Scholar | Crossref Kahraman, H., Kirkici, B. (2021). Letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries in the second language processing of derived words: An exploratory study of individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(2), 417–446. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000673
Google Scholar | Crossref Kezilas, Y., McKague, M., Kohnen, S., Badcock, N. A., Castles, A. (2017). Disentangling the developmental trajectories of letter position and letter identity coding using masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 250–254. http://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000293
Google Scholar | Crossref Kroll, J. F., Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
Google Scholar | Crossref Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). LmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(1), 1–26. http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Google Scholar | Crossref Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., Chung, S. T. L. (2001). Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41(6), 725–743. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00295-9
Google Scholar | Crossref Leung, C. Y., Sugiura, M., Daisuke, A., Yoshikawa, L. (2014). The perceptual span in second language reading: An eye-tracking study using a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(5), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.45051
Google Scholar | Crossref Li, J., Taft, M. (2020). The processing of English prefixed words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000172
Google Scholar | Crossref Lin, Y. C., Lin, P. Y. (2016). Mouse tracking traces the “Camrbidge Unievrsity” effects in monolingual and bilingual minds. Acta Psychologica, 167(3), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.001
Google Scholar | Crossref Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I. (2007). Lexical and sublexical influences on eye movements during reading. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00003.x
Google Scholar | Crossref Luke, S. G., Christianson, K. (2013). The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(7), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.832682
Google Scholar | Crossref Luke, S. G., Christianson, K. (2015). Predicting inflectional morphology from context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(6), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1009918
Google Scholar | Crossref Marcet, A., Perea, M. (2018). Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique. Acta Psychologica, 190, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.007
Google Scholar | Crossref Masserang, K. M., Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.658037
Google Scholar | Crossref Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Jamil, T. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs [R package version 0.9.12-2]. https://cran.rproject.org/package=BayesFactor
Google Scholar Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Parafoveal pre-processing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000175
Google Scholar | Crossref Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., Liversedge, S. P. (2021). The influence of children’s reading ability on initial letter position encoding during a reading-like task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000989
Google Scholar | Crossref Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., García-Orza, J., Carreiras, M. (2011). Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 902–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.512088
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Perea, M., Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193863
Google Scholar | Crossref Perea, M., Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does Judge activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196438
Google Scholar | Crossref Perea, M., Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
Google Scholar | Crossref R Core Team . (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.Rproject.org/
Google Scholar Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
Google Scholar | Crossref Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
Google Scholar | Crossref Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 206–226. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90009-2
Google Scholar | Crossref Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D. (2012). Default bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
Google Scholar | Crossref Rueckl, J. G., Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 482–508. http://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
Google Scholar | Crossref Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 988–996. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
Google Scholar | Crossref Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5),