Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Young, C. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106, 87–129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Bernolet, S., Collina, S., Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). The persistence of syntactic priming revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 99–116.
Google Scholar | Crossref Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–461.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Gleitman, L., Wanner, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 319–346). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Fisch, S. M., Weisberger, M. J., Blum, M. (1990). Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 17, 313–342.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Braine, M. D. S., Brooks, P. J. (1995). Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, M., Merriman, W. E. (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 353–376). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157.
Google Scholar | Crossref Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Stewart, A. J., McLean, J. F. (2000). Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1297–1302.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., Baayen, H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Bouma, G., Kramer, I., Zwarts, J. (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 69–94). Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Google Scholar Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720–738.
Google Scholar | Crossref Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K., Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children’s overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development, 70, 1325–1337.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Burnard, L. (2000). Reference guide for the British National Corpus (World edition). British National Corpus Consortium, Oxford University Computing Services.
Google Scholar Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., Wang, R., Branigan, H. P. (2015). It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments. Cognition, 136, 255–267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Carminati, M. N., Van Gompel, R. P. G., Wakeford, L. J. (2019). An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, Article 104031.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.
Google Scholar Corley, M., Scheepers, C. (2002). Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 126–131.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 447–456.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar Hardy, S. M., Messenger, K., Maylor, E. A. (2017). Aging and syntactic representations: Evidence of preserved syntactic priming and lexical boost. Psychology and Aging, 32, 588–596.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Hartsuiker, R. J., Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Jaeger, T. F., Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Kaplan, R. M., Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 173–281). MIT Press.
Google Scholar Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M., Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Malhotra, G., Pickering, M., Branigan, H., Bednar, J. A. (2008). On the persistence of structural priming: Mechanisms of decay and influence of word-forms (Vol. 30) [Proceedings]. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53m4r6dg
Google Scholar Maratsos, M., Gudeman, R., Gerard-Ngo, P., Dettart, G. (1987). A study of novel word learning: The productivity of the causative. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 89–113). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.
Google Scholar | Crossref Melinger, A., Dobel, C. (2005). Lexically-driven syntactic priming. Cognition, 98, B11–B20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition, 121, 268–274.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Montero-Melis, G., Jaeger, T. F. (2020). Changing expectations mediate adaptation in L2 production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 602–617.
Google Scholar | Crossref Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (7th ed.). (2005).
Google Scholar Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15.
Google Scholar | Crossref Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 586–605.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.
Google Scholar Pollard, C., Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar Reitter, D., Keller, F., Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Roland, D., Dick, F., Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 348–379.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89, 179–205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Scheepers, C., Crocker, M. W. (2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. In Carreiras, M., Clifton, C. J. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond (pp. 167–185). Psychology Press.
Google Scholar Scheepers, C., Raffray, C., Myachykov, A. (2017). The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 102–115.
Google Scholar | Crossref Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R., Pickering, M. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80.
Google Scholar | Crossref Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development, 19, 15–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref Van Gompel, R. P. G., Arai, M., Pearson, J. (2012). The representation of mono- and intransitive structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 384–406.
Google Scholar | Crossref Van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., Jacob, G. (2006). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 335–362.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI