The nature of perceptual units in Chinese character recognition

Anderson, R. C., Ku, Y.-M., Li, W., Chen, X., Wu, X., Shu, H. (2013). Learning to see the patterns in Chinese characters. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 41–56.
Google Scholar | Crossref Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511801686
Google Scholar Chen, J.-Y., Cherng, R.-J. (2013). The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 517.
Google Scholar | Crossref Chen, Y.-C., Yeh, S.-L. (2015). Binding radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47–63.
Google Scholar | Crossref Chen, Y.-P., Allport, A. (1995). Attention and lexical decomposition in Chinese word recognition: Conjunctions of form and position guide selective attention. Visual Cognition, 2(2–3), 235–267.
Google Scholar | Crossref Chen, Y.-P., Allport, D. A., Marshall, J. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49(4), 1024–1043.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Chetail, F. (2020). Are graphemic effects real in skilled visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104085.
Google Scholar | Crossref Chetail, F., Content, A. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels. Psychological Science, 25(1), 243–249.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Cjklib 0.3.2 . (2012). https://pypi.org/project/cjklib/
Google Scholar Damian, M. F., Qu, Q. (2017). Exploring the role of logographemes in Chinese handwritten word production. Reading and Writing, 32(1), 147–173.
Google Scholar | Crossref Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Ding, G., Peng, D., Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Drewnowski, A., Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 636–647.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Fan, K. Y. (1986, September). Graphic symbol of the Chinese character [Paper presentation]. Symposium of Chinese Character Modernization, Beijing, China.
Google Scholar Fan, K. Y., Gao, J. Y., Ao, X. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing systems. Chinese Character Reform, 3, 19–22.
Google Scholar Grainger, J., Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin, P. (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). Nova Science.
Google Scholar Greenberg, S. N., Healy, A. F., Koriat, A., Kreiner, H. (2004). The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 428–433.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Greenberg, S. N., Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1051–1061.
Google Scholar | Crossref Han, Z., Zhang, Y., Shu, H., Bi, Y. (2007). The orthographic buffer in writing Chinese characters: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 431–450.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 333–344.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N., Goldshmid, Y. (1991). The missing-letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 66–80.
Google Scholar | Crossref Law, S. P., Leung, M. T. (2000). Structural representations of characters in Chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Psychologia, 43, 67–83.
Google Scholar Luo, C., Proctor, R. W., Weng, X. (2015). A Stroop effect emerges in the processing of complex Chinese characters that contain a color-related radical. Psychological Research, 79(2), 221–229.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Luo, C., Proctor, R. W., Weng, X., Li, X. (2014). Spatial Stroop interference occurs in the processing of radicals of ideogrammic compounds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 715–720.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline McBride, C. A. (2015). Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 523–549.
Google Scholar | Crossref McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Mo, C., Yu, M., Seger, C., Mo, L. (2015). Holistic neural coding of Chinese character forms in bilateral ventral visual system. Brain and Language, 141, 28–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Myers, J. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 461–475.
Google Scholar | Crossref R Core Team . (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Google Scholar Reichle, E. D., Yu, L. (2017). Models of Chinese reading: Review and analysis. Cognitive Science, 42, 1154–1165.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75(1), B1–B12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline RStudio Team . (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/
Google Scholar Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.318
Google Scholar Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In Coltheart, M. (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Sun, C. C., Hendrix, P., Ma, J. Q., Baayen, R. H. (2018). Chinese lexical database (CLD): A large-scale lexical database for simplified Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2606–2629.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Taft, M., Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775.
Google Scholar | Crossref Tsang, Y.-K., Wu, Y., Ng, T.-Y., Chen, H.-C. (2017). Semantic activation of phonetic radicals in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 618–636.
Google Scholar | Crossref Wang, X., Pei, M., Wu, Y., Su, Y. (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2230.
Google Scholar | Crossref Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Wong, K., Li, W., Xu, R., Zhang, Z. (2010). Introduction to Chinese natural language processing. Morgan & Claypool.
Google Scholar Yeh, S. L., Chou, W. L., Ho, P. (2017). Lexical processing of Chinese sub-character components: Semantic activation of phonetic radicals as revealed by the Stroop effect. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15782.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Yin, L., McBride, C. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Yu, L., Xiong, J., Zhang, Q., Drieghe, D., Reichle, E. D. (2019). Eye-movement evidence for the mental representation of strokes in Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 544–551.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Comments (0)

No login
gif