Anderson, R. C., Ku, Y.-M., Li, W., Chen, X., Wu, X., Shu, H. (2013). Learning to see the patterns in Chinese characters. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 41–56.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511801686 Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y., Cherng, R.-J. (2013). The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 517.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Chen, Y.-C., Yeh, S.-L. (2015). Binding radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47–63.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Chen, Y.-P., Allport, A. (1995). Attention and lexical decomposition in Chinese word recognition: Conjunctions of form and position guide selective attention. Visual Cognition, 2(2–3), 235–267.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Chen, Y.-P., Allport, D. A., Marshall, J. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49(4), 1024–1043.
Google Scholar |
SAGE Journals |
ISI
Chetail, F. (2020). Are graphemic effects real in skilled visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104085.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Chetail, F., Content, A. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels. Psychological Science, 25(1), 243–249.
Google Scholar |
SAGE Journals |
ISI
Cjklib 0.3.2 . (2012).
https://pypi.org/project/cjklib/ Google Scholar
Damian, M. F., Qu, Q. (2017). Exploring the role of logographemes in Chinese handwritten word production. Reading and Writing, 32(1), 147–173.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Ding, G., Peng, D., Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Drewnowski, A., Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 636–647.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Fan, K. Y. (1986, September). Graphic symbol of the Chinese character [Paper presentation]. Symposium of Chinese Character Modernization, Beijing, China.
Google Scholar
Fan, K. Y., Gao, J. Y., Ao, X. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing systems. Chinese Character Reform, 3, 19–22.
Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin, P. (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). Nova Science.
Google Scholar
Greenberg, S. N., Healy, A. F., Koriat, A., Kreiner, H. (2004). The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 428–433.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Greenberg, S. N., Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1051–1061.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Han, Z., Zhang, Y., Shu, H., Bi, Y. (2007). The orthographic buffer in writing Chinese characters: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 431–450.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 333–344.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI
Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N., Goldshmid, Y. (1991). The missing-letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 66–80.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Law, S. P., Leung, M. T. (2000). Structural representations of characters in Chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Psychologia, 43, 67–83.
Google Scholar
Luo, C., Proctor, R. W., Weng, X. (2015). A Stroop effect emerges in the processing of complex Chinese characters that contain a color-related radical. Psychological Research, 79(2), 221–229.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Luo, C., Proctor, R. W., Weng, X., Li, X. (2014). Spatial Stroop interference occurs in the processing of radicals of ideogrammic compounds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 715–720.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
McBride, C. A. (2015). Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 523–549.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
ISI
Mo, C., Yu, M., Seger, C., Mo, L. (2015). Holistic neural coding of Chinese character forms in bilateral ventral visual system. Brain and Language, 141, 28–34.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Myers, J. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Routledge.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI
Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 461–475.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
R Core Team . (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Reichle, E. D., Yu, L. (2017). Models of Chinese reading: Review and analysis. Cognitive Science, 42, 1154–1165.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75(1), B1–B12.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
RStudio Team . (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC.
http://www.rstudio.com/ Google Scholar
Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 318–334.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.318 Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In Coltheart, M. (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Sun, C. C., Hendrix, P., Ma, J. Q., Baayen, R. H. (2018). Chinese lexical database (CLD): A large-scale lexical database for simplified Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2606–2629.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Taft, M., Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Tsang, Y.-K., Wu, Y., Ng, T.-Y., Chen, H.-C. (2017). Semantic activation of phonetic radicals in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 618–636.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Wang, X., Pei, M., Wu, Y., Su, Y. (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2230.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI
Wong, K., Li, W., Xu, R., Zhang, Z. (2010). Introduction to Chinese natural language processing. Morgan & Claypool.
Google Scholar
Yeh, S. L., Chou, W. L., Ho, P. (2017). Lexical processing of Chinese sub-character components: Semantic activation of phonetic radicals as revealed by the Stroop effect. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15782.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Yin, L., McBride, C. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432.
Google Scholar |
SAGE Journals |
ISI
Yu, L., Xiong, J., Zhang, Q., Drieghe, D., Reichle, E. D. (2019). Eye-movement evidence for the mental representation of strokes in Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 544–551.
Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
Google Scholar |
Crossref
Comments (0)