Comparison of da Vinci SP and Xi surgical systems in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM (2018) Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. Jsls. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mazzone E, Mistretta FA, Knipper S, Tian Z, Larcher A, Widmer H et al (2019) Contemporary national assessment of Robot-assisted surgery rates and total hospital charges for major surgical Uro-oncological procedures in the United States. J Endourol 33(6):438–447

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Rogers T, Thiel D, Onol F, Roof S et al (2021) Applications of the Da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform in urology: a systematic literature review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 73(1):6–16

Google Scholar 

Moschovas MC, Seetharam Bhat KR, Onol FF, Rogers T, Ogaya-Pinies G, Roof S et al (2021) Single-port technique evolution and current practice in urologic procedures. Asian J Urol 8(1):100–104

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaouk J, Bertolo R, Eltemamy M, Garisto J (2019) Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first clinical experience using the SP surgical system. Urology 124:309

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, Cherullo E, Clayman R, Desai M et al (2008) Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol 22(11):2575–2581

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moschovas MC, Loy D, Patel E, Sandri M, Moser D, Patel V (2023) Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the Da Vinci SP and Da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 17(4):1341–1347

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Noël J, Moschovas MC, Sandri M, Bhat S, Rogers T, Reddy S et al (2022) Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci(®) single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg 16(2):473–481

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roy SS, Sathe AA, Watson MJ, Singh A (2023) Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: SP versus XI, a single surgeon experience. J Robot Surg 17(6):2817–2821

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saidian A, Fang AM, Hakim O, Magi-Galluzzi C, Nix JW, Rais-Bahrami S (2020) Perioperative outcomes of single vs multi-port robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single institutional experience. J Urol 204(3):490–495

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fang AM, Fazendin JM, Rais-Bahrami S, Porterfield JR (2023) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic adrenalectomy. Am Surg 89(5):1668–1672

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J et al (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Galsky MD, Stensland KD, Moshier E, Sfakianos JP, McBride RB, Tsao CK et al (2016) Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(8):825–832

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi J, Luo D, Weng H, Zeng XT, Lin L, Chu H et al (2020) Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary. Res Synth Methods 11(5):641–654

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi J, Luo D, Wan X, Liu Y, Liu J, Bian Z et al (2023) Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 32(7):1338–1360

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

von Hippel PT (2015) The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:35

Article  Google Scholar 

Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, Wang Y, Hanske J, Sammon JD et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol 70(5):837–845

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang P, Wagner AA, Regan MM, Smith JA, Saigal CS, Litwin MS et al (2022) Prospective multicenter comparison of open and robotic radical prostatectomy: the PROST-QA/RP2 consortium. J Urol 207(1):127–136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Hu K, Wang Y, Wu Y, Bao E, Wang J et al (2023) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Surg 17(6):2617–2631

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Kenfield SA (2015) Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the health professionals follow-up study. Eur Urol 67(3):432–438

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freire MP, Choi WW, Lei Y, Carvas F, Hu JC (2010) Overcoming the learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 37(1):37–47 Table of Contents

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reitano G, Tumminello A, Prevato C, Cacco A, Gaggiato G, Baù G et al (2025) Adrenalectomy performed with the Da Vinci single-port robotic system: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081372

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai A, Dobbs RW, Talamini S, Halgrimson WR, Wilson JO, Vigneswaran HT et al (2020) Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 9(2):898–905

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nguyen TT, Dobbs RW, Vuong HG, Quy K, Ngo HTT, Mai AT et al (2023) Single-port and multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. Prostate Int 11(4):187–194

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Noh TI, Kang YJ, Shim JS, Kang SH, Cheon J, Lee JG et al (2022) Single-port vs multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matching comparative study. J Endourol 36(5):661–667

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Francavilla S, Veccia A, Dobbs RW, Zattoni F, Vigneswaran HT, Antonelli A et al (2022) Radical prostatectomy technique in the robotic evolution: from Da Vinci standard to single port-a single surgeon pathway. J Robot Surg 16(1):21–27

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ju GQ, Wang ZJ, Shi JZ, Zhang ZQ, Wu ZJ, Yin L et al (2021) A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Asian J Androl 23(6):640–647

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang MM, Schwen ZR, Biles MJ, Alam R, Gabrielson AT, Patel HD et al (2021) A comparative analysis of surgical scar cosmesis based on operative approach for radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 35(2):138–143

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lei KY, Xie WJ, Fu SQ, Ma M, Sun T (2021) A comparison of the Da Vinci Xi vs. Da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. BMC Surg 21(1):409

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif