How do Health State Values Differ When Respondents Consider Adults Versus Children Living in Those States? A Systematic Review

Kwon J, Freijser L, Huynh E, Howell M, Chen G, Khan K, Daher S, Roberts N, Harrison C, Smith S, Devlin N, Howard K, Lancsar E, Bailey C, Craig J, Dalziel K, Hayes A, Mulhern B, Wong G, Ratcliffe J, Petrou S. Systematic review of conceptual, age, measurement and valuation considerations for generic multidimensional childhood patient-reported outcome measures. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40(4):379–431.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen G, Ratcliffe J. A review of the development and application of generic multi-attribute utility instruments for paediatric populations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(10):1013–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Furlong W, Rae C, Feeny D, Ghotra S, Breakey VR, Carter T, Pai N, Pullenayegum E, Xie F, Barr R. Generic health-related quality of life utility measure for preschool children (health utilities preschool): design, development, and properties. Value Health. 2023;26(2):251–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kwon J, Raghunandan R, Nghiem SH, Howard K, Lancsar E, Huynh E, et al. Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia. Value Health. 2025;28(1):88-98.

Beusterien KM, Yeung J-E, Pang F, Brazier J. Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:102.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moodie M, Richardson J, Rankin B, Iezzi A, Sinha K. Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four pacific countries using the assessment of quality-of-life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1014–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kang E. Validity of child health-6 dimension (CH-6D) for adolescents. Value Health. 2016;19(7):A854.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stevens K. Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2009;18(8):1105–13.

Google Scholar 

Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Stoskopf B, Hoult L, Furlong W, Feeny D, Hagan R. Development, reliability and validity of a new measure of overall health for pre-school children. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:243–52.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dalziel K, Catchpool M, Garcia-Lorenzo B, Gorostiza I, Norman R, Rivero-Arias O. Feasibility, validity and differences in adolescent and adult EQ-5D-Y health state valuation in Australia and Spain: an application of best-worst scaling. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(5):499–513.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jabrayilov R, van Asselt AD, Vermeulen KM, Volger S, Detzel P, Dainelli L, Krabbe PF, P.E. Group. A descriptive system for the Infant health-related Quality of life Instrument (IQI): measuring health with a mobile app. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0203276.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Seiber WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM. Quality of well being self-administered (QWB-SA) scale, vol. 41. San Diego: Health Services Research Center, University of California; 2008.

Google Scholar 

Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: health utilities index mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34(7):702–22.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40(2):113–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Verstraete J, Ramma L, Jelsma J. Validity and reliability testing of the toddler and infant (TANDI) health related quality of life instrument for very young children. J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2020;4:1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, Siimes MA, Kaitila I, Mäkelä A, Rantakari K. Quality of life in early adolescence: a sixteen dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:205–11.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, Siimes MA, Kaitila I, Mäkelä A, Erkkilä K. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:532–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramos-Goñi JM, Oppe M, Stolk E, Shah K, Kreimeier S, Rivero-Arias O, Devlin N. International valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(7):653–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arnold D, Girling A, Stevens A, Lilford R. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis. BMJ. 2009;339: b2688.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Saigal S, Feeny D, Rosenbaum P, Furlong W, Burrows E, Stoskopf B. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA. 1996;276(6):453–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tong A, Wong G, McTaggart S, Henning P, Mackie F, Carroll RP, Howard K, Craig JC. Quality of life of young adults and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1179-1185.e5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen G, Xu F, Huynh E, Wang Z, Stevens K, Ratcliffe J. Scoring the child health utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(1):163–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ratcliffe J, Huynh E, Chen G, Stevens K, Swait J, Brazier J, Sawyer M, Roberts R, Flynn T. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm. Soc Sci Med. 2016;157:48–59.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreimeier S, Oppe M, Ramos-Goni JM, Cole A, Devlin N, Herdman M, Mulhern B, Shah KK, Stolk E, Rivero-Arias O, Greiner W. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) health states: the impact of wording and perspective. Value Health. 2018;21(11):1291–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shah KK, Ramos-Goni JM, Kreimeier S, Devlin NJ. An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(7):1091–103.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kind P, Klose K, Gusi N, Olivares PR, Greiner W. Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(10):2519–39.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lang Z, Attema AE, Lipman SA. The effect of duration and time preference on the gap between adult and child health state valuations in time trade-off. European Journal of Health Economics. 2024;25(4):601-13

Lipman SA, Reckers-Droog VT, Karimi M, Jakubczyk M, Attema AE. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22(9):1507–18.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Astrom M, Conte H, Berg J, Burstrom K. “Like holding the axe on who should live or not”: adolescents’ and adults’ perceptions of valuing children’s health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(7):2133–42.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reckers-Droog V, Karimi M, Lipman S, Verstraete J. Why do adults value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states differently for themselves than for children and adolescents: a think-aloud study. Value Health. 2022;25(7):1174–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bailey C, Howell M, Raghunandan R, Dalziel K, Howard K, Mulhern B, Petrou S, Rowen D, Salisbury A, Viney R, Lancsar E, Devlin N. The RETRIEVE checklist for studies reporting the elicitation of stated preferences for child health-related quality of life. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024;42(4):435–46.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, Gagnon M-P, Griffiths F, Nicolau B, O’Cathain A. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018;34(4):285–91.

Google Scholar 

Cooper H, Valentine JC, Charlton K, Melson A. The effects of modified school calendars on student achievement and on school and community attitudes. Rev Educ Res. 2003;73(1):1–52.

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif