Güler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, Savun M, Sarilar O, Akbulut MF (2019) Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis 47(3):289–295

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ozgor F, Tepeler A, Elbir F, Sarilar O, Gurbuz ZG, Armagan A, Tasci AI (2016) Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of 10–20 mm renal stones in obese patients. World J Urol 34(8):1169–1173

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu C, Hua LX, Zhang JZ, Zhou XR, Zhong W, Ni HD (2017) Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 33(1):36–43

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Cai C, Duan X, Xu X, Mao H, Li X, la Rosette J (2021) Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a noninferior modality to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 20–40 mm renal calculi: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 79(1):114–121

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sakr A, Salem E, Kamel M, Desoky E, Ragab A, Omran M, Shahin A (2017) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience. Urolithiasis 45(6):585–589

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y (2010) Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 24(10):1579–1582

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song L, Chen Z, Liu T, Zhong J, Qin W, Guo S, Xie D (2011) The application of a patented system to minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0032

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jia H, Li J, Liu B, Zhang P, Yusufu A, Nan Y, Wang S (2021) Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1–2 cm) in children. World J Urol 39(1):195–200

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guddeti RS, Hegde P, Chawla A, de la Rosette JJMCH, Laguna Pes MP, Kapadia A (2020) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vs standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of <2 cm: a randomised controlled study. BJU Int 126(2):273–279

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu C, Song R, Lu P, Jiang M, Zeng G, Zhang W (2020) A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20–30 mm renal stones in obese patients. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8532

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, AlSmadi J, Zhu W, Liu Y, Wu W, Fan J, Zeng G (2018) Comparison of super-mini PCNL (SMP) versus miniperc for stones larger than 2 cm: a propensity score-matching study. World J Urol 36(6):955–961

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SMMH, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22(12):2677–2680

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fang Y, Qiu J, Wang D, Zhan H, Situ J (2012) Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 27(3):266–270

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL, Amarante RDM, Mattos MHE, Tobias-Machado M, Pompeo ACL (2012) Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol 187(1):164–168

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, Zhou Z, Xia A, Dai H, Guo L, Zheng J (2013) Clinical observation of different minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi. Pak J Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.296.3910

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B, Kumar N, Jha SK, Singh H (2015) A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones >2cm: a single-center experience. J Endourol 29(11):1248–1252

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shao Y, Wang D, Lu G, Shen Z (2015) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm. World J Urol 33(11):1841–1845

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu H, Xu L, Wang S, Yu X, Yang H, Peng E, Li C (2017) Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3483

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kaygisiz O, Coşkun B, Kiliçarslan H, Kordan Y, Vuruşkan H, Özmerdiven G, Yavaşcaoʇlu I (2015) Comparison of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal and mid-ureter stones. Urol Int 94(2):205–209

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, Meng J (2017) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Doğan K (2023) Comparative evaluation of retrograde intrarenal surgery using ureteral access sheath and fluoroscopy: a retrospective analysis on kidney stone treatment. J Med Palliat Care 4(5):472–477

Article  Google Scholar 

Lu GL, Wang XJ, Huang BX, Zhao Y, Tu WC, Jin XW, Wang DW (2021) Comparison of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones greater than 15 mm. Chin Med J 134(10):1209–1214

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bai Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Han P, Wang J (2017) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience. BMC Urol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0200-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Zhu W, Li J, Zhao Z, Zeng T, Liu C, Wan SP (2015) The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 33(8):1159–1164

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karami H, Mazloomfard MM, Lotfi B, Alizadeh A, Javanmard B (2013) Ultrasonography-guided PNL in comparison with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the management of large proximal ureteral stone. Int Braz J Urol 39(1):22–28

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bahar SHM, Amirhassani S, Nouralizadeh A, Zerafat-Jou N, Rasiuli J (2019) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus laparoscopy in the management of large proximal ureteral stones: the experience of two different settings. Urol J 16(5):448–452

Google Scholar 

Shi X, Peng Y, Li X, Wang Q, Li L, Liu M, Sun Y (2018) Propensity score-matched analysis comparing retrograde intrarenal surgery with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large stones in patients with a solitary kidney. J Endourol 32(3):198–204

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kirac M, Bozkurt ÖF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urol Res 41(3):241–246

Google Scholar 

Liao W, Yang S, Qian H, Song C, Xiong Y (2014) Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 10–20-mm renal stones: a 5-year retrospective study. Surg Pract 18(3):117–121

Article  Google Scholar 

Arrabal-Martin M, Arrabal-Polo MA, Lopez-Leon V, Merino-Salas S, Palao-Yago F, Cámara-Ortega M, Zuluaga-Gomez A (2012) The oblique supine decubitus position: technical description and comparison of results with the prone decubitus and dorsal supine decubitus positions. Urol Res 40(5):587–592

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar