Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820.
Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023;209(6):1082–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452.
Moul JW. The evolving definition of advanced prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2004;6(Suppl 8):S10–7.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Militaru FC, Militaru V, Crisan N, et al. Molecular basis and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review. Biomol Biomed. 2023;23(5):760–71. https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2023.8782.
Harris WP, Mostaghel EA, Nelson PS, Montgomery B. Androgen deprivation therapy: progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6(2):76–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1296.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(9):1119–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011.
Raja T, Sud R, Addla S, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: a comparative review of efficacy and safety. Indian J Cancer. 2022;59(Suppl 1):S142–59. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_65_21.
Van Poppel H, Abrahamsson P-A. Considerations for the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2020;27(10):830–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14303.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Prescribing information: ORGOVYX (relugolix) tablets, for oral use. 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/214621s000lbl.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2024.
Crawford ED, Heidenreich A, Lawrentschuk N, et al. Androgen-targeted therapy in men with prostate cancer: evolving practice and future considerations. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22(1):24–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0079-0.
Dearnaley DP, Saltzstein DR, Sylvester JE, et al. The oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist relugolix as neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy to external beam radiotherapy in patients with localised intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 2 trial. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):184–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.001.
Henry MA, Leung A, Filson CP. Cost considerations for systemic therapy for patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies. Cancer. 2018;124(14):2897–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31355.
Borrelli E, McGladrigan CG. PCN80 estimating the difference in annual out-of-pocket costs for relugolix and leuprolide for medicare patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Value Health. 2021;24(Suppl 1):S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.172.
Thompson IM. Flare associated with LHRH-agonist therapy. Rev Urol. 2001;3(Suppl 3):S10–4.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaku H, Saika T, Tsushima T, et al. Time course of serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels after cessation of long-term luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist treatment in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate. 2006;66(4):439–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20341.
Nascimento B, Miranda EP, Jenkins LC, Benfante N, Schofield EA, Mulhall JP. Testosterone recovery profiles after cessation of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2019;16(6):872–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.273.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fradin J, Kim FJ, Lu-Yao GL, Storozynsky E, Kelly WK. Review of cardiovascular risk of androgen deprivation therapy and the influence of race in men with prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(8):2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082316.
Klimis H, Pinthus JH, Aghel N, et al. The burden of uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors in men with prostate cancer. JACC: CardioOncol. 2023;5(1):70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.09.008.
Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4448–56. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2497.
O’Farrell S, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Van Hemelrijck M. Risk and timing of cardiovascular disease after androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(11):1243–51. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1792.
Shore ND, Abrahamsson P-A, Anderson J, Crawford ED, Lange P. New considerations for ADT in advanced prostate cancer and the emerging role of GnRH antagonists. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013;16(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2012.25.
Margel D, Peer A, Ber Y, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity in a randomized trial comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist among patients with advanced prostate cancer and preexisting cardiovascular disease. J Urol. 2019;202(6):1199–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000384.
Albertsen PC, Klotz L, Tombal B, Grady J, Olesen TK, Nilsson J. Cardiovascular morbidity associated with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists and an antagonist. Eur Urol. 2014;65(3):565–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.032.
Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, et al. Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2187–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004325.
Lopes RD, Higano CS, Slovin SF, et al. Cardiovascular safety of degarelix versus leuprolide in patients with prostate cancer: the primary results of the PRONOUNCE randomized trial. Circulation. 2021;144(16):1295–307. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056810.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dragomir A, Touma N, Hu J, Perreault S, Aprikian AG. Androgen deprivation therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with prostate cancer based on existence of cardiovascular risk. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(2):163–71. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.7083.
Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND, et al. The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;102(11):1531–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08183.x.
Noteboom EA, May AM, van der Wall E, de Wit NJ, Helsper CW. Patients’ preferred and perceived level of involvement in decision making for cancer treatment: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2021;30(10):1663–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5750.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Menges D, Piatti MC, Cerny T, Puhan MA. Patient preference studies for advanced prostate cancer treatment along the medical product life cycle: systematic literature review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:1539–57. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S362802.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kehl KL, Landrum MB, Arora NK, et al. Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision making in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):50–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Connor MJ, Genie MG, Burns D, et al. A systematic review of patients’ values, preferences, and expectations for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;36:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.003.
Kantar Health. Panels & Audiences. 2020. https://www.kantar.com/expertise/research-services/panels-and-audiences. Accessed 20 Nov 2023.
Hauber AB, González JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004.
Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health–a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013.
Comments (0)