A retrospective cohort study of intra-corporeal versus extra-corporeal anastomosis for right hemicolectomy with cost-effectiveness analysis

Weiss JM, Pfau PR, O’Connor ES, King J, LoConte N, Kennedy G, Smith MA (2011) Mortality by stage for right-versus left-sided colon cancer: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results–medicare data. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4401

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yahagi M, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Kitagawa Y (2016) The worse prognosis of right-sided compared with left-sided colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:648–655

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cotlar AM (2002) Historical landmarks in operations on the colon—surgeons courageous. Curr Surg 59(1):91–95

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ding J, Liao G-Q, Xia Y, Zhang Z-M, Liu S, Yan Z-S (2013) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23(1):8–16

Article  Google Scholar 

Anania G, Arezzo A, Davies RJ, Marchetti F, Zhang S, Di Saverio S, Cirocchi R, Donini A (2021) A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:1609–1620

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang H, Sun N, Fu Y, Zhao C (2021) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJS Open 5(6):133

Article  Google Scholar 

Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Takagi K, Hachiya H, Tago K, Shimizu T, Matsumoto T, Aoki T, Kubota K (2022) Postoperative complications associated with intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right colectomy. Am Surg 88(12):2831–2841

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mankotia R, Akingboye A, Peravali R (2021) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Updat Surg 73:23–33

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang T, Sun Y, Mao W (2023) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis 38(1):147

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Squillaro A, Kohn J, Weaver L, Yankovsky A, Milky G, Patel N, Kreaden U, Gaertner W (2023) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 27(11):1007–1016

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malerba V, Panaccio P, Grottola T, Cotellese R, Di Martino G, di Bartolomeo N, Raimondi P, di Sebastiano P, di Mola FF (2020) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Ital Chir 91(91):49–54

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seno E, Allaix ME, Ammirati CA, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Morino M (2023) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: cost analysis of the Torino trial. Surg Endosc 37(1):479–485

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee RA, Masic S, Bland J, Handorf E, Kutikov A, Esnaola N, Farma J, Su S, Ridge JA, Chu C (2023) Transition to value-based healthcare: development, implementation, and results of an optimal surgical care framework at a National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Eur Urol Focus 10:123

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khuri SF (2005) The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 138(5):837–843

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(2):117–122

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seow-En I, Chen WT-L (2022) Complete mesocolic excision with central venous ligation/D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer—a comprehensive review of the evidence. Surg Oncol 42:101755

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seow-En I, Khor SN, Koo CH, Wee IJY, Tan EK-W (2023) Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with new insights on technique and patient selection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 33(5):571–575

Article  Google Scholar 

Barber JA, Thompson SG (2000) Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 19(23):3219–3236

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Murray AC, Lourenco T, De Verteuil R, Hernández RA, Fraser MF, McKinley AJ, Krukowski ZH, Vale LD, Grant AM (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10:45

Article  Google Scholar 

Melich G, Jeong DH, Hur H, Baik SH, Faria J, Kim NK, Min BS (2014) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision provides acceptable perioperative outcomes but is lengthy—analysis of learning curves for a novice minimally invasive surgeon. Can J Surg 57(5):331

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Al-Taher M, Okamoto N, Mutter D, Stassen LP, Marescaux J, Diana M, Dallemagne B (2022) International survey among surgeons on laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the gap between guidelines and reality. Surg Endosc 36(8):5840–5853

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun R, Zhang Y, Feng B, Su X, Sun Y, Xu L, Lu J, Zhang G, Wu A, Kang L (2023) Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an observational cohort study. World J Surg 47(3):785–795

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Díaz-Vico T, Fernández-Hevia M, Suárez-Sánchez A, García-Gutiérrez C, Mihic-Góngora L, Fernández-Martínez D, Álvarez-Pérez JA, Otero-Díez JL, Granero-Trancón JE, García-Flórez LJ (2021) Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy versus conventional colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 28(13):8823–8837

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bambha K, Kim WR (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios: uses and pitfalls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(6):519–526

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, Kuntz KM, Meltzer DO, Owens DK, Prosser LA (2016) Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 316(10):1093–1103

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

del Campo C, Bai J, Keller LR (2019) Comparing Markov and non-Markov alternatives for cost-effectiveness analysis: insights from a cervical cancer case. Oper Res Health Care 21:32–43

Article  Google Scholar 

Lin P-J, Concannon TW, Greenberg D, Cohen JT, Rossi G, Hille J, Auerbach HR, Fang C-H, Nadler ES, Neumann PJ (2013) Does framing of cancer survival affect perceived value of care? A willingness-to-pay survey of US residents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13(4):513–522

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bertram MY, Lauer JA, De Joncheere K, Edejer T, Hutubessy R, Kieny MP, Hill SR (2016) Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Health Organ 94(12):925–930

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ibáñez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Rufete MD, Parrilla P (2019) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI). Surg Endosc 33:2850–2857

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Takahashi G, Yamada M, Uchida E (2015) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis for colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 196(1):107–112

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Dhaheri M, Ibrahim M, Al-Yahri O, Amer I, Khawar M, Al-Naimi N, Ahmed AA, Nada MA, Parvaiz A (2022) Choice of specimen’s extraction site affects wound morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(8):3561–3565

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif