Weiss JM, Pfau PR, O’Connor ES, King J, LoConte N, Kennedy G, Smith MA (2011) Mortality by stage for right-versus left-sided colon cancer: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results–medicare data. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4401
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yahagi M, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Kitagawa Y (2016) The worse prognosis of right-sided compared with left-sided colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:648–655
Cotlar AM (2002) Historical landmarks in operations on the colon—surgeons courageous. Curr Surg 59(1):91–95
Ding J, Liao G-Q, Xia Y, Zhang Z-M, Liu S, Yan Z-S (2013) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23(1):8–16
Anania G, Arezzo A, Davies RJ, Marchetti F, Zhang S, Di Saverio S, Cirocchi R, Donini A (2021) A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:1609–1620
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang H, Sun N, Fu Y, Zhao C (2021) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJS Open 5(6):133
Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Takagi K, Hachiya H, Tago K, Shimizu T, Matsumoto T, Aoki T, Kubota K (2022) Postoperative complications associated with intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right colectomy. Am Surg 88(12):2831–2841
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mankotia R, Akingboye A, Peravali R (2021) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Updat Surg 73:23–33
Zhang T, Sun Y, Mao W (2023) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis 38(1):147
Squillaro A, Kohn J, Weaver L, Yankovsky A, Milky G, Patel N, Kreaden U, Gaertner W (2023) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 27(11):1007–1016
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Malerba V, Panaccio P, Grottola T, Cotellese R, Di Martino G, di Bartolomeo N, Raimondi P, di Sebastiano P, di Mola FF (2020) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Ital Chir 91(91):49–54
Seno E, Allaix ME, Ammirati CA, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Morino M (2023) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: cost analysis of the Torino trial. Surg Endosc 37(1):479–485
Lee RA, Masic S, Bland J, Handorf E, Kutikov A, Esnaola N, Farma J, Su S, Ridge JA, Chu C (2023) Transition to value-based healthcare: development, implementation, and results of an optimal surgical care framework at a National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Eur Urol Focus 10:123
Khuri SF (2005) The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 138(5):837–843
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E (2013) Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(2):117–122
Seow-En I, Chen WT-L (2022) Complete mesocolic excision with central venous ligation/D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer—a comprehensive review of the evidence. Surg Oncol 42:101755
Seow-En I, Khor SN, Koo CH, Wee IJY, Tan EK-W (2023) Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with new insights on technique and patient selection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 33(5):571–575
Barber JA, Thompson SG (2000) Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 19(23):3219–3236
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Murray AC, Lourenco T, De Verteuil R, Hernández RA, Fraser MF, McKinley AJ, Krukowski ZH, Vale LD, Grant AM (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10:45
Melich G, Jeong DH, Hur H, Baik SH, Faria J, Kim NK, Min BS (2014) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision provides acceptable perioperative outcomes but is lengthy—analysis of learning curves for a novice minimally invasive surgeon. Can J Surg 57(5):331
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Taher M, Okamoto N, Mutter D, Stassen LP, Marescaux J, Diana M, Dallemagne B (2022) International survey among surgeons on laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the gap between guidelines and reality. Surg Endosc 36(8):5840–5853
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun R, Zhang Y, Feng B, Su X, Sun Y, Xu L, Lu J, Zhang G, Wu A, Kang L (2023) Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an observational cohort study. World J Surg 47(3):785–795
Díaz-Vico T, Fernández-Hevia M, Suárez-Sánchez A, García-Gutiérrez C, Mihic-Góngora L, Fernández-Martínez D, Álvarez-Pérez JA, Otero-Díez JL, Granero-Trancón JE, García-Flórez LJ (2021) Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy versus conventional colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 28(13):8823–8837
Bambha K, Kim WR (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios: uses and pitfalls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(6):519–526
Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, Kuntz KM, Meltzer DO, Owens DK, Prosser LA (2016) Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 316(10):1093–1103
del Campo C, Bai J, Keller LR (2019) Comparing Markov and non-Markov alternatives for cost-effectiveness analysis: insights from a cervical cancer case. Oper Res Health Care 21:32–43
Lin P-J, Concannon TW, Greenberg D, Cohen JT, Rossi G, Hille J, Auerbach HR, Fang C-H, Nadler ES, Neumann PJ (2013) Does framing of cancer survival affect perceived value of care? A willingness-to-pay survey of US residents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13(4):513–522
Bertram MY, Lauer JA, De Joncheere K, Edejer T, Hutubessy R, Kieny MP, Hill SR (2016) Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Health Organ 94(12):925–930
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ibáñez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Rufete MD, Parrilla P (2019) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI). Surg Endosc 33:2850–2857
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Takahashi G, Yamada M, Uchida E (2015) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis for colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 196(1):107–112
Al Dhaheri M, Ibrahim M, Al-Yahri O, Amer I, Khawar M, Al-Naimi N, Ahmed AA, Nada MA, Parvaiz A (2022) Choice of specimen’s extraction site affects wound morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(8):3561–3565
Comments (0)