Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34.
World Cancer Research Fund. Breast cancer statistics 2021.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Global Cancer Observatory (GCO). Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr2020.
Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85.
Li M, Chan CW, Chan D, Li X, Zhang M, Zhang H, et al. The effectiveness of WeChat couple-based psychosocial support for gynaecological cancer: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;130(6):599–609.
Dionigi F, Martinelli V, Trotti E, Ferrari A, Garcia-Etienne CA, Valle AD, et al. My Husband affects me more than my Cancer: reflections on simultaneous intimate Partner violence and breast Cancer experience in a 48-Year-old woman. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35:1041–5.
Rogers CC, Pope S, Whitfield F, Cohn WF, Valdez RS. The lived experience during the peri-diagnostic period of breast cancer: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(3):547–85.
Lopes VB, Lobo APA, Da Silva Junior GB, Melo AK, Lamboglia CG, Silva CAB. The experience of male spouses in the context of breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Psychol Health Med. 2018;23(1):89–98.
Iżycki D, Woźniak K, Iżycka N. Consequences of gynecological cancer in patients and their partners from the sexual and psychological perspective. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny. 2016;15(2):112–6.
Alinejad Mofrad S, Nasiri A, Mahmoudi Rad GH, Homaei Shandiz F. Spousal sexual life issues after gynecological cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:3857–64.
Sekse RJT, Hufthammer KO, Vika ME. Sexual activity and functioning in women treated for gynaecological cancers. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(3–4):400–10.
Bondil P, Habold D, Carnicelli D. Cancer and sexuality: the couple, a decisive factor, too often neglected. Sexologies. 2016;25(2):e29–33.
Zhou J, Chen X, Wang Z, Li Q, editors. Couple-based communication interventions for cancer patient–spousal caregiver Dyads’ Psychosocial Adaptation to Cancer: a systematic review. Healthcare: MDPI; 2023.
Li M, Chan CW, Chow KM, Xiao J, Choi KC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of couple-based intervention on sexuality and the quality of life of cancer patients and their partners. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28:1607–30.
Gao L, Liu JE, Zhou XP, Su YL, Wang PL. Supporting her as the situation changes: a qualitative study of spousal support strategies for patients with breast cancer in China. Eur J Cancer Care. 2020;29(1):e13176.
Jonsdottir JI, Vilhjalmsson R, Svavarsdottir EK. Effectiveness of a couple-based intervention on sexuality and intimacy among women in active cancer treatment: a quasi-experimental study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;52:101975.
Lee M, Kim K, Lim C, Kim JS. Posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors and their husbands based on the actor-partner interdependence model. Psycho‐Oncology. 2017;26(10):1586–92.
Fergus K, Ahmad S, Gardner S, Ianakieva I, McLeod D, Stephen J, et al. Couplelinks online intervention for young couples facing breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Psycho-oncology. 2022;31(3):512–20.
Lewis FM, Griffith KA, Alzawad Z, Dawson PL, Zahlis EH, Shands ME. Helping her heal: randomized clinical trial to enhance dyadic outcomes in couples. Psycho-oncology. 2019;28(2):430–8.
Badr H, Bakhshaie J, Chhabria K, editors. Dyadic interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers: state of the science and new directions. Seminars in oncology nursing. Elsevier; 2019.
Berthoud L, Pascual-Leone A, Caspar F, Tissot H, Keller S, Rohde KB, et al. Leaving distress behind: a randomized controlled study on change in emotional processing in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry. 2017;80(2):139–54.
Zhang L, Gu W, Zhang L, Miao R, Jing X, Zhi S, et al. The effects of a nurse-led couples intervention on marital quality of couples with gynecological cancer: a clinical randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(3):629–36.
Price-Blackshear MA, Pratscher SD, Oyler DL, Armer JM, Cheng A-L, Cheng MX, et al. Online couples mindfulness-based intervention for young breast cancer survivors and their partners: a randomized-control trial. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020;38(5):592–611.
Çömez S, Karayurt Ö. The effect of web-based training on life quality and spousal adjustment for women with breast cancer and their spouses. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;47:101758.
Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psycho‐Oncology. 2013;22(8):1688–704.
Badr H, Smith CB, Goldstein NE, Gomez JE, Redd WH. Dyadic psychosocial intervention for advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers: results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer. 2015;121(1):150–8.
Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JA. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. Cochrane Handb Syst Reviews Interventions. 2019;205:28.
Jüni P, Loke Y, Pigott T, Ramsay C, Regidor D, Rothstein H, et al. Risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I): detailed guidance. Br Med J. 2016;355:i4919.
Kirmayr M, Quilodrán C, Valente B, Loezar C, Garegnani L, Franco JVA. The GRADE approach, part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence. Medwave. 2021;21(02).
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–302.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–10.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283–93.
Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades A, Welton NJ. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):607–17.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Gremore TM, Wiesenthal N, Aldridge W, et al. A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology: J Psychol Social Behav Dimensions Cancer. 2009;18(3):276–83.
Budin WC, Hoskins CN, Haber J, Sherman DW, Maislin G, Cater JR, et al. Breast cancer: education, counseling, and adjustment among patients and partners: a randomized clinical trial. Nurs Res. 2008;57(3):199–213.
Nho J-H, Kim YH, Kook H-J. Effect of a web-based sexual health enhancement program for women with gynecologic cancer and their husbands. Int J Sex Health. 2019;31(1):50–9.
Nicolaisen A, Hagedoorn M, Hansen DG, Flyger H, Christensen R, Rottmann N, et al. The effect of an attachment-oriented couple intervention for breast cancer patients and partners in the early treatment phase: a randomised controlled trial. Psycho‐Oncology. 2018;27(3):922–8.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Reese JB, Smith KC, Handorf E, Sorice K, Bober SL, Bantug ET, et al. A randomized pilot trial of a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(2):242–63.
Hedayati M, Haji Alizadeh K, Hedayati M, Fathi E. Effectiveness of emotionally focused couples therapy on the marital intimacy of couples coping with breast cancer in women. Iran J Breast Dis. 2020;13(3):30–42.
Christensen DN. Postmastectomy couple counseling: an outcome study of a structured treatment protocol. J Sex Marital Ther. 1983;9(4):266–75.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalaitzi C, Papadopoulos VP, Michas K, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Filippou D. Combined brief psychosexual intervention after mastectomy: effects on sexuality, body image, and psychological well-being. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(3):235–40.
Wang F, Luo D, Fu L, Zhang H, Wu S, Zhang M, et al. The efficacy of couple-based interventions on health-related quality of life in cancer patients and their spouses: a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(1):39–47.
Li Q, Loke AY. A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psycho‐Oncology. 2014;23(7):731–9.
Mushtaq N, Ali R, MARITAL SATISFACTION OF BREAST CANCER PATIENTS. AND THEIR SPOUSES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Pakistan J Women’s Stud. 2019;26(2).
Hatta S, Woon LS-C, Nik Sumayyah NMN, Mohamad Nasir S. Psychosocial determinants of marital satisfaction among gynecologic cancer survivors in Malaysia. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:744922.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Çömez S, Karayurt Ö. The effect of web-based training on life quality and spousal adjustment for women with breast cancer and their spouses. Eur J Oncol Nursing: Official J Eur Oncol Nurs Soc. 2020;47:101758.
Comments (0)