INTRODUCTION 10
WHAT IS NEW AND WHAT HAS CHANGED IN THE 2023 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES? 12
1. Methodology and definition of evidence 14
1.1 Methodology of evidence grading 14
1.2 Level of evidence 14
2. PRINCIPLES OF HYPERTENSION PATHOPHYSIOLOGY 16
3. DEFINITION OF HYPERTENSION AND BP CLASSIFICATION 18
3.1 Definition of hypertension 18
3.2 Classification of hypertension 19
3.3 Prevalence of hypertension 20
3.4 BP relationship with risk of cerebral, cardiovascular and kidney events 20
3.5 Hypertension and total CV risk assessment 21
3.6 Screening versus case finding in the detection of hypertension 24
3.7 Confirming the diagnosis of hypertension 25
4. BP MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING 26
4.1 Devices for blood pressure measurement 26
4.1.1 Standard cuff-based devices 26
4.1.2 Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices 27
4.1.3 Validation of blood pressure measuring devices 27
4.2 Standard office blood pressure measurement 28
4.3 Unattended office blood pressure measurement 30
4.4 Blood pressure during exercise 32
4.5 Blood pressure measurement in hospital 32
4.6 Central blood pressure 33
4.7 Home blood pressure monitoring 34
4.8 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 36
4.9 Clinical indications for HBPM and ABPM 39
4.10 Blood pressure variability 41
5. PATIENT WORK-UP 42
5.1 Personal and medical history 42
5.2 Physical examination 44
5.3 Routine clinical chemistry investigations 45
5.4 Other investigations in hypertension 45
5.4.1 Electrocardiogram 45
5.4.2 Kidney ultrasound 46
5.4.3 Selected biomarkers and genetic markers 46
5.4.3.1 Lipoprotein (a) 46
5.4.3.2 Cardiac biomarkers 46
5.4.3.3 Kidney markers 47
5.4.3.4 Genetic markers 47
5.5 Assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage 48
5.5.1 HMOD in the heart 49
5.5.1.1 Left ventricular mass and geometry 50
5.5.1.2 Transthoracic echocardiography 50
5.5.1.3 Cardiac magnetic resonance 51
5.5.1.4 Computed tomography of the heart 52
5.5.2 HMOD in the arteries 52
5.5.2.1 Carotid artery IMT and plaques 52
5.5.2.2 Pulse wave velocity 53
5.5.2.3 Ankle–brachial index 55
5.5.3 HMOD in the kidney 55
5.5.4 HMOD in the brain 56
5.5.5 HMOD in the eye 58
5.6 Using HMOD to help stratify risk in hypertensive patients 60
5.7 When to refer a patient to a specialist or for hospital-based care 62
6. SECONDARY HYPERTENSION 63
6.1 Genetic causes of secondary hypertension 67
7. LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS 69
7.1 Relevance of lifestyle changes 69
7.2 Weight reduction 70
7.3 Restriction of sodium intake 70
7.4 Augmentation of dietary potassium intake 71
7.5 Increase levels of daily physical activity and regular exercise 72
7.6 Moderation of alcohol intake 73
7.7 Smoking cessation 74
7.8 Other dietary interventions 75
7.9 Improve stress management 75
7.10 Exposure to noise and air pollution 76
8. BENEFITS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT 77
9. ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG TREATMENT INITIATION 79
9.1 Should treatment initiation be based on total CV risk? 79
9.2 Office BP thresholds for initiation of drug treatment 79
9.3 Should BP-lowering treatment be initiated in patients with office BP <140/90 mmHg? 81
9.4 Drug treatment initiation in older people 82
10. OFFICE BP TARGETS FOR TREATMENT 85
10.1 Office BP targets in the general hypertensive population 85
10.2 Office versus home and ambulatory BP targets 87
10.3 Timing of BP control and time in therapeutic range 88
10.4 Residual risk 88
10.5 Challenges associated with evidence on BP targets 89
11. ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS AND TREATMENT 92
11.1 Blockers of the renin–angiotensin system 96
11.1.1 Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors 96
11.1.2 Angiotensin receptor blockers 96
11.1.3 Renin inhibitors 96
11.1.4 Combination of RAS inhibitors 97
11.2 Calcium channel blockers 97
11.2.1 Dihydropyridine CCBs 97
11.2.2 Nondihydropyridine CCBs 97
11.3 Diuretics 97
11.3.1 Thiazide and Thiazide-like diuretics 97
11.3.2 Loop diuretics 99
11.3.3 Potassium-sparing diuretics 99
11.4 Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 99
11.5 Beta-blockers 100
11.6 Alpha-1 blockers 102
11.7 Centrally acting drugs 103
11.8 Vasodilators 103
11.9 Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor 103
11.10 Antihypertensive drug combinations 104
11.10.1 Impact on hypertension drug treatment strategy 104
11.10.2 Drug combinations 106
11.10.3 Rationale for initial two-drug combination therapy 110
11.10.4 Up-titration of treatment to three-drug combination 112
11.10.5 Rationale for single-pill combination therapy 112
11.10.6 The quadpill concept 113
11.10.7 The polypill concept 114
11.10.8 Choice of drug combinations for initiation of treatment 115
11.10.9 Tolerability and side effects of drugs 115
11.10.10 Prescribing of antihypertensive drugs 116
11.10.10.1 Standard drug administration 116
11.10.10.2 Partial treatment reduction or complete withdrawal 117
11.10.10.3 Antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk 118
11.10.11 Concomitant medications 119
11.10.11.1 LDL-cholesterol lowering 119
11.10.11.2 Antiplatelet therapy 121
12. TRUE RESISTANT HYPERTENSION 122
12.1 Definition, prevalence, pathophysiology and cardiovascular risk 122
12.2 Diagnostic work-up 123
12.3 Optimizing lifestyle interventions and ongoing drug therapy 125
12.4 Fourth and subsequent lines of antihypertensive therapy 126
13. DEVICE-BASED TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION 131
13.1 Renal denervation 131
13.1.1 Clinical evidence of the BP-lowering effect of RDN 131
13.1.2 Off-medications studies 132
13.1.3 On-medications studies 132
13.1.4 Safety 133
13.1.5 Durability 134
13.1.6 Application 134
13.2 Carotid baroreceptor stimulation 136
13.3. Other device-based treatments 136
14. SPECIFIC HYPERTENSION PHENOTYPES 137
14.1 Sustained hypertension and true normotension 137
14.2 White-coat hypertension 138
14.3 Masked hypertension 139
14.4 White-coat uncontrolled hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension 141
14.5 Isolated systolic hypertension of the young 142
14.6 Isolated systolic hypertension in older persons 144
14.7 Isolated diastolic hypertension 146
14.8 Night-time hypertension and dipping 147
14.9 Orthostatic hypertension and hypotension 149
14.10 Baroreflex failure and efferent autonomic failure 150
15. HYPERTENSION IN DIFFERENT DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATIONS 152
15.1 Blood pressure in children, adolescents and transition period 152
15.1.1 Blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents 152
15.1.2 Hypertension in children and adolescents 153
15.1.3 Transition period to adulthood 154
15.2 Hypertension in young adults 155
15.3 Hypertension in older persons 156
15.3.1 Patients 65–79 years old 157
15.3.1.1 Threshold and target for drug treatment 157
15.3.1.2 Antihypertensive treatment strategies 158
15.3.1.3 Antihypertensive drugs 158
15.3.1.4 Monitoring the effects of treatment 159
15.3.2 Patients 80 years old or beyond 159
15.3.3 How to assess the level of frailty/functionality to better personalize therapeutic strategies 160
15.4 Sex and gender aspects in hypertension 163
15.4.1 Epidemiology and pathophysiology 163
15.4.2 Blood pressure and cardiovascular risk 164
15.4.3 Differences in clinical phenotypes 164
15.4.3.1 White-coat hypertension and masked hypertension 164
15.4.3.2 Hypertension-mediated organ damage 164
15.4.4 Sex differences in hypertension outcomes 165
15.4.5 Benefits of antihypertensive treatment and target blood pressure 166
15.4.6 Sex differences in hypertension management 167
15.4.7 Infertility treatments and hypertension in women 167
15.4.8. Oral contraceptive pills and hypertension 168
15.4.9 Hormone-replacement therapy and hypertension 169
15.4.10 Gender-affirming hormone therapy and hypertension 169
15.5 Hypertension and ethnicity 169
15.5.1 Nomenclature and relevance 169
15.5.2 Management 170
16. HYPERTENSION IN SPECIFIC SETTINGS 171
16.1 Hypertension disorders in pregnancy 171
16.1.1 Definition and classification of hypertension in pregnancy 173
16.1.2 Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy 174
16.1.3 Laboratory examinations in pregnancy 175
16.1.4 Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia 175
16.1.5 Lifestyle interventions 176
16.1.6 Clinical management of hypertension in pregnancy 176
16.1.6.1 Mild preexisting essential hypertension 176
16.1.6.2 Mild gestational hypertension 177
16.1.6.3 Preeclampsia 178
16.1.6.4 Severe hypertension 178
16.1.6.5 Preexisting secondary hypertension 179
16.1.7 Blood pressure during puerperium 180
16.1.8 Postpartum hypertension and breastfeeding 181
16.1.9 Risk of recurrence of hypertensive disorders in a subsequent pregnancy 181
16.1.10 Long-term cardiovascular consequences of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy 181
16.2 Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies 183
16.2.1 Definitions of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies 183
16.2.2 Hospital work-up, treatments and follow-up 185
16.2.3 Blood pressure in the emergency department 189
16.3 Perioperative hypertension and its management 190
17. HYPERTENSION IN ESTABLISHED CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS 192
17.1 Coronary artery disease 192
17.1.2 Treatment of hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease 193
17.2 Heart failure 195
17.2.1 Prevention of heart failure in hypertension 195
17.2.2 Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction 197
17.2.3 Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 199
17.2.4 Overall management of heart failure and classification 200
17.3 Hypertension and atrial fibrillation 201
17.3.1 Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation 201
17.3.2 Detection of atrial fibrillation 202
17.3.3 Prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation in hypertension 202
17.3.4 Oral anticoagulation and BP control 204
17.4 Valvular heart disease 206
17.4.1 Aortic stenosis 206
17.4.2 Aortic regurgitation 207
17.4.3 Mitral regurgitation 207
17.5 Cerebrovascular disease and cognition 208
17.5.1 Management of elevated BP in acute stroke 208
17.5.1.1 Acute hemorrhagic stroke 208
17.5.1.2 Acute ischemic stroke 209
17.5.2 Management of elevated BP in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack 210
17.5.3 Management of patients with cognitive dysfunction and dementia 211
17.6 Vascular disease 213
17.6.1 Lower extremity arterial disease 213
17.6.2 Aortic dilatation, aneurysm and dissection 214
18. HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES MELLITUS 215
18.1. Epidemiology and risk classification 215
18.2 Benefits of BP-lowering 216
18.3 Antihypertensive drug treatment 217
19. HYPERTENSION AND THE KIDNEY 219
19.1 Treatment of hypertension in CKD 219
19.1.1 Treatment BP targets 220
19.1.2 Antihypertensive drug treatment 222
19.1.3 Special therapeutic challenges 223
19.1.4 Use of additional drugs for cardiovascular and nephroprotection in CKD 224
19.2 Renovascular disease 227
19.3 Hypertension in patients with kidney transplantation 228
20. HYPERTENSION AND OTHER SELECTED COMORBIDITIES 231
20.1 Obesity 231
20.1.1 Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in obesity 231
20.1.2 Role of nonpharmacological weight loss intervention 232
20.1.3 Role of weight loss medications 233
20.1.4 Role of bariatric surgery 234
20.2 Obstructive sleep apnea 235
20.3 Asthma 236
20.4 Obstructive pulmonary disease 237
20.5 Gout and uric acid 238
20.6 Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases 238
20.6.1 Rheumatoid arthritis 239
20.6.2 Psoriasic arthritis 239
20.6.3 Systemic lupus erythematosus 240
20.7 Glaucoma in hypertension 240
20.8 Hypertension oncology 242
20.8.1 Hypertension and its association with cancer 242
20.8.2 Hypertension induced by cancer treatments 243
20.8.2.1 Hypertension induced by VEGF inhibitors 243
20.8.2.2 Hypertension induced by other anticancer drugs 244
20.8.2.3 Hypertension induced by adjunctive therapies, radiotherapy or surgery 245
20.8.3 Management of hypertension in cancer patients 245
20.8.3.1 BP monitoring and general management before start of cancer treatment 245
20.8.3.2 General BP-lowering therapy and management during cancer therapy 247
20.8.3.3 Treatment of hypertension induced by VEGF inhbitors 248
20.8.4 Follow-up and management of hypertension in cancer survivors 250
20.9 COVID-19 and hypertension 250
20.9.1 COVID-19 and RAS inhibitors 251
20.9.2 COVID-19 lockdown and hypertension management 252
20.9.3 Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and hypertension 252
20.9.4 Long COVID-19 and hypertension 253
21. FOLLOW-UP 253
21.1 Importance of follow-up 253
21.2 Adherence 255
21.2.1 Definitions 255
21.2.2 Prevalence of nonadherence and associated burden 255
21.2.3 Methods to detect nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment 256
21.2.4 Etiology of nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment 257
21.2.5 When and how to screen for nonadherence 257
21.2.6 Management of nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment 258
21.3 Clinical inertia 259
21.4 Patient empowerment 261
21.5 Follow-up of low-risk hypertensive patients and deprescribing 262
21.6 Use of telemedicine and tele-health technologies 262
21.7 Challenges of long-term follow-up 263
21.8 Role of general physician, pharmacies and team-based care 263
21.9 Hypertension clinics 265
21.10 Health risks at workplace 265
21.11 Patient organizations 266
22. GAPS IN EVIDENCE AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES 268
23. REFERENCES 270
INTRODUCTIONThe year 2023 marks the 20th anniversary of the hypertension guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), which were published for the first time in 2003, following a proposal by Professor Alberto Zanchetti (Fig. 1). Professor Zanchetti thought that it was time for Europe to express its view on diagnostic and treatment aspects of this crucially important medical condition rather than referring, as in the past, to guidelines issued by the WHO, with or without the ISH or the scientific societies in the USA. He played a fundamental role in these first guidelines [1] as coordinator of the Writing Committee appointed by the ESH, and this was rewarded by an unexpected large success, which made these guidelines the fifth most widely quoted paper in the world across all research areas and the most quoted in the medical area. ESH offered to share these hypertension guidelines with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), which accepted after the manuscript had already been completed, without sharing its publication in the ESC Society Journal. Subsequently, the ESH and the ESC enjoyed an equal collaboration, resulting in three further successful and also widely quoted guidelines in 2007 [2], 2013 [3] and 2018 [4] that were published in the official journals of the two Societies, except for a 2009 reappraisal of the 2007 guidelines, which was prompted by new evidence in the hypertension area and prepared only by the ESH [5].
FIGURE 1:Alberto Zanchetti.
These 2023 hypertension guidelines have also been prepared only by the ESH because the ESC did not want to continue the previous understanding with ESH to generate “Joint Guidelines” with the equalparticipation of ESH and ESC. The rules of these guidelines, however, are largely, although not entirely, the same as those that were followed in the previous guidelines. That is, in the 2023 guidelines: (i) the members of the Task Force have been appointed by the ESH, based on recognized scientific and clinical expertise in one or more areas covered by the guidelines as well as on the documented absence of relevant conflicts of interest; (ii) selected members were initially asked to write a section or sections of the guidelines related to her or his main scientific expertise, and a small Steering Committee was appointed to harmonize the material received; (iii) multiple revisions of the text were made by back and forth interactions between the Task Force members, with a final collective critical review of the text and (iv) the final manuscript has been sent to external reviewers and further revised according to their suggestions and criticism. Particular attention has been given to the scoring of the strength of the diagnostic and treatment recommendations, which have been graded according to criteria partly different from those used in previous guidelines, i.e. with consideration for the study design but also for the quality of the collected data (see Section 1). Because of the questionable scientific value of voting, disagreements on treatment recommendations have not been resolved that way but by consensus on a shared text. Conflicting evidence or interpretation of the data have been openly admitted.
The similarity of the present and past guidelines extends to the scientific principles on which the guidelines have been based. The 2023 guidelines have been developed after careful search for new studies in the hypertension and related areas. Furthermore, as in the past, RCTs have been assigned a top value while also mentioning their limits when appropriate. However, all other relevant sources of knowledge (from observational studies down to clinical cases) have been considered, and even mechanistic studies have not been ignored, given their relevance for diagnostic and treatment decisions in individual patients. Particular attention has been given to real-world studies, which play a growing role in hypertension research and provide knowledge in areas that cannot be addressed by RCTs. Like the previous guidelines, the 2023 guidelines (i) regard their value as educational, which explains why the text addresses the data justifying the recommendations and (ii) emphasize that their recommendations are not invariably prescriptive for individual patients because they are based on average data and address conditions or diseases in general. In individual patients, the most appropriate diagnostic and treatment decisions may differ from those expressed by the guidelines.
The 2023 guidelines (i) contain several conceptual elements of novelty originated by research performed after the 2018 guidelines; (ii) deal more in depth with topics that were only briefly considered in the past and (iii) extend to several conditions that were previously unaddressed by guidelines, although frequently coexisting with hypertension and leading to specific needs for medical management. Although mainly referring to hypertension in adults, they include for the first time essential recommendations on hypertension in children, adolescents and the transition to young hypertensive adult individuals; and (iv) include a detailed index of sections and subsections focused on specific issues that has been prepared to facilitate reading of these various and multiple aspects. Furthermore, while the text addresses the sometimes nonunivocal evidence provided by research on a given issue, each section offers, as is now usual for many guidelines, a simple final list of key statements and recommendations that translate research achievements into practical use. We hope that this structure will make the ESH guidelines useful not only to the practicing physicians but also to hypertension experts and investigators.
WHAT IS NEW AND WHAT HAS CHANGED IN THE 2023 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES? 1. Modified and simplified criteria for evidence grading recommendations 2. Pathophysiological background of primary hypertension 3. Clinical BP measurements by different methods and in different settings and clinical conditions 4. Thorough description of office, ambulatory and home BP measurements and value in different demographic and clinical conditions 5. Upgrading of out-of-office BP measurements in hypertension management 6. New HMOD measurements and their clinical value in hypertension work-up 7. New CV risk factors and update on CV risk assessment 8. Update and comprehensive summary of secondary forms of hypertension 9. Update on lifestyle interventions 10. Update on threshold and targets for antihypertensive drug treatment, including their possible heterogeneity in demographic and clinical subgroups of patients 11. Confirmation of preferred use of RAS blockers, CCBs and Thiazide/Thiazide-like diuretics, and their various combinations for BP-lowering treatment. Inclusion of BBs among the major antihypertensive drugs 12. Update on available combination-based drug treatment strategies, including the quadpill and the polypill 13. Emphasis and update on the diagnosis and management of true resistant hypertension 14. Update on use and position of renal denervation for antihypertensive treatment 15. Impact of hypertension and its treatment on cognitive dysfunction and dementia 16. Management of hypertension in older people according to the frailty and functional level 17. Update on treatment of hypertension in HFrEF and HFpEF 18. New diagnostic approaches to diagnosis and treatment in hypertensive patients with AF 19. Update on treatment in CKD, including kidney transplantation 20. Update and novel treatment approaches to patients with type 2 diabetes 21. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment in different BP phenotypes 22. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of hypertension in demographic and clinical conditions not or only marginally addressed in previous guidelines: a. Children/adolescents and transition to adulthood b. Young patients c. Sex-related differences d. Pregnancy and puerperium e. Peripheral artery disease f. Aortic aneurism g. Valvular heart disease h. Treatment of hypertension in acute cerebrovascular diseases i. Hypertensive emergencies/urgencies j. Perioperative hypertension k. Obesity l. COVID-19 m. Chronic inflammatory diseases n. Hypertension in oncology o. Baroreflex failure and dysautonomia p. Glaucoma 23. Detailed recommendations on patients’ follow-up strategies, including assessment and minimization of nonadher-ence and clinical inertia. 24. Mention of new potential approaches to the treatment of hypertension and containment of hypertension-related workload (tele-health, team-based treatment, role of pharmacists) 1. METHODOLOGY AND DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE 1.1 Methodology of evidence gradingThe 2023 ESH guidelines aim to summarize the best available evidence for all aspects of hypertension management. The guidelines were developed by a Task Force of 59 experts form European countries, representing the areas of internal medicine, cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology, general medicine, geriatrics, pharmacology and epidemiology. Each topic was assigned to a small group of Task Force members responsible for reviewing and summarizing the available evidence within that topic. The ‘class of recommendation’ (CoR) and ‘level of evidence’ (LoE) for all recommendations were reviewed by an Evidence Grading Committee to make sure that they complied with the predefined criteria outlined in the following. Draft versions were reviewed by the Steering Committee, Task Force members and external reviewers. The final version was approved by all Task Force members.
In accordance with previous versions of the ESH guidelines, a similar system separating CoR and LoE was applied [3,4]. CoR indicates how strong a recommendation is, considering the assumed benefit versus risks and costs on a scale from I to III. Recommendation classes I and III each convey a clear message, namely a general consensus that a measure is either useful (CoR I) or not useful or even harmful (CoR III). If there is no general consensus or only doubtful evidence, an optional recommendation is conveyed with CoR II. In contrast to previous guidelines [3,4], the Task Force finds that a further subdivision of the CoR II into two subclasses (IIa and IIb) adds little value and, for the sake of simplification is no longer used. The LoE indicates how reliable the evidence underlying each recommendation is on a scale from A to C (Fig. 2). Importantly, the CoR and LoE are independent of each other, e.g. strong recommendations may build on weak evidence if the assumed benefit of an intervention or a diagnostic procedure greatly outweighs the potential risks.
FIGURE 2:Class of recommendation (CoR) and level of evidence (LoE). BP, blood pressure, CVD, cardiovascular disease, HMOD, hypertension mediated organ damage, RCT, randomized controlled trial. aLimitations affecting the level of evidence include (but may not be limited to) high risk of bias, inability to account for important confounding factors in observational studies, questionable external validity and uncertain effect estimates (confidence intervals including negligible effect).
1.2 Level of evidenceThe 2023 ESH guidelines employ the same terminology as in the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines but with updated criteria for assessing the LoE. This revision was influenced primarily by the recommendations from the GRADE working group [6,7], but also by the most recent evidence definition used by the AHA/ACC [7].
The most important difference compared with the previous guidelines is the priority given to patient-important CV outcomes, such as stroke, MI, HF, ESKD and CV or total mortality, acknowledging that the primary aim of antihypertensive treatment is to reduce the risk of clinical outcomes and not only BP. Although BP reduction is strongly associated with a reduction in clinical events, interventions affecting BP may also affect other physiological systems with beneficial or harmful effects, and the benefit/harm ratio cannot be firmly established without clinical outcome trials.
Furthermore, risk of bias and statistical precision were considered when assigning the LoE. This means that recom-mendations supported by well conducted RCTs with CV outcomes were assigned LoE A, whereas recommendations supported by trials with a similar design and with similar outcomes, were downgraded to LoE B or C if the risk of bias was judged as high, or if effect estimates were imprecise. Meta-analyses may contribute to any level of evidence depending on the type of studies included and the quality of the meta-analysis itself [8].
For diagnostic tests and procedures, we have adopted the strategy recommended by the GRADE working group, assessing the evidence for benefit on patient-important outcomes [9]. Many diagnostic procedures rely on studies of accuracy rather than effect on outcomes, and recommendations building on such evidence is generally downgraded for indirectness even if the studies themselves are without important limitations.
2. PRINCIPLES OF HYPERTENSION PATHOPHYSIOLOGYHypertension is divided into a primary (formerly and still also currently referred to as ‘essential’) and secondary forms. Secondary hypertension originates from specific causes and can be detected in only a small fraction of hypertensive patients (see Section 6). Primary hypertension covers the remaining large fraction of the hypertensive population, and its origin depends on the complex interaction between a genetic background, a large number of environmental factors [10–12] and the aging process. Both genetic and environmental factors operate through alterations of CV regulatory systems, leading to an increase of systemic vascular resistance, which is the hallmark hemodynamic abnormality responsible for BP elevation in almost all hypertensive patients [13]. In the last few years, important new evidence has been obtained on the genetic background of hypertension, with more than 1000 genetic factors being identified [11,12] together with, in some instances, the biochemical and pathophysiological paths they work through [14]. New environmental factors (e.g. air pollution and noise) have been added to those already documented by older research [15–17]. Furthermore, new experimental and clinical studies have confirmed that alterations of several major CV control systems may contribute to chronic BP elevation. As shown in Fig. 3, primary hypertension may be accompanied by alterations of the RAAS, central and peripheral autonomic cardiac and vascular regulation, the endothelin system and other systems controlling vascular function, including nitric oxide and natriuretic peptides [13,18–22]. More recently, pressogenic effects (increased sodium sensitivity) of gut microbial dysbiosis have also been reported [23,24]. In addition, the immune system is likely to play a pathophysiologic role, with effects that are possibly primarily mediated by inflammation, and involve not only BP regulation (and thus development of hypertension) but also the initiation and progression of HMOD [25,26]. There is extensive experimental and clinical evidence that hypertension is associated with inflammation and immune cell activation, two processes that are driven in large part by oxidative stress. Immune cell activation is characterized by excessive production of reactive oxygen species and an altered oxidation– reduction (redox) state [26], and there is evidence that generation of reactive oxygen species is influenced by factors involved in BP regulation, such as Ang II, endothelin-1 (ET-1), aldosterone and salt (sodium) [26]. Furthermore, evidence is also available that alterations of immunoinflammation is promoted by the above-mentioned hypertension promoters such as genetic susceptibility, neurohumoral activation, salt influences and gut microbiome [10–13,18–22,27]. Although this complex interplay makes it impossible to know whether inflammation is causatively related to hypertension or represents a secondary effect of a chronic BP elevation, it is clear that inflammation and the dysregulated immune system are closely linked to each other and that immunoinflammation is involved in hypertension [25,26]. Indeed, the suggestion has been made that oxidative stress and increased generation of reactive oxygen species represent the common molecular basis linking immunoinflam-mation to hypertension. Alterations in metabolomic pathways, e.g. glucose and lipid metabolism, may also contribute, as exemplified by the sympathostimulating effect of insulin [13,28] and the favoring effect of sympathostimulation on insulin resistance [29]. Regardless of the mechanisms involved, a chronic BP elevation is known to modify the cardiac (e.g. LVH), large artery (increase in collagen and stiffening of the arterial wall) and small artery (increase in wall-to-lumen ratio) structure, which in a later hypertension phase promote the BP increase on a nonspecific anatomical basis [13]. This confirms and expands the former mosaic theory on the pathogenesis of primary hypertension as a multifactorial phenotype, which was already formulated by Page [30] in the pioneer phase of hypertension research more than 70 years ago. To the original theory, modern research has added not only new mechanisms but also, as shown in Fig. 3, strong evidence for the existence of reciprocal influences between different CV control systems, as a result of which alteration of one system may favor or reinforce alterations of the other systems and vice versa [31]. At a practical level, this multimechanistic interactive pathophysiology implies that diagnostic attempts to identify a single responsible mechanism for primary hypertension can often be not only methodologi-cally difficult but also futile. It also explains why an elevated BP can be lowered by drugs with different mechanisms of action as well as why a combination of mechanistically different drugs lowers BP much more effectively than monotherapy.
FIGURE 3:Mechanisms involved in BP regulation and the pathophysiology of hypertension.
3. DEFINITION OF HYPERTENSION AND BP CLASSIFICATION 3.1 Definition of hypertensionAccording to the previous 2018 European and current international guidelines [32–34], hypertension is defined based on repeated office SBP values 140 mmHg and/or DBP 90 mmHg. However, there is a continuous relationship between BP and CV or renal morbid or fatal events starting from an office SBP >115 mmHg and a DBP >75 mmHg [35]. Therefore, this definition is arbitrary and has mainly the pragmatic purpose of simplifying the diagnosis and decision on hypertension management. In this context, the above office threshold BP values correspond to the level of BP at which the benefits of intervention (lifestyle interventions or drug treatment) exceed those of inaction, as shown by outcome-based RCTs. Based on available evidence [36] the definition of hypertension remains unchanged from the previous guidelines [4].
3.2 Classification of hypertensionThe classification of office BP and definition of hypertension grades also remain the same from previous guidelines (Table 1).
TABLE 1 - Classification of office BP and definitions of hypertension grades Category Systolic (mmHg) Diastolic (mmHg) Optimal <120 and <80 Normal 120–129 and 80–84 High-normal 130–139 and/or 85–89 Grade 1 hypertension 140–159 and/or 90–99 Grade 2 hypertension 160–179 and/or 100–109 Grade 3 hypertension ≥180 and/or ≥110 Isolated systolic hypertensiona ≥140 and <90 Isolated diastolic hypertensiona <140
Comments (0)