1. Siegelman, ES, Outwater, EK, Banner, MP, et al. High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1183–1203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Ozsarlak, O, Tjalma, W, Schepens, E, et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2338–2345.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Young, P, Daniel, B, Sommer, G, et al. Intravaginal gel for staging of female pelvic cancers: preliminary report of safety, distention, and gel-mucosal contrast during magnetic resonance examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012; 36: 253–256.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Del Frate, C, Girometti, R, Pittino, M, et al. Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1705–1718.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Bis, KG, Vrachliotis, TG, Agrawal, R, et al. Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging spectrum with laparoscopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 1997; 17: 639–655.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Cohen, WN, Seidelmann, FE, Bryan, PJ. Use of a tampon to enhance vaginal localization in computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1977; 128: 1064–1065.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Kala, D, Naik, NG, Agarwal, A. Our experience in the management of vaginal agenesis: its psychosocial impact and role of contrast magnetic resonance imaging scan with vaginal mold in the interpretation of high transverse vaginal septum. J Hum Reprod Sci 2019; 12: 67–71.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Barnhart, KT, Pretorius, ES, Timbers, K, et al. In vivo distribution of a vaginal gel: MRI evaluation of the effects of gel volume, time and simulated intercourse. Contraception 2004; 70: 498–505.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Brown, MA, Mattrey, RF, Stamato, S, et al. MRI of the female pelvis using vaginal gel. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1221–1227.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Akata, D, Kerimoglu, U, Hazirolan, T, et al. Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1727–1733.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Hahn, WY, Israel, GM, Lee, VS. MRI of female urethral and periurethral disorders. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 677–682.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Okamoto, Y, Tanaka, YO, Nishida, M, et al. Pelvic imaging: multicystic uterine cervical lesions: can magnetic resonance imaging differentiate benignancy from malignancy? Acta Radiol 2004; 45(1): 102–108.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals13. Loubeyre, P, Petignat, P, Jacob, S, et al. Anatomic distribution of posterior deeply infiltrating endometriosis on MRI after vaginal and rectal gel opacification. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1625–1631.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Gürses, C, Mulayim, B, Çağlar, M. The rectal vaginal opacification with water and the anti-peristaltic agent in magnetic resonance scanning of the intestinal endometriosis. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 16: 208–212.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Fiaschetti, V, Crusco, S, Meschini, A, et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: evaluation of retro-cervical space on MRI after vaginal opacification. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3638–3645.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Kikuchi, I, Kuwatsuru, R, Yamazaki, K, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of the MRI jelly method for diagnosing complete cul-de-sac obliteration. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 437962.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Sala, E, Wakely, S, Senior, E, et al. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1577–1587.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Atcı, N, Özgür, T, Öztürk, F, et al. Utility of intravaginal ultrasound gel for local staging of cervical carcinoma on MRI. Clin Imaging 2016; 40: 1104–1107.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Bazot, M, Bharwani, N, Huchon, C, et al. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2765–2775.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Chassang, M, Novellas, S, Bloch-Marcotte, C, et al. Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 2010; 20(4): 1003–1010.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Uyttenhove, F, Langlois, C, Collinet, P, et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: should rectal and vaginal opacification be systematically used in MR imaging? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2016; 44(6): 322–328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Unlu, E, Virarkar, M, Rao, S, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of the vaginal contrast media in magnetic resonance imaging for detection of Pelvic pathologies: a meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2020; 44(3): 436–442.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline