Management of treatment-related sexual complications in cancer care: evidence for erectile function recovery and penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer survivorship.

Expert Rev Qual of Life Cancer Care. 2: 279-286Feng D Liu S Yang Y et al.

Generating comprehensive comparative evidence on various interventions for penile rehabilitation in patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Transl Androl Urol. 10: 109-124Liu C Lopez DS Chen M et al.

Penile rehabilitation therapy following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

J Sex Med. 14: 1496-1503Salonia A Adaikan G Buvat J et al.

Sexual rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer- Part 1: recommendations from the fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015).

J Sex Med. 14: 285-296Levine LA Becher E Bella A et al.

Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine.

J Sex Med. 13: 489-518Hatzimouratidis K Salonia A Adaikan G et al.

Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction: recommendations from the fourth international consultation for sexual medicine (ICSM 2015).

J Sex Med. 13: 465-488Philippou YA Jung JH Steggall MJ et al.

Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10: CD012414

Translating penile erectile hydraulics to clinical application in inflatable penile prosthesis implant.

Curr Sex Health Rep. 9: 84-89

Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Transl Androl Urol. 6: 37-45Scherzer NK Dick B Gabrielson AT et al.

Penile prosthesis complications: planning, prevention, and decision making.

Sex Med Rev. 7: 349-359Narang GL Figler BD Coward RM

Preoperative counselling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Transl Androl Urol. 6: S869-S880Segal RL Camper SB Burnett AL

Modern utilization of penile prosthesis surgery: a national claim registry analysis.

Int J Impot Res. 26: 167-171Trost L Wanzek P Bailey G

A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Nat Rev Urol. 13: 33-46Salonia A Adaikan G Buvat J et al.

Sexual rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer- Part 2: recommendations from the fourth international consultation on sexual medicine (ICSM 2015).

J Sex Med. 14: 297-315

Sexual rehabilitation and cancer survivorship: a state of art review of current literature and management strategies in male sexual dysfunction among prostate cancer survivors.

J Sex Med. 10: 102-111Crawford-Williams F March S Goodwin BC et al.

Interventions for prostate cancer survivorship: a systematic review of reviews.

Psychooncology. 27: 2339-2348

Informed consent for penile prosthesis surgery.

Transl Androl Url. 6 ()Sunaryo PL Colaco M Terlecki R

Penile prostheses and litigious patient: a legal database review.

J Sex Med. 11: 2589-2594

The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) information on penile prosthesis. Available at: https://www.baus.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/Patients/Leaflets/Penile%20prostheses.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2021.

The Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) information form. Available at: https://www.smsna.org/V1/images/SMSNAIPP_policy.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2021.

A review of factors affecting patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis.

Sex Med Rev. 9: 350-357Trost LW Baum N Hellstrom WJG

Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient.

J Sex Med. 10: 893-907

Penile prosthesis infection: myths and realities.

World J Mens Health. 37: 276-287

Best practices for infection prevention in penile prosthesis surgery.

Curr Opin Urol. 30: 302-308

Penile prosthesis implant in the special populations: diabetics, neurogenic conditions, fibrotic cases, concurrent urinary incontinence, and salvage implants.

Asian J Androl. 22: 39-44Meuleman EJ Hatzichristou D Rosen RC et al.

Diagnostic tests for male erectile dysfunction revisited. Committee consensus report of the international consultation in sexual medicine.

J Sex Med. 7: 2375-2381

Evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus.

Mayo Clin Proc. 77: 276-282Christodoulidou M Pearce I

Infection of penile prostheses in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 17: 2-8Dick BP Yousif A Raheem O hellstrom WJG

Does lowering the haemoglobin A1c reduce penile prosthesis infection: A systematic review.

Sex Med Rev. S2050-0521(20) (): 30068Habous M Tal R Tealab A et al.

Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection.

BJU Int. 121: 293-300Canguven O Talib R El Ansari W et al.

Is HbA1c level of diabetic patients associated with penile prosthesis implantation infections?.

Aging Male. : 1-6Lipsky MJ Onyeji I Golan R et al.

Diabetes is a risk factor for inflatable penile prosthesis infection: analysis of a large statewide database.

Sex Med. 7: 35-40Pearson-Stuttard J Blundell S Harris T et al.

Diabetes and infection: assessing the association with glycemic control in population-based studies.

Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4: 148-158Huynh LM Huang E El-Khatib FM et al.

A systematic review of literature regarding whether immediate preoperative haemoglobin A1c or serum glucose are risk factors for infection following penile prosthesis implantation.

Urology. 152: 15-24Gon LM de Campos CCC Voris BRI et al.

A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role.

BMC Urol. 21: 35Thiruvenkatarajan V Meyer EJ Nanjappa V et al.

Perioperative diabetic ketoacidosis associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: a systematic review.

Br J Anaesth. 123: 27-36Violette PD Cartwright R Briel M et al.

Guideline of guidelines: thomboprophylaxis for urological surgery.

BJU Int. 118: 351-358

Penile prosthesis infections- A review of risk factors, prevention, and treatment.

Sex Med Rev. 4: 389-398Carvajal A Benavides J Garcia-Perdomo HA et al.

Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Impot Res. 32: 587-597

Infection prevention strategies prior to penile implant surgery.

Eur Urol Focus. 4: 317-320Gross MS Phillips EA Carrasquillo RJ et al.

Multicenter investigation of the micro-organisms involved in penile prosthesis infection: an analysis of the efficacy of the AUA and EAU guidelines for penile prosthesis prophylaxis.

J Sex Med. 14: 455-463Wolf Jr, JS Bennett CJ Dmochowski RR et al.

Urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis best practice policy panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

J Urol. 179: 1379-1390Palmisano F Boeri L Cristini C et al.

Comparison of infrapubic vs penoscrotal approaches for 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement: do we have a winner?.

Sex Med Rev. 6: 631-639Trost LW Boonjindasup AG Hellstrom WJ

Comparison of infrapubic versus transscrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report.

Int J Impot Res. 27: 86-89Chung E Ralph D Kadioglu A et al.

Evidence-based management guidelines on peyronie’s disease.

J Sex Med. 13: 905-923

Critical appraisal and review of management strategies for severe fibrosis during penile implant surgery.

J Sex Med. 12: 439-447Mulhall J Ahmed A Anderson M

Penile prosthetic surgery for peyronie's disease: defining the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers.

J Sex Med. 1: 318-321

Inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in men with severe intracorporal fibrosis.

Curr Urol. 10: 92-96

Corporoscopic excavation of the fibrosed corpora cavernosa for penile prosthesis implantation: optical corporotomy and trans-corporeal resection, Shaeer's technique.

J Sex Med. 4: 218-225Montague DK Angermeier KW

Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis.

Urology. 67: 1072-1075Mulcahy JJ Tatem A Wen L et al.

The last survivor of unitary and two-piece inflatables- the Ambicor. Does it still have a role in today’s implant marketplace?.

Int J Impot Res. Simon DP Alter K Bajic P et al.

Device profile of the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis for treatment of erectile dysfunction: overview of its safety and efficacy.

Expert Rev Med Dev. 18: 9-14

Review of penile prosthetic reservoir: complications and presentation of a modified reservoir placement technique.

J Sex Med. 9: 2759-2767

Traditional (retroperitoneal) and abdominal wall (ectopic) reservoir placement.

J Sex Med. 8: 656-659Van Dyke M Baumgarten AS Ortiz N et al.

State of reservoir: current concepts of penile implant reservoir placement and potential complications.

Curr Urol Rep. 22: 20Baumgarten AS Kavoussi M Ortiz NM et al.

High submuscular IPP reservoir placement: the “five-step” technique.

Urology. 145: 298Baumgarten AS Kavoussi M VanDyke ME et al.

Avoiding deep pelvic complications using a “Five-Step” technique for high submuscular placement of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoirs.

BJU Int. 126: 457-463Ziegelman MJ Viers BR Lomas DJ et al.

Ectopic penile prosthesis reservoir placement: an anatomic cadaveric model of the high submuscular technique.

J Sex Med. 13: 1425-1431Levine LA Estrada CR Morgentaler A

Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with, the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.

J Urol. 166: 932Falcone M Pucci L Garaffa G et al.

An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study.

Int J Impot Res. 32: 126-132Howell S Palasi S Green T et al.

Comparison of satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation in patients with radical prostatectomy or radical cystoprostatectomy to the general population.

Sex Med. 9100300Loh-Doyle J Patil MB Sawkar H et al.

3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: technique and outcomes.

J Sex Med. 15: 907-913Dubocq FM Bianco Jr, FJ Maralani SJ et al.

Outcome analysis of penile implant surgery after external beam radiation for prostate cancer.

J Urol. 158: 1787-1790Parekh A Chen MH Hoffman KE et al.

Reduced penile size and treatment regret in men with recurrent prostate cancer after surgery, radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation, or radiotherapy alone.

Urology. 81: 130-134Rogers MJ Ramirez-Fort ML Kashanian JA et al.

Prostatic irradiation-induced sexual dysfunction: a review and multidisciplinary guide to management in the radical radiotherapy era (Part II on urological management).

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 25: 619-624Gaither TW Awad MA Osterberg EC et al.

The natural history of erectile dysfunction after prostatic radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Sex Med. 14: 1071-1078Dave CN Kohn TP Patel HD et al.

Inflatable penile prosthesis outcomes after pelvic radiation.

Can J Urol. 27: 10382-10387

The effects of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on penile length in patients with prostate cancer: a single-centre, prospective, open-label observation study.

J Sex Med. 8: 3214-3219Barker HE Paget JT Khan AA et al.

The tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of resistance and recurrence.

Nat Rev Cancer. 15: 409-425Kang DH Weaver MT Park NJ et al.

Significant impairment in immune recovery following cancer treatment.

Nurs Res. 58: 105-114Wargo JA Reuben A Cooper ZA et al.

Immune effects of chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapy and opportunities for combination with immunotherapy.

Semin Oncol. 42: 601-616

Infections in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: aetiology, prevention, and treatment.

Lancet Oncol. 4: 595-604

Penile reconstructive surgery in Peyronie's disease: challenges in restoring normal penis size, shape and function.

World J Mens Health. 36: e10-e17Chung E Solomon M De Young L et al.

Comparison between AMS 700 CX and coloplast titan inflatable penile prosthesis for peyronie's disease treatment and remodelling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

J Sex Med. 10: 2855-2860Chung E Wang R Ralph D et al.

A worldwide survey on Peyronie's disease surgical practice patterns among surgeons.

J Sex Med. 15: 568-575

Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the special populations: neurological, revision, concurrent penile prosthesis and female stress urinary incontinence groups.

Asian J Androl. 22: 45-50Rolle L Ceruti C Sedigh O et al.

Surgical implantation of artificial urinary device and penile prosthesis through trans-scrotal incision for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction: synchronous or delayed procedure?.

Urology. 80: 1046-1050Kendirci M Gupta S Shaw K et al.

Synchronous prosthetic implantation through a stransscrotal incision: an outcome analysis.

J Urol. 175: 2218-2222Gorbatiy V Westney OL Romero C et al.

Outcomes of simultaneous placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis and a male urethral sling through a single perineal incision.

J Sex Med. 7: 832-838Falcone M Preto M Ammirati E et al.

Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study.

Int J Impot Res. Mancini JG Kizer WS Jones LA et al.

Patient satisfaction after dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prostheses.

Urology. 71: 893-896Segal RL Cabrini MR Harris ED et al.

Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.

J Urol. 190: 2183-2188Patel N Golan R Halpem JA et al.

A contemporary analysis of dual inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.

J Urol. 201: 141-146