Relative motion flexion splinting for the rehabilitation of flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review

1. Boyer, MI, Strickland, JW, Engles, DR, et al. Flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation: state of the art in 2002. J Bone Jt Surg 2002; 84: 1684–1706.
Google Scholar | Crossref2. Ishak, A, Rajangam, A, Khajuria, A. The evidence-base for the management of flexor tendon injuries of the hand: review. Ann Med Surg 2019; 48: 1–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Starr, HM, Snoddy, M, Hammond, KE, et al. Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 1712–1717.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Chesney, A, Chauhan, A, Kattan, A, et al. Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 1583–1592.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Woythal, L, Hølmer, P, Brorson, S. Splints with or without wrist immobilization, following surgical repair of flexor tendon lesions of the hand: a systematic review. Hand Surg Rehabil 2019; 38: 217–222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Neiduski, RL, Powell, RK. Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2019; 32: 165–174.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Peters, SE, Jha, B, Ross, M. Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; : CD012479.
Google Scholar | Medline8. The British Society for Surgery of the Hand . Guidelines: flexor tendon management, www.bssh.ac.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/professionals/Trauma%20standards/3%20Flexor%20tendon%20final.pdf (2020, accessed 11 March 2021).
Google Scholar9. Henry, SL, Howell, JW. Use of a relative motion flexion orthosis for postoperative management of zone I/II flexor digitorum profundus repair: a retrospective consecutive case series. J Hand Ther 2020; 33: 296–304.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Gratton, P. Early active mobilization after flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Ther 1993; 6: 285–289.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Peck, FH, Roe, AE, Ng, CY, et al. The Manchester short splint: a change to splinting practice in the rehabilitation of zone II flexor tendon repairs. Hand Ther 2014; 19: 47–53.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals12. Merritt, WH. Relative motion splint: active motion after extensor tendon injury and repair. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 1187–1194.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Hirth, MJ, Bennett, K, Mah, E, et al. Early return to work and improved range of motion with modified relative motion splinting: a retrospective comparison with immobilization splinting for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs. Hand Ther 2011; 16: 86–94.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals14. Hirth, MJ, Howell, JW, Feehan, LM, et al. Postoperative hand therapy management of zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs of the fingers: an international inquiry of current practice. J Hand Ther 2020; 34: 58–75.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Hirth, MJ, Howell, JW, O'Brien, L. Relative motion orthoses in the management of various hand conditions: a scoping review. J Hand Ther 2016; 29: 405–432.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Howell, JW, Merritt, WH, Robinson, SJ. Immediate controlled active motion following zone 4-7 extensor tendon repair. J Hand Ther 2005; 18: 182–190.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Collocott, SJF, Kelly, E, Foster, M, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing early active motion programs: earlier hand function, TAM, and orthotic satisfaction with a relative motion extension program for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs. J Hand Ther 2020; 33: 13–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Merritt, WH, Howell, J, Tune, R, et al. Achieving immediate active motion by using relative motion splinting after long extensor repair and sagittal band ruptures with tendon subluxation. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 7: 31–37.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Newington, L, Ross, R, Wormwald, J, et al. Relative motion flexion splinting after flexor tendon repair: a systematic review. PROSPERO. 2020. CRD42020197169, www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020197169 (accessed 21 February 2021).
Google Scholar20. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools for use in JBI systematic reviews. Checklist for Qualitative Research, https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/Checklist_for_Case_Series.pdf (2017, accessed 10 December 2020).
Google Scholar22. Colditz, J. Use of a relative motion orthosis for regaining PIP joint flexion or extension, https://bracelab.com/clinicians-classroom/relative-motion-orthosis/ (2013, accessed 15 August 2020).
Google Scholar23. O’Connell, A, Hacquebord, J, Seu, M. Protected early active motion orthosis (PEAMO) in the management of zone II-III flexor. Open Science Framework 2020; DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/C85YN, https://osf.io/c85yn/ (accessed 11 May 2021).
Google Scholar24. Chung, B, Chiu, DTW, Thanik, V. Relative motion flexion splinting for flexor tendon lacerations: proof of concept. Hand (New York, NY) 2019; 14: 193–196.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals25. Strickland, J, Glogovac, S. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5: 537–534.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Beaton, DE, Wright, JG, Katz, JN. Upper extremity collaborative group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Jt Surg 2005; 87: 1038–1046.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI27. Merritt, WH, Howell, JW. Relative motion orthoses: the concepts and application to hand therapy management of finger extensor tendon zone III and VII repairs, acute and chronic boutonniére deformity, and sagittal band injury. In: Skirven, TM, Lee, OA, Fedorczyk, J, et al. (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 7th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier, 2020, pp.1496–1510.
Google Scholar28. Wong, J, Peck, F. Improving results of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134: 913–925.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Sackett, DL, Rosenberg, WM, Gray, JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Groth, G, Wilder, D, Young, V. The impact of compliance on the rehabilitation of patients with mallet finger injuries. J Hand Ther 1994; 7: 21–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Khandwala, A, Webb, J, Harris, S, et al. A comparison of dynamic extension splinting and controlled active mobilization of complete divisions of extensor tendons in zones 5 and 6. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25: 140–146.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals32. Wilke, J, Krause, F, Niederer, D, et al. Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale. J Anat 2015; 226: 440–446.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Cooper, L, Khor, W, Burr, N, et al. Flexor tendon repairs in children: outcomes from a specialist tertiary centre. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2015; 68: 717–723.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Huynh, MN, Ghumman, A, Agarwal, A, et al. Outcomes after flexor tendon injuries in the pediatric population: a 10-year retrospective review. Am Assoc Hand Surg 2020; https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944720926651.
Google Scholar

Comments (0)

No login
gif