Diagnostic utility of imprint cytology in assessing surgical margins during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Kidney tumors rank as the sixth most prevalent cancer among men and the ninth among women in the United States [1]. Globally approximately 430,000 new cases of kidney cancer are diagnosed each year, with approximately 180,000 associated deaths. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) constitutes over 90 % of these cases, encompassing three primary pathological subtypes: clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), and chromophobe RCC (chRCC). ccRCC is the most common type and accounts for 70–75 % of cases [2]. In Turkey, ccRCC is also the most prevalent subtype of RCC, representing a 72 % proportion of cases [3].

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended for patients with cT1 and cT2 renal tumors whenever technically feasible [4]. Achieving a negative surgical margin is considered a major crucial issue for oncological outcomes for PN [5]. Nonetheless, literature indicates that the rate of positive surgical margins (PSM) ranges from 2 to 8 %. Prior studies have shown that PSM significantly elevates the risk of long-term recurrence and serves as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival. However, the correlation between surgical margin status and disease progression, as well as progression-free survival, remains contentious [6].

Imprint cytology (IC) emerges as a straightforward, expeditious, and cost-effective method, boasting a diagnostic accuracy of approximately 78 % for assessing surgical margins [7]. Despite IC being a longstanding method for intraoperative evaluations in pulmonary lesions, melanomas, and breast cancer, there are limited studies for urological cancers [8]. Nevertheless, the current literature offers limited insight into the practical application of IC.

This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the IC method in patients undergoing laparoscopic PN (LPN).

Comments (0)

No login
gif