Differences in complications between colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan using large-scale health insurance claims data

 SFX Search Permissions and Reprints Abstract Background and study aims

Analyses of colonoscopy (CS) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) complications is crucial for further promoting use of endoscopy. This study analyzed rates of severe complications of CS compared with those of EGD using big data.

Patients and methods

As a study population, we retrospectively used commercially anonymized health insurance claims data covering 3,050,954 patients from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients ≥ 50 years old who underwent CS or EGD without treatment were included in the study. The main outcomes were differences in rates of hemorrhage, perforation, and fatal events between EGD and CS, and risk factors of each complication comparing CS with EGD.

Results

Among 290,470 CSs (male: 182,910, female: 107,560, median age [range]: 58 [50–75]) and 726,075 EGDs (male: 412,365, female: 313,710, 58 [50–75]), rates of hemorrhage, perforation, and fatal events for EGD and CS were 0.0069% vs. 0.0069% (P = 0.558), 0.0006% vs. 0.0024% (P = 0.008), and 0.00028% vs. 0.00034% (P = 0.648), respectively. Rates of hemorrhage for cases aged 50 to 64 and 65 to 75 years were 0.0059% vs. 0.0110% (P = 0.042) for EGD and 0.0061% vs. 0.0108% for CS (P = 0.264). Risks of hemorrhage for comparing CS to EGD were significant for biopsy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.75 [1.15–6.21]; P = 0.017) and antithrombotics (aOR 12.48; 95% CI 1.80–247.14; P = 0.026). Those for perforation were significant for ages 50 to 64 years (aOR 9.58; 95% CI 2.17–66.10; P = 0.006) and male sex (11.76 [1.85–222.65], P = 0.025).

Conclusions

Compared with EGD, CS had a higher rate of perforation but not hemorrhage. Complication rates in CS did not differ by age.

Keywords Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - CRC screening - Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complications Publication History

Received: 21 January 2025

Accepted after revision: 19 August 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 August 2025

Article published online:
12 September 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Naohisa Yoshida, Hideki Ishikawa, Michihro Mutoh, Naoto Iwai, Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yoshito Itoh, Azusa Yoda, Ayako Maeda-Minami, Yasunari Mano. Differences in complications between colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan using large-scale health insurance claims data. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26896049.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2689-6049

Comments (0)

No login
gif