Background Progressive decline in pulmonary oxygen reserve capacity (ORC) is a hallmark of infection-associated respiratory dysfunction. Current tools (PaO2/FiO2 ratio, cardiopulmonary exercise testing [CPET], computed tomography [CT]) are limited in dynamic monitoring due to delayed responsiveness, operational complexity, or radiation risks, and other constraints.
Methods The ORC testing methodology integrates the dynamic load-incrementation logic of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with the oxygenation quantification framework of PaO2/FiO2. Its operational paradigm comprises three phases:
➀Testing Protocol
Conducted under ventilation-locked conditions, a stepwise FiO2 titration protocol is applied, with termination triggered when SpO2
➁Parameter Definition
The minimum FiO2 required to maintain SpO2 ≥90% (FiO2-MIN) is recorded, and the oxygen reserve capacity is calculated as ORC = 0.21 - FiO2-MIN.
➂Dynamic Modeling
Through continuous monitoring throughout the entire disease course, ORC time-series data are acquired. A time-ORC curve is then fitted, and based on differential calculus (β = ΔORC/Δt, γ = Δβ/Δt), they collectively establish a quantitative respiratory compensation dynamics model in conjunction with the time-ORC curve.
Results The ORC test provides a novel non-invasive tool for dynamic quantification of respiratory reserve. Early warning of ARDS transformation during acute infection and quantitative dynamic tracking of lung dysfunction of long-COVID syndrome are its potential application scenarios. Its clinical utility requires prospective validation through multicenter trials integrated with CPET and CT quantitative analysis.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Comments (0)