Introduction Globally, primary care (PC) features like accessibility, continuity, and coordination enhance health outcomes. In China, 940,000 public facilities delivered 4.266 billion PC visits in 2022 (50.68% of total visits), focusing on chronic disease management and public health. Unlike Western gatekeeper models, China’s PC lacks this structure, influencing its characteristics and effectiveness.
Objective This review synthesises China’s PC functional features and their relationship with health service outcomes since 2009, combining quantitative and qualitative evidence.
Methods Using the JBI mixed-methods framework, we will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Data for studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods). Two reviewers will screen and assess quality with JBI tools (>50% threshold). A convergent segregated approach integrates quantitative data (feature strength, associations with outcomes) with qualitative insights (stakeholder views on features and effects).
Discussion This review may shed light on the functional features of China’s primary care system and their relationship with health service outcomes. The synthesized evidence could inform clinical practice, health service delivery, and health policy regarding the health service process of primary care in China, while also identifying areas for future research.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementFunding: 2024 Shanghai City Yangpu District Science and Technology and Economic Committee Deepening Medical Reform Innovation Research Project, Grant Number: YPYG202403 National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant Number: 72104183
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Comments (0)