Background Forearm fractures are the most common fractures in children, accounting for 41% of all paediatric fractures. Most research focuses on distal forearm fractures, but studies encompassing the entire forearm are limited. This retrospective study describes the distribution and patterns of paediatric forearm fractures over a five-year period.

Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 0-15 years who received a radiograph of the forearm, wrist or elbow between March 2019 and December 2023 in the study region. Fractures were manually identified and registered from radiological reports. Fracture location, type (complete/incomplete), and epiphyseal involvement were analyzed across different age groups. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and descriptive statistics.

Results We identified 4,547 forearm fractures from 4,291 children. The median age was 10 years, and 57% of the patients were male. Fracture patterns varied significantly across age groups (p<0.001), with older children experiencing more distal, complete, radial, and epiphyseal fractures. Younger children had a higher proportion of incomplete fractures and fewer distal or epiphyseal fractures. No significant differences in Salter-Harris classifications were found between age groups (p=0.69).

Conclusion Fracture patterns in paediatric forearm fractures vary with age, with older children showing a higher incidence of complete, distal, and epiphyseal fractures. This study provides a detailed characterization of paediatric forearm fractures, which may inform clinical management and preventive strategies, particularly in tailoring age-specific care. Further research should explore the long-term outcomes of these fracture patterns.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed by the North Denmark Region Ethical Committee, which determined that ethical approval was not required (no: 2-1-02-1167-24)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Due to the sensitive nature of the data, it is not freely available. However, data can be shared upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and the signing of a data sharing agreement. Interested researchers may contact the corresponding author for further details.